| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: OpenPandemics - COVID-19 Project
Thread: OpenPandemics - GPU Stress Test |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 781
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Biscotto
Cruncher Italy Joined: Apr 11, 2020 Post Count: 27 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Processor 90°C --- That's very high for water cooling; maybe try checking for dust in the radiator. By the way, I found that if you're running BOINC on your everyday computer, it's best not to run it at full throttle, because peak efficiency happens way before that. In other words you get almost the same performance with a huge power/thermals saving. Here's a couple of things you can do, in order of benefit/impact ratio:
Papa Ryzen 5 3600 / Mama Radeon RX 560 |
||
|
|
goben_2003
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 16, 2006 Post Count: 146 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I notice that the flow on the intel GPU has stopped since yesterday afternoon. A constant flow remains on my AMD GPU. (trimmed) I am guessing you did not make the same mistake that I did, but just in case. Are the GPUs on the same system? Do you have a limit set for OPN tasks in the WCG profile? I had one machine with 2 GPUs fill up on intel and not get the faster nvidia tasks until I removed the limit.  |
||
|
|
Biscotto
Cruncher Italy Joined: Apr 11, 2020 Post Count: 27 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I went into the result status for the first time and noticed that all my OPNG tasks are valid but rated like this:
----------------------------------------OPNG_0017786_00177_0 | valid | 0.09 / 0.35 | 0.6 / 1,602.7 I know very little on how points work, but shouldn't that 0.6 be higher?  Papa Ryzen 5 3600 / Mama Radeon RX 560 |
||
|
|
goben_2003
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 16, 2006 Post Count: 146 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks, -Uplinger Hi, I still have not get a single GPU work unit for Intel HD520 and Intel UHD GPUs (been running for couple of weeks now) . Intel HD 4600 is getting some. 3 days ago I reinstalled the win10 on HD 520 laptop, but that didn't seem to help either. (trimmed) Which intel UHD GPUs? I am running on 2 UHD 620 and 1 UHD 630. Where was it installed from? One of my machines was the victim of Windows 10 auto upgrading the driver. I downloaded the full driver (not from microsoft) and reinstalled, then it worked. Not sure if it the driver version actually matters, but here are the ones I am using: 1 UHD with 26.20.100.7262, 1 UHD 620 with 2620.100.8142, 1 UHD 630 with 27.20.100.8681. |
||
|
|
biini
Senior Cruncher Finland Joined: Jan 25, 2007 Post Count: 334 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Which intel UHD GPUs? I am running on 2 UHD 620 and 1 UHD 630. Where was it installed from? One of my machines was the victim of Windows 10 auto upgrading the driver. I downloaded the full driver (not from microsoft) and reinstalled, then it worked. Not sure if it the driver version actually matters, but here are the ones I am using: 1 UHD with 26.20.100.7262, 1 UHD 620 with 2620.100.8142, 1 UHD 630 with 27.20.100.8681. I'm not actually sure. The device manager, lenovo system specs, and Boinc eventlog says only "Intel UHD Graphics" (Lenovo T14s, i7-10510U). A couple of days ago I installed latest drivers from intel.com driver version 27.20.100.9466 but that did not seem to make any difference |
||
|
|
goben_2003
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 16, 2006 Post Count: 146 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Which intel UHD GPUs? I am running on 2 UHD 620 and 1 UHD 630. Where was it installed from? One of my machines was the victim of Windows 10 auto upgrading the driver. I downloaded the full driver (not from microsoft) and reinstalled, then it worked. Not sure if it the driver version actually matters, but here are the ones I am using: 1 UHD with 26.20.100.7262, 1 UHD 620 with 2620.100.8142, 1 UHD 630 with 27.20.100.8681. I'm not actually sure. The device manager, lenovo system specs, and Boinc eventlog says only "Intel UHD Graphics" (Lenovo T14s, i7-10510U). A couple of days ago I installed latest drivers from intel.com driver version 27.20.100.9466 but that did not seem to make any difference Yeah, for some reason intel stopped using model numbers with their mobile GPUs. The intel ark page for it show it having the same # of execution cores and GHz as the UHD 620/630 that my i7s have. The one thing that I notice is different is that all of my machines report the intel GPUs as openCL 2.1. The one machine that auto updated and stopped working upgraded to a version that reported it as openCL 3.0 like yours reports as. Not sure if that matters, but the driver I installed to get it working reported it as openCL 2.1. Edit: The driver I reinstalled was from the laptop's brand website. [Edit 1 times, last edit by goben_2003 at Apr 28, 2021 11:55:49 AM] |
||
|
|
biini
Senior Cruncher Finland Joined: Jan 25, 2007 Post Count: 334 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Which intel UHD GPUs? I am running on 2 UHD 620 and 1 UHD 630. Where was it installed from? One of my machines was the victim of Windows 10 auto upgrading the driver. I downloaded the full driver (not from microsoft) and reinstalled, then it worked. Not sure if it the driver version actually matters, but here are the ones I am using: 1 UHD with 26.20.100.7262, 1 UHD 620 with 2620.100.8142, 1 UHD 630 with 27.20.100.8681. I'm not actually sure. The device manager, lenovo system specs, and Boinc eventlog says only "Intel UHD Graphics" (Lenovo T14s, i7-10510U). A couple of days ago I installed latest drivers from intel.com driver version 27.20.100.9466 but that did not seem to make any difference Yeah, for some reason intel stopped using model numbers with their mobile GPUs. The intel ark page for it show it having the same # of execution cores and GHz as the UHD 620/630 that my i7s have. The one thing that I notice is different is that all of my machines report the intel GPUs as openCL 2.1. The one machine that auto updated and stopped working upgraded to a version that reported it as openCL 3.0 like yours reports as. Not sure if that matters, but the driver I installed to get it working reported it as openCL 2.1. Edit: The driver I reinstalled was from the laptop's brand website. Just checked, both non-working Intel GPUs (HD 520, UHD) are reporting CL3.0. The old one that is working says it's CL1.2. I'll take a look at this Are you running linux or windows? ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by biini at Apr 28, 2021 12:24:08 PM] |
||
|
|
Ian-n-Steve C.
