| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: New Project Beta test v6.05 Issues Thread |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 62
|
|
| Author |
|
|
petehardy
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: May 4, 2007 Post Count: 318 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
That's the "Official" launch I think.
---------------------------------------- "Patience is a virtue", I can't wait to learn it! |
||
|
|
deltavee
Ace Cruncher Texas Hill Country Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 4846 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My HT P4 took 14 hours elapsed time, 10 hours cpu time. I think I will have to retire it after HCC and C4CW are over.
----------------------------------------Edit: I forgot, it has a HD 5670 in it that crunched a bunch of GPU betas. I would keep it if I could crunch WCG GPU WUs and not CPU WUs.  [Edit 1 times, last edit by deltavee at Apr 13, 2012 10:08:43 PM] |
||
|
|
astroWX
Advanced Cruncher USA Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 56 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Seven boxes, 26 cores, snagged a whopping two Beta tasks. (Let's see, seventy-five y.o. now; at this rate, if I live to a full century, perhaps I'll log a month's worth of Beta work ...)
Both completed normally. 3h30m on Q9550 (stock speed). |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Completed one beta on an I7 950 in 3:55:37 (six CEP2 tasks running simultaneously with it) and one beta on an I7 2600K in 3:13:55 (seven CEP2 tasks running simultaneously with that one)...both successfully here, pending validation.
One more in queue locally. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
One of my wingmen
----------------------------------------[15:28:36] INFO: Finished tick number 219 For task BETA_ cfsw_ 0001_ 00001300_ 115:28:46 (3272): No heartbeat from core client for 30 sec - exiting ERROR: could not initialize graphics pointer in shared memory. [15:29:15] DEBUG: Restarting from checkpoint. [15:29:15]PctComplete = 0.916667 [15:29:15]ticks:currentTick:modules:currentModule:restart:seed240:220:6:0:0:30866 [15:31:49] [ERROR] Checkpoint failed. Exiting. This thing using the GPU? Or is that an...artifact? [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 14, 2012 2:07:52 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello ibsteve2u,
When we first started using BOINC, we would occasionally run into problems with BOINC allocating shared memory, which tended to be a scarce resource. I have not seen any shared memory problems for years. ? a device driver problem or a sign that reboot is needed? I have no idea. I will keep an eye out for more shared memory problems.  Lawrence |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
On one of my machines an i7 920... (usually very reliable)
----------------------------------------Most tasks completed with restarts EXAMPLE Result Log Result Name: BETA_ cfsw_ 0001_ 00001683_ 0-- <core_client_version>7.0.24</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> [03:42:49] INFO:Beginning simulation: 1990:240:441568385 [03:58:51] INFO: Finished tick number 4 [04:08:49] INFO: Finished tick number 9 [04:17:02] INFO: Finished tick number 14 04:20:01 (2672): No heartbeat from core client for 30 sec - exiting [04:21:22] DEBUG: Restarting from checkpoint. [04:21:22]PctComplete = 0.0666667 [04:21:22]ticks:currentTick:modules:currentModule:restart:seed240:16:6:0:0:26039 04:30:54 (3824): No heartbeat from core client for 30 sec - exiting [04:31:57] DEBUG: Restarting from checkpoint. [04:31:57]PctComplete = 0.0708333 [04:31:57]ticks:currentTick:modules:currentModule:restart:seed240:17:6:0:0:31658 04:36:57 (10964): No heartbeat from core client for 30 sec - exiting [04:37:31] DEBUG: Restarting from checkpoint. [04:37:31]PctComplete = 0.075 [04:37:31]ticks:currentTick:modules:currentModule:restart:seed240:18:6:0:0:32328 04:38:21 (9828): No heartbeat from core client for 30 sec - exiting [04:39:31] DEBUG: Restarting from checkpoint. [04:39:31]PctComplete = 0.075 [04:39:31]ticks:currentTick:modules:currentModule:restart:seed240:18:6:0:0:3 The task above got to tick 54 and the rest of the task completed normally One task errored however Result Name: BETA_ cfsw_ 0002_ 00002603_ 1-- <core_client_version>7.0.24</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code 211 (0xd3) </message> <stderr_txt> [05:05:22] INFO: Finished tick number 29 [05:17:57] INFO: Finished tick number 34 05:22:01 (9112): No heartbeat from core client for 30 sec - exiting ERROR: could not initialize graphics pointer in shared memory. [05:22:25] DEBUG: Restarting from checkpoint. [05:22:25]PctComplete = 0.154167 [05:22:25]ticks:currentTick:modules:currentModule:restart:seed240:37:6:0:0:8835 [05:25:28] [ERROR] Checkpoint failed. Exiting. could be worth looking at these tasks on this machine. [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 14, 2012 4:43:17 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
<comment>
Hello ibsteve2u, This thing using the GPU? Or is that an...artifact? A number of BOINC messages are not precise where precison is needed* so I'm guessing that ERROR: could not initialize graphics pointer in shared memory may be just another of those messages.------------ *For ex: Reporting 4 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks: GPU task? CPU task? The cruncher is assumed to learn the context and next shut up! I personally prefer explicit and precise statements that minimizes, if not eliminates, the reliance on context for proper rendering of meaning in messages. </comment> ; |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Had 2 repair jobs on linux.
job#1: BETA_ cfsw_ 0004_ 00004447_ 2-- 605 Valid 12.04.12 20:32:31 13.04.12 16:15:22 17.72 220.2 / 156.7 << moi BETA_ cfsw_ 0004_ 00004447_ 1-- 605 Valid 12.04.12 19:28:30 13.04.12 04:17:50 3.99 93.2 / 156.7 BETA_ cfsw_ 0004_ 00004447_ 0-- 605 Error 12.04.12 18:37:23 12.04.12 20:32:16 0.15 3.4 / 0.0 error message: process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/devi...Log.do?resultId=892553483 job#2: BETA_ cfsw_ 0003_ 00003646_ 3-- 605 Pending Validation 12.04.12 21:27:51 13.04.12 12:37:19 14.48 177.8 / 0.0 <<moi BETA_ cfsw_ 0003_ 00003646_ 2-- - In Progress 12.04.12 19:07:46 16.04.12 19:07:46 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ cfsw_ 0003_ 00003646_ 1-- 605 Error 12.04.12 19:06:56 12.04.12 21:27:34 0.90 21.1 / 0.0 BETA_ cfsw_ 0003_ 00003646_ 0-- 605 Error 12.04.12 18:29:36 12.04.12 18:56:00 0.00 109.1 / 0.0 error message of wingman _1: process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/devi...Log.do?resultId=892612685 error message of wingman _0: exit code -529697949 (0xe06d7363) Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Out Of Memory (C++ Exception) (0xe06d7363) at address 0x75E6B9BC https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/devi...Log.do?resultId=892552331 Not sure if those links work. One of those logs looked too long to post it here. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Third and final beta completed here on an I7 980X in 3:37:00 elapsed (9 CEP2 tasks "and some other things" running simultaneously with it) - successful, pending validation.
----------------------------------------Makes me wish my Q9550 would have pulled one...here, at least, the Intel I7 series doesn't seem to have any problems with this beta with the note that no betas here had to run under any memory constraints and all of them were in a "use CPU always" configuration. (Edit: All betas here ran under Win7 Ultimate x64.) [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 14, 2012 10:23:09 AM] |
||
|
|
|