Yes it is but it is the scientists at the indivifual projects that make the decision whether a).GPU processing is suitable for their project; and b). whether to invest the necessary resources to develop GPU WUs.

WCG can only process work forwarded by the scientists.

Sounds like we need some nice folks to possibly create a snazzy website to link up programmers with these brilliant scientists to work with one another!

Wish I could do this!

Coleslaw - thanks for the insight it is greatly appreciated! I guess it give me more time to save up for AMD Radeo R9 295X2 Graphics card.

I am doing Folding@home so its still helps with the cancer research I just wish they worked like WCG were it say you have contributed 10 years of processing power. That hold more weight for me then you have 2 million points.

Can someone point me to the post that described the math differences in using a CPU vs GPU? The lack of projects frustrates me. If Mapping Cancer was on GPU, they would be done by now.

Cancer is killing people everyday. These people don't have time to wait for our slow CPUs to finish. I did 28K WUs for HCC in 6 months. I am only up to 5K for MCM in 6 months. OpenCL can't be that difficult. Am I missing something?

Yes, mymbtheduke.
Sadly enough, our computers are not finding cures, they are only providing useful data for researchers and, at best, indicating ways to explore.
And at the current pace of our "slow" CPUs it seems that they are already doing it faster than what human beings can do next.

I am sincerely confident that if researchers were slowed by our part of the process they would invest more in IT application development in order to get faster what they would be waiting for.

Thanks. I didn't know about the Seti GPU. I have a laptop with the 2500 in it so will try it.

I have been crunching for GPU. Have 38million credits. I just want to help other cancer initiatives.