Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 96
Posts: 96   Pages: 10   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 14485 times and has 95 replies Next Thread
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher
The Great State of Texas
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 1053
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

And here I thought it was to help Parents get their kids to (Stop Running Around). biggrin

No problems with the WU's on this end. Linux and/or various flavors of Win (XP to 7).

coffee
cowboy
----------------------------------------

[Jan 16, 2017 4:12:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Seoulpowergrid
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Apr 12, 2013
Post Count: 815
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

82 are valid or PV, 6 haven't run yet, 1 errored (as mentioned before on page 1).
Of the completed WUS, 6 were 1 1/2 ~ 2 hours, 18 were 1 ~ 1 1/2 hours, the rest were under an hour.
----------------------------------------

[Jan 16, 2017 4:20:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
widdershins
Veteran Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Post Count: 674
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

I've had three units that I had to abort due to them becoming stuck. All the others ran fine but those three ran fine at firt then hit a brick wall and even after 5-6 hours had not moved even 0.00001% further on. So after they had been running for around 24hrs I aborted them.

BETA_SRA1_0000000_Bct-A_28622
BETA_SRA1_0000000_Bct-A_28982 (Which went to valid on two other machines with less than 1 hr cpu time used)
BETA_SRA1_0000000_Bct-A_28992

The machine they failed on is a little older, but for all other projects and work units is a faultless performer, giving zero errors. Other units were running at the same time (betas and FAAH2 and Zika) and they all finished fine, so I don't think it was a machine glitch.



Edit: All three of those units subsequently crunched fine in about 1hr for others. (Windows machines)
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by widdershins at Jan 17, 2017 9:21:05 AM]
[Jan 16, 2017 8:41:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[SG-FC] hl
Cruncher
Joined: Dec 19, 2009
Post Count: 31
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

got 5574 WUs, most Windows, some LINUX
no Errors (377 still in Pending, 17 in Verfication),
thank you,

smile hl
----------------------------------------

[Jan 16, 2017 9:17:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1671
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Got about 90 WUs, mostly Linux, only 8 for Windows 7.
At this time, the project seems to run very smoothly, no incident, no error, reasonable computation time (between 30 minutes and 75 minutes for Phenom II x6 at 2.8 resp. 3.2 GHz, i7 4770K at 3.5 GHz, i7 6700K at 4 GHz).
It looks like that it is a nice pre-launch.
The granted credits seem to be a little behind OET1 and Zika.
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Jan 16, 2017 2:56:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
supdood
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 6, 2015
Post Count: 333
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Had one go invalid on Android 6.0.1:

Result Name: BETA_ SRA1_ 0000000_ Bct-A_ 68132_ 1--

<core_client_version>7.4.53</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
stackdumps unavailable
INFO: result number = 1
8388608
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[14:34:35] Number of tasks = 1
[14:34:35] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000
[14:34:35] ./cmpd-0068132.pdbqt size = 23 3 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta24.Bct-A.pdbqt size = 4617 0
[17:43:12] Finished task #0 cpu time used 11052.160000
17:43:12 (7050): called boinc_finish(0)

</stderr_txt>
]]>


The wingman also went invalid:

Result Name: BETA_ SRA1_ 0000000_ Bct-A_ 68132_ 0--

<core_client_version>7.0.36</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
INFO: result number = 0
8388608
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[06:40:07] Number of tasks = 1
[06:40:07] Running task 0,CPU time at start of task 0 was 0.000000
[06:40:07] ./cmpd-0068132.pdbqt size = 23 3 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/beta24.Bct-A.pdbqt size = 4617 0
[09:16:48] Finished task #0 cpu time used 9330.130000
09:16:48 (4350): called boinc_finish(0)

</stderr_txt>
]]>
----------------------------------------
Crunch with BOINC team USA
www.boincusa.com

[Jan 16, 2017 6:02:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3295
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Only got 4 on Linux 64-bit, AMD A8-6500.
2 Valid and 2 pending validation and they all ran in the 0.62-0.75 CPU hour range.
Looks good.
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Jan 16, 2017 6:31:24 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 1187
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

59 beta SRA1 jobs processed so far. I am seeing a 100% variance in run times when looking at individual machines. No problems seen so far.

I like the guess by roundup and Apis Tintinnambulator: Stop Resistance to Antibiotics. It fits the evidence well and sure sounds like a WCG naming. I have 3 family members working in hospitals and it is research that is very much needed. Those superbugs might be the end of us all.

Cheers coffee
----------------------------------------

[Jan 16, 2017 6:53:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

I'm only getting 8 at a time - 8 cores 8 tasks? - it's like pulling teeth - very hard to get them! like HSTB - I can't seem to get enough of them!
[Jan 16, 2017 10:43:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - January 12, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

No problems so far with my 5 wu's on Windows 10.

Nice thinking of Apis Tintinnambulator. But the resistance of the bacteria is a major problem. So maybe it is called Solving the Resistance to Antibiotics. But probably your guess is as good as it is.
[Jan 17, 2017 1:18:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 96   Pages: 10   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread