Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 85
Posts: 85   Pages: 9   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 10063 times and has 84 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7)

This separate observation would have been good to make in a new thread in the CEP2 forum. :D

If I understand correctly, you had CEP2 *de-selected* in that profile, but down below, the override set to *unlimited*. Could speculate, but speculation it's all it is, maybe the script makes it go back to default 1, when there's an active project reshuffle AND CEP2 is *not* selected?

Certainly, I've de- and re-selected CEP2 so many times to help fetch of Beta and DDDT2, saved the profile and on re-selection of CEP2, the override number staying unwavering at the preferred number. Just tried it with *unlimited* and selecting, de-selecting, re-selecting, with saves in between, and the *unlimited* stuck. Really could not say if there is a bug here. Now that HFCC has been moved to active, CEP2 staying selected on my profiles and the preferred number of CEP2 to be cached not changing, it's waiting on members to report on allocated work dropping to 1. The same observation may then maybe also occur when next Project X launches. There's the time recording issue left to solve, so hopefully it wont be too long to happen, helping stretch the remaining run days on HFCC, for those that have little crunching resources and a higher badge goal. :))))

Thanks for warning, coolstream... we'll be homed in on this in the event. Production was as stable as the first law on thermodynamics [conservation of energy]... no red face smiley posts yet :D

--//--

edit: spell biggrin 'too', with double o biggrin
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 20, 2011 10:35:57 AM]
[Aug 20, 2011 10:32:28 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kffitzgerald
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 29, 2011
Post Count: 222
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) several Inconclusive Status

actually I have been getting some, and have already added a nother day to my total on the project, up to 1 yr and 91 days now, going for the next badge 2 yrs
[Aug 20, 2011 12:00:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
coolstream
Senior Cruncher
SCOTLAND
Joined: Nov 8, 2005
Post Count: 475
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7)

This separate observation would have been good to make in a new thread in the CEP2 forum. :D

I didn't want to start a 'panic' for something that I couldn't be 100% uncertain about, so I went with uplinger's request to post if we 'noticed anything'.
If I understand correctly, you had CEP2 *de-selected* in that profile, but down below, the override set to *unlimited*.

NO. I actually continue to have CEP selected to process 'when available'.
Could speculate, but speculation it's all it is, maybe the script makes it go back to default 1, when there's an active project reshuffle AND CEP2 is *not* selected?

That was my thought too, although I would have thought: 'the script makes it go back to default 1, when there's an active project reshuffle AND CEP2 *is* selected' would be the question.
Certainly, I've de- and re-selected CEP2 so many times to help fetch of Beta and DDDT2, saved the profile and on re-selection of CEP2, the override number staying unwavering at the preferred number. Just tried it with *unlimited* and selecting, de-selecting, re-selecting, with saves in between, and the *unlimited* stuck. Really could not say if there is a bug here. Now that HFCC has been moved to active, CEP2 staying selected on my profiles and the preferred number of CEP2 to be cached not changing, it's waiting on members to report on allocated work dropping to 1.

Yes, but it certainly isn't worth making the project Inactive again for long enough to make changes to a profile just to test the question.
The same observation may then maybe also occur when next Project X launches. There's the time recording issue left to solve, so hopefully it wont be too long to happen, helping stretch the remaining run days on HFCC, for those that have little crunching resources and a higher badge goal. :))))

Thanks for warning, coolstream... we'll be homed in on this in the event. Production was as stable as the first law on thermodynamics [conservation of energy]... no red face smiley posts yet :D

wink I have changed the CEP settings back to unlimited and will observe if this happens again if another project switches back to being Active.

I haven't checked the CEP forum to see if you have posted about this yet, but if not, I will make a post there too.

EDIT: I have made a post in CEP forum about this.
----------------------------------------

Crunching in memory of my Mum PEGGY, cousin ROPPA and Aunt AUDREY.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by coolstream at Aug 20, 2011 2:07:28 PM]
[Aug 20, 2011 1:31:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1670
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

Hi,
today, I had several errored WUs:
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00187187_ target-7_ 0001_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00185653_ target-7_ 0001_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00185048_ target-7_ 0000_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00178693_ target-7_ 0000_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00178269_ target-7_ 0001_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00173007_ target-7_ 0000_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00172981_ target-7_ 0001_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00170259_ target-7_ 0000_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00170728_ target-7_ 0000_ 0--
  • HFCC_ target-7_ 00171582_ target-7_ 0001_ 0--

All WUs have a similar error message:
<core_client_version>6.10.17</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
SIGILL: illegal instruction
Stack trace (11 frames):
[0x80b3d1b]
[0x811ab78]
[0xf77fc400]
[0x80e4f38]
[0x80a95bc]
[0x80a9d54]
[0x807a20a]
[0x80a5483]
[0x80a6be3]
[0x811cc7a]
[0x8048131]
Exiting...
</stderr_txt>
]]>

The concerned host is a Phenom II x6, Ubuntu 10.04 x64.
The same system computed successfully other "target-7" WUs during the last days.
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Aug 22, 2011 4:22:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1670
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

In between I had on the same host around 30 errored WUs with the same failure and later successfully computed HFCC WUs.
Strange ! thinking
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Aug 23, 2011 9:02:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

SIGILL: illegal instruction

I'm thinking to either ditch Linux [W7-64 anyway giving me 99% efficiency on CEP2) or go to a real bare bones Linux, just for pure crunching. I'm starting to get sick of these 4 simultaneous Signal 11's everytime the WIFI has a connection hickup. The efficiency of validated hours has dropped to 61% due this as at yesterday.

--//--
[Aug 23, 2011 10:26:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1670
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

Hi SekeRob,
It is widely a WCG only wired host (no wifi).
I am not sure if it could be a temperature problem (although the host is properly cooled) since we experience currently really hot weather.
During the SIGILL problem with HFCC, other projects (HCMD2, CEP2) have been successfully crunched on the same host.
Finally I rebooted the host.
Cheers,
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Aug 24, 2011 12:26:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dango
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jul 27, 2009
Post Count: 307
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

why became project to startum 2?
[Aug 24, 2011 7:16:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3294
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

Probably your computer is going to be tested which is why a second copy will be sent.

It should go back to normal once the inconclusives are validated
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Aug 24, 2011 8:04:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
dango
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jul 27, 2009
Post Count: 307
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Test batch for new HFCC target (target-7) ERRORED WUs

falconet, it looks:

HFCC_ target-7_ 00184532_ target-7_ 0000_ 1-- - In Progress 21.8.2011 23:18:04 31.8.2011 23:18:04 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
HFCC_ target-7_ 00184532_ target-7_ 0000_ 0-- 640 Pending Validation 21.8.2011 23:16:25 24.8.2011 19:01:39 3.66 64.4 / 0.0

and another valid:

HFCC_ target-7_ 00180959_ target-7_ 0000_ 1-- 640 Valid 21.8.2011 23:51:41 22.8.2011 21:04:21 3.75 64.9 / 67.9
HFCC_ target-7_ 00180959_ target-7_ 0000_ 0-- 640 Valid 21.8.2011 23:49:41 24.8.2011 19:01:39 4.02 70.9 / 67.9
[Aug 25, 2011 8:08:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 85   Pages: 9   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread