| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: Mapping Cancer Markers Forum
Thread: MCM Progress Reports |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 957
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
At the present rate it will still be about another 2 years to finish the project. Full speed ahead. That's 4 months later than when you first started monitoring MCM production, mostly explained by the continuing drop off of the Ripple teams crunching. Unfortunately so. I was hoping you would throw on another couple of cores and pick up the slack.  Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher The Great State of Texas Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 1054 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Unfortunately so. I was hoping you would throw on another couple of cores and pick up the slack. Cheers I'd be willing to throw afew more into the mix..If I could talk you into kicking in on the electric bill.     [Edit 1 times, last edit by PecosRiverM at May 12, 2014 2:02:58 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
At the present rate it will still be about another 2 years to finish the project. Full speed ahead. That's 4 months later than when you first started monitoring MCM production, mostly explained by the continuing drop off of the Ripple teams crunching. How did you come to that conclusion? It was near the end of March when it was announced that Ripple was leaving. On April 7th is when MCM1 was temporarily disabled and has never been full-speed since. Look at the years to completion chart, after April 8th is when it started its upward ascent. |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
May 17, 2014 Update
----------------------------------------The following figures are based on a total number of work units of 350,000,000 from cubes. Last 30 day average results: 353,532 Estimated end date using 30 day average: May 26, 2016 Percent Complete: 25.18951 % The average length of a WU is currently running about 3.61 hours. At the present rate it will still be about another 2 years to finish the project. We have now passed the 25% mark - more than one quarter finished by result. Full speed ahead.   Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Seoulpowergrid
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Apr 12, 2013 Post Count: 823 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
As it dropped lower priority in the feeder the expected completion date kept being pushed back. Last week-ish Sgt.Joe's update showed May 30, 2016 and now it shows May 26, 2016; a sign it has stabilized. Very nice to see that.
----------------------------------------Thanks again for the updates Sgt.Joe!  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Just completed a result 0004411_9252 _ 0 where we know each batch has 10000 blobs that have a quorum 2. This puts the circulated originals at 88220000. The big question is, where is 4411 placing the project in progress? The 350 million was a broad generalized calculation afaicr. Is it we're still computing the first of 4 experiments, the first experiment having 2 targets iirc? Think wcg and scientists should by now be able to tell us more accurately where we're standing 1/4 into the project to make this charting and eop calculating less guessy.
|
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just completed a result 0004411_9252 _ 0 where we know each batch has 10000 blobs that have a quorum 2. This puts the circulated originals at 88220000. The big question is, where is 4411 placing the project in progress? The 350 million was a broad generalized calculation afaicr. Is it we're still computing the first of 4 experiments, the first experiment having 2 targets iirc? Think wcg and scientists should by now be able to tell us more accurately where we're standing 1/4 into the project to make this charting and eop calculating less guessy. I agree. It would be nice to hear from the researchers occasionally, so if there are changes to the project. I could make adjustments to my estimation process. Besides, it has been a while since we have heard anything from them. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
TKH
Former World Community Grid Admin USA Joined: Aug 13, 2005 Post Count: 775 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Hello All,
The research scientists are working on their next project update now and we should have it shortly. Thanks. Tedi |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The WU's for the past 5-days or so seem to behave a bit differently than the previous ones, so I think we have indeed completed all of the lung cancer WU's. By behaving differently, they are slower to increment but go in larger increments compared to the previous batches. The result files are the same though; usually between 148 and 150 bytes.
Until the scientists make their statement this is all just speculation though. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Technicians and volunteers would all wish the result files were that tiny, 148-150 byte, then the proect could run uninhibited by storage space concerns.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 20, 2014 3:18:22 PM] |
||
|
|
|