| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Teams
Thread:  Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 62 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 661
|
|
| Author |
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 11/18 - Active Members
----------------------------------------Active team members report ==========================
Note: Active members are those who earned points in the prior 30 days. Top Twenty active members returning points today: 01: RT - 256,693 points 02: judson Somerville MD - 174,304 points 03: GeraldRube - 81,614 points 04: brown chris - 61,896 points 05: xroule - 58,818 points 06: dkt - 48,845 points 07: Coingames - 48,251 points 08: Tomwp - 26,313 points 09: largethunder - 22,401 points 10: smcclarigan - 20,417 points 11: keithhenry - 19,281 points 12: Fanie - 15,337 points 13: darth_vader - 13,704 points 14: lawrencehardin - 13,072 points 15: NiceMedTexMD - 11,595 points 16: Lanscader - 9,269 points 17: Jonathon Wright - 8,164 points 18: PohSoon - 8,138 points 19: SteelDragon - 6,894 points 20: nl59056 - 5,732 points Total points returned today: 940,353 Active members returning points today: 32 Average points per member active today: 29,386.0313 |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
.................................CONGRATULATIONS dkt ON REACHING 43,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!................................. |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
FYI.....Mapping Cancer Markers is back. I've gotten new WUs for it.
---------------------------------------- |
|||
|
||||
|
RT
Master Cruncher USA - Texas - DFW Joined: Dec 22, 2004 Post Count: 2636 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
FYI.....Mapping Cancer Markers is back. I've gotten new WUs for it. Ditto. Here we go again! |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 11/19 - All Members:
----------------------------------------Team rank movement report =========================
Points milestones report ======================== No points milestones found.  Runtime milestones report ========================= No runtime milestones found. Results returned milestones report ================================== cht! reached 1,900 results  New members report ================== No new members found. Retired members report ====================== No new retired members found. For the week as a team: Statistics Total Run Time Points Results Team Records: Results Returned: 11/13/2012 8,777 Points: 01/06/2013 3,311,422 Runtime: 04/05/2012 1:197:18:06:42 Team Streaks: Results Returned: Good crunching folks!!!!! |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 11/19 - Active Members
----------------------------------------Active team members report ==========================
Note: Active members are those who earned points in the prior 30 days. Top Twenty active members returning points today: 01: judson Somerville MD - 216,536 points 02: RT - 192,608 points 03: GeraldRube - 123,813 points 04: xroule - 63,719 points 05: dkt - 62,868 points 06: brown chris - 54,713 points 07: Coingames - 41,398 points 08: largethunder - 25,590 points 09: Tomwp - 25,262 points 10: doright - 20,237 points 11: darth_vader - 16,931 points 12: PohSoon - 16,686 points 13: keithhenry - 16,180 points 14: Lanscader - 16,127 points 15: lawrencehardin - 15,139 points 16: Fanie - 9,801 points 17: smcclarigan - 9,512 points 18: Jonathon Wright - 8,947 points 19: Mechanical - 8,803 points 20: NiceMedTexMD - 8,588 points Total points returned today: 982,157 Active members returning points today: 32 Average points per member active today: 30,692.4063 |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I think there may be more of a risk of having more work in your cache than you've asked for with MCM1 and BOINC 7.x. BOINC 6.x used the time to completion numbers to figure when you needed more work in your cache. As I understand it, BOINC 7 uses a FLOPS estimate. With MCM1, WUs vary much more than with past projects. I suspect that increases the chance that the FLOPS estimate could be off. I don't really see this being much of an issue if you're not running with a big cache - like over 4-5 days. The larger the cache, the bigger the risk of Wu's not getting completed in time. However, if you set your cache to say one day, you could actually have noticably more or less work than that. With a small cache, that won't normally matter. If you're doing something like trying to run your cache dry right before you shut your machines down and go on vacation, it may be a bit harder to have the last work finish close to shutdown time. I'm not completely convinced I'm right about all this but, given some work I've done with one of my machines, I definitely am wondering.
---------------------------------------- |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Keith, I don't understand the problem you are having an issue with. If you are saying you want to control the amount of work in your cache prior to shutting down the machines for taking time off, I think you already have that regardless of the algorithm used to determine how many WUs to load into the cache.
If I want to have control over the numbers of WUs downloaded, I would reduce the "Max additional work buffer" to zero. On the day I plan to do the shutdown, I would go to Project and specify "No new tasks". I think this should be done regardless of the algorithm used by BOINC to determine the number of WUs to be downloaded. Am I missing something in what you are saying? |
|||
|
||||
|
brown chris
Master Cruncher California - USA Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 2556 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I've notice with the MCM wu's, they seem to be consistent in their times, now.
----------------------------------------I have about 15 WU's ready to report, and they all took just short of four hours to complete (give or take just a few minutes).
BIG BANG THEORY: In the beginning there was nothing... which exploded
|
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We have 4 android devices which run the "Fight Aids ..." project and I am seeing a bunch of the WUs being marked invalid (17 after just reviewing the results). I don't see any indication in the log regarding why they should be so marked this way. The latest I reviewed has 16 tasks and ends with:
[02:45:20] Starting task 15,CPU time is 24818.830000. [02:45:20] ./ZINC04037134.pdbqt size = 21 7 ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/fahv.x3AVCaINy3A.pdbqt size = 2842 0 [03:05:43] Finished task #15 cpu time used 1175.580000 03:05:43 (3867): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Can anyone give me any idea of why a WU may be marked invaalid? |
|||
|
||||
|
|