| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Active Research
Forum: Mapping Cancer Markers Forum
Thread: MCM Progress Reports |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 957
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The percentages progress jumped ahead for all, fa@h from 77 to 88 and cep2 from 95 to 97. ha... CEP2 went down to 62% ... go figure. CJSL Crunching for a brighter future... Probably because there is no set end for CEP2. They are using the returned results from CEP1 and CEP2 to pick new candidates, so new batches are probably always being added. They just added a new scientist that they said will help pick the new candidates. So I am not surprised to see CEP2 drop down from the 90% range. Why add a new scientist as the work was wrapping up? |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
July 13, 2014 Update
----------------------------------------The following figures are based on a total number of work units of 350,000,000 from cubes. Last 30 day average results: 580,538 Estimated end date using 30 day average: August 17, 2015 Percent Complete: 33.53179% The average length of a WU is currently running about 3.28 hours. If I add a potential 42,000,000 resends into the mix, the project is about 29.94% complete. If I look at the latest batch I have received, 5874, that would be about 33.57% complete. So, based on completed units and current batch loadings, we are about 1/3 done.   Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Re: MCM Progress Reports - July 20 Update
----------------------------------------July 20, 2014 Update The following figures are based on a total number of work units of 350,000,000 from cubes. Last 30 day average results: 585,338 Estimated end date using 30 day average: August 13, 2015 Percent Complete: 34.86888% The average length of a WU is currently running about 3.58 hours. If I add a potential 42,000,000 resends into the mix, the project is about 31.13293% complete. If I look at the latest batch I have received, 6131, that would be about 35.03% complete.   Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
July 27, 2014 Update
----------------------------------------The following figures are based on a total number of work units of 350,000,000 from cubes. Last 30 day average results: 542,114 Estimated end date using 30 day average: September 14, 2015 Percent Complete: 35.8706% The average length of a WU is currently running about 2.59 hours. If I add a potential 42,000,000 resends into the mix, the project is about 32.02732% complete. If I look at the latest batch I have received, 6282, that would be about 35.90% complete.   Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
August 3, 2014 Update
----------------------------------------The following figures are based on a total number of work units of 350,000,000 from cubes. Last 30 day average results: 557,826 Estimated end date using 30 day average: September 2, 2015 Percent Complete: 36.93387% The average length of a WU is currently running about 4.77 hours. If I add a potential 42,000,000 resends into the mix, the project is about 32.98% complete. If I look at the latest batch I have received, 6468, that would be about 36.96% complete. The lengthier units are showing their impact on the completion date.   Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Thanks for the update Joe. Yes as you point out it appears that longer work units take 12 days off the completion date. I would have expected it to increase not decrease.
----------------------------------------I have one question out of interest mainly when you work out the average run time do you use the time from the statistics by project page or do you use your own computers run-time length? I am just interested to know that is all.  |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7844 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have one question out of interest mainly when you work out the average run time do you use the time from the statistics by project page or do you use your own computers run-time length? I am just interested to know that is all. I use the run time and results totals from the statistics page. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1326 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I have one question out of interest mainly when you work out the average run time do you use the time from the statistics by project page or do you use your own computers run-time length? I am just interested to know that is all. I use the run time and results totals from the statistics page. Cheers Awesome Joe thanks for the clarification :) |
||
|
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3315 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Thank you very much for the continued updates, Sgt. Joe.
---------------------------------------- - AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W - AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
|
asdavid
Veteran Cruncher FRANCE Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 521 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Thank you very much for the continued updates, Sgt. Joe. +1
Anne-Sophie
 |
||
|
|
|