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: May 15, 2020 Post Count: 180 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
is this a record? 1253 jobs. ran for over an hour on an RTX 2080. and after all that, it errored because the file size was too big.
----------------------------------------OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:02:51] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:02:52] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000020085894--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1247)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:02:55] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:02:56] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000027705450--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1248)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:02:58] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:02:59] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000001396771--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1249)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:01] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:02] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000002483285--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1250)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:05] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:06] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000307946267--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1251)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:09] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:10] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000100229739--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1252)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:12] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:13] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000064503714_1--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1253)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:16] End AutoDock... INFO:Cpu time = 4109.314626 05:03:18 (1245982): called boinc_finish(0) </stderr_txt> <message> upload failure: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>OPNG_0013370_00004_1_r303777678_0</file_name> <error_code>-131 (file size too big)</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> kind of sucks to waste over an hour on this and get nothing due to technicality (file size too big). maybe don't send out jobs this big? you'll never get the results. as a comparison, I had another one of these run on the same system, but only 1029 jobs, ran for just under an hour and it wasn't "too big". and still only got the ~1700 credit reward. OPNG_0013370_00005 so tasks that take ~1hr to run isn't worth more credits than tasks that run for ~1-2mins? something definitely needs to be looked at in terms of effort vs reward. either fix the slow running tasks or up the reward.  EPYC 7V12 / [5] RTX A4000 EPYC 7B12 / [5] RTX 3080Ti + [2] RTX 2080Ti EPYC 7B12 / [6] RTX 3070Ti + [2] RTX 3060 [2] EPYC 7642 / [2] RTX 2080Ti [Edit 2 times, last edit by Ian-n-Steve C. at Apr 28, 2021 12:56:12 PM] |
||
|
|
goben_2003
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 16, 2006 Post Count: 146 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Which intel UHD GPUs? I am running on 2 UHD 620 and 1 UHD 630. Where was it installed from? One of my machines was the victim of Windows 10 auto upgrading the driver. I downloaded the full driver (not from microsoft) and reinstalled, then it worked. Not sure if it the driver version actually matters, but here are the ones I am using: 1 UHD with 26.20.100.7262, 1 UHD 620 with 2620.100.8142, 1 UHD 630 with 27.20.100.8681. I'm not actually sure. The device manager, lenovo system specs, and Boinc eventlog says only "Intel UHD Graphics" (Lenovo T14s, i7-10510U). A couple of days ago I installed latest drivers from intel.com driver version 27.20.100.9466 but that did not seem to make any difference Yeah, for some reason intel stopped using model numbers with their mobile GPUs. The intel ark page for it show it having the same # of execution cores and GHz as the UHD 620/630 that my i7s have. The one thing that I notice is different is that all of my machines report the intel GPUs as openCL 2.1. The one machine that auto updated and stopped working upgraded to a version that reported it as openCL 3.0 like yours reports as. Not sure if that matters, but the driver I installed to get it working reported it as openCL 2.1. Edit: The driver I reinstalled was from the laptop's brand website. Just checked, both non-working Intel GPUs (HD 520, UHD) are reporting CL3.0. The old one that is working says it's CL1.2. I'll take a look at this Are you running linux or windows? Windows 10 |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
is this a record? 1253 jobs. ran for over an hour on an RTX 2080. and after all that, it errored because the file size was too big. OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:02:51] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:02:52] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000020085894--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1247)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:02:55] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:02:56] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000027705450--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1248)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:02:58] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:02:59] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000001396771--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1249)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:01] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:02] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000002483285--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1250)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:05] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:06] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000307946267--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1251)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:09] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:10] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000100229739--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1252)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:12] End AutoDock... INFO:[05:03:13] Start AutoDock for OB3ZINC000064503714_1--7jji_002_mgltools--TYR380_inert.dpf(Job #1253)... OpenCL device: GeForce RTX 2080 INFO:[05:03:16] End AutoDock... INFO:Cpu time = 4109.314626 05:03:18 (1245982): called boinc_finish(0) </stderr_txt> <message> upload failure: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>OPNG_0013370_00004_1_r303777678_0</file_name> <error_code>-131 (file size too big)</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> kind of sucks to waste over an hour on this and get nothing due to technicality (file size too big). maybe don't send out jobs this big? you'll never get the results. as a comparison, I had another one of these run on the same system, but only 1029 jobs, ran for just under an hour and it wasn't "too big". and still only got the ~1700 credit reward. OPNG_0013370_00005 so tasks that take ~1hr to run isn't worth more credits than tasks that run for ~1-2mins? something definitely needs to be looked at in terms of effort vs reward. either fix the slow running tasks or up the reward. FWIW I’ve had 3 that ran for over an hour and they all errored.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
  |
||
|
|
|