| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Computing for Clean Water 64 bit |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 81
|
|
| Author |
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2977 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Well, the four that I managed to snag from the original 1000, finally finished - although were a lot, lot, lot longer than the others that are being reported here.
----------------------------------------As I hadn't rebooted my machine for 14 days, I've taken the opportunity to do so (after performing some Windows updates), and I've now managed to snag 4 more - so, we'll see as to how these go... The results of the original 4, were; Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061007963_ 0-- Valid 24/02/11 03:17:56 24/02/11 17:55:20 13.84 238.5 / 88.5 BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061008351_ 0-- Valid 24/02/11 03:17:56 24/02/11 17:55:20 13.76 237.1 / 88.4 BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061000667_ 0-- Valid 24/02/11 03:19:58 24/02/11 17:48:51 13.65 253.2 / 88.2 BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061009217_ 0-- Valid 24/02/11 03:17:56 24/02/11 17:46:29 13.58 273.1 / 88.0  [Edit 1 times, last edit by gb009761 at Feb 24, 2011 8:19:41 PM] |
||
|
|
andreic
Advanced Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 19, 2004 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I've got an issue. I had two WUs waiting on one of my systems (Mac Mini with BOINC 6.10.58 and beta12 version 616), I started the WUs and they immediately crashed with computation errors.
These were BETA_c4cw_target03_061014534_0 and BETA_c4cw_target03_061015037_0. The remnants have been posted back to the servers. |
||
|
|
andreic
Advanced Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 19, 2004 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I just got four more and they also blew. BETA_c4cw_target03_061029592_0, BETA_c4cw_target03_061027088_0, BETA_c4cw_target03_061023005_0, and BETA_c4cw_target03_061022364_0.
And another one, BETA_c4cw_target03_061022776_0. All say "Output file BETA_c4cw_target03_..._0_0 for task BETA_c4cw_target03_..._0 absent" |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
andreic,
Can you please post your stderr log in the result status page? anhhai, Your processor on that machine is 64 bit. I feel that your operating system is running 64 bit as well. Can you please take a look at your stderrdae.txt and look for a line similar to this... 2/21/2011 9:49:28 AM Starting BOINC client version 6.10.58 for windows_intelx86 The reason I suspect this is that if you were running 32 bit OS, then the application should have crashed instantly when trying to run it. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
If the client is 32 bits, the other line 15-20 further down says something like this:
22-02-2011 07:51 OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Home Premium x86 Edition, Service Pack 1, v.721, (06.01.7601.00) |
||
|
|
Ingleside
Veteran Cruncher Norway Joined: Nov 19, 2005 Post Count: 974 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Think btw, that someone (Ingleside?) commented that a 64 bit client is not a requirement, just the OS needing to be 64 bit, but could be mistaken. Yes, starting with the v6.10.xx-version of clients, it doesn't matter if the BOINC-client is 32-bit or not. It will still report the "main" OS-platform, and for anyone running a 64-bit windows-OS this will be "windows_x86_64". Now, if this change was included for all v6.10.xx-clients, or maybe just the later ones I don't remember, but a quick test reveals that atleast with the 32-bit v6.10.58 (didn't test the WCG-one) it's reporting as 64-bit platform, and SIMAP happily downloaded some 64-bit-application-work.  "I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might." |
||
|
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1317 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Results of the BETA's compared to production tasks:
----------------------------------------Linux64 on Intel Core2 Duo P8400 @ 2.26GHz BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061000342_ 1-- 999763 Pending 24/02/11 03:19:31 24/02/11 11:19:59 (04:56:05) 04:44:45 99.4 / 0.0 <-- BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061004611_ 1-- 999763 Valid 24/02/11 08:57:05 24/02/11 13:58:24 (04:35:45) 04:25:15 92.8 / 89.6 v6.15 c4cw_ target03_ 055400613_ 1-- 999763 Pending 24/02/11 13:39:44 24/02/11 19:31:25 (04:45:53) 04:41:08 98.8 / 0.0 v6.15 c4cw_ target03_ 055427473_ 0-- 999763 Valid 24/02/11 13:37:24 24/02/11 19:28:53 (04:44:47) 04:40:13 98.5 / 88.1 Windows 7 x64 on AMD Athlon II X4 630 @ 2.95GHz BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061000337_ 1-- 1430653 Valid 24/02/11 07:56:33 24/02/11 11:55:52 (03:44:20) 03:43:46 73.8 / 87.4 BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061002252_ 1-- 1430653 Valid 24/02/11 07:58:34 24/02/11 11:55:52 (03:44:21) 03:43:59 73.8 / 87.4 v6.15 c4cw_ target03_ 055406218_ 1-- 1430653 Pending 24/02/11 13:47:57 24/02/11 17:52:17 (04:03:20) 04:03:05 80.5 / 0.0 v6.15 c4cw_ target03_ 055444318_ 0-- 1430653 Valid 24/02/11 13:46:12 24/02/11 17:52:53 (04:03:49) 04:03:06 80.5 / 78.9 The first Linux64 Beta has a strange runtime. Looking to the results it says, it was running version 6.15: Result Log Result Name: BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061000342_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.17</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Commandline = ../../projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcg_beta12_lmps_6.15_i686-pc-linux-gnu -screen none -in in.wcg.acc -var wcgsteps1 10000 -var wcgsteps2 10000 -var loop 0 -var restart 0 -var rinterval 100 -var ifile in.wcg.acc -var wcgseed 61000342 [07:23:03] Percent complete = 0.499975 [07:24:30] Percent complete = 0.999950 etc...  |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2977 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The later four I got, are currently running a heck of a lot faster than the first batch... So far, at around the 33% stage, they've taken ~2 hrs...
----------------------------------------BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061017835_ 0-- BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061015805_ 0-- BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061015155_ 0-- BETA_ c4cw_ target03_ 061010808_ 0-- |
||
|
|
andreic
Advanced Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 19, 2004 Post Count: 100 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Uplinger,
I sent a file to support@worldcommunitygrid.org. It was way too big to post here. Andrei |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ok, I have figured out the issue with some members noticing 32 bit versions of the code. If you have a 32 bit machine that received work. Please take a look at the stderr and it will show 6.15 as the version number. About 150 work units in the first batch of 1000 were sent out using the old binary. This was a mistake on my part. I had loaded the work and then updated the application versions.
Version 6.16 runs only on 64 bit :). If you see 6.15, then these work units were part of my mistake. Again, sorry for the confusion and thank you for your help! -Uplinger |
||
|
|
|