Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 156
Posts: 156   Pages: 16   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 461323 times and has 155 replies Next Thread
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Harpertowns do not have hyperthreading. 8x24=192 hrs minus a little from disk writing and switching wu's. But almost 50% time loss is unacceptable and wasteful. I did have the disks to spin down when possible but shouldn't have ate that much time. 8gb ram so that's not an issue. SATA hard drive so no issues there. I switched back to clean water and my crunching time is back to normal. Would have to suggest it's the project with issues.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Oct 4, 2010 1:22:03 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused Re: Poor crunching on this project

Hi I am getting similar results in one of my linux desktops, all the CEP2 tasks are arround 2-3hr, on the other one thimes are 5 or 10 hours per result and both are identical machines Pentium D 3 Gz 2 GB RAM with Ubuntu
[Oct 4, 2010 2:19:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Disk spin down is not a good idea when crunching. Advise to switch that power saving feature off.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Oct 4, 2010 2:24:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
krahulik
Cruncher
Joined: Nov 23, 2006
Post Count: 5
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Hi I am getting similar results in one of my linux desktops, all the CEP2 tasks are arround 2-3hr, on the other one thimes are 5 or 10 hours per result and both are identical machines Pentium D 3 Gz 2 GB RAM with Ubuntu

I have the same problem on UBUNTU desktop. All the reported CEP2 tasks are 2-3 hrs instead of 8-10 hrs now. I remember an automatic system update few day ago confused
I switched the computer on WIN7 and other project devilish
----------------------------------------

[Oct 4, 2010 4:40:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Bearcat
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 6, 2007
Post Count: 2803
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Disk spin down is not a good idea when crunching. Advise to switch that power saving feature off.


I did. Still think its the project and possibly ubuntu. Its not doing tbe same thing on clean water project.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!

[Oct 4, 2010 10:08:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Related, unrelated, my Linux Lucid client was updated to the 260.19.06 NVidia driver sometime last week. Anything GPU in BOINC is disabled on that host.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/655139
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Oct 5, 2010 5:16:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Related, unrelated, my Linux Lucid client was updated to the 260.19.06 NVidia driver sometime last week. Anything GPU in BOINC is disabled on that host.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/655139


That could possibly be a mismatch between the older CUDA runtime library used by the GPU BOINC projects and the new driver.

Something like that happened to me a few months ago when I installed a new Nvidia driver and Collatz stopped running on my machine. Collatz doesn't provide the CUDA runtime library for Linux, so the user has to compile and install it herself. Therefore in that case, it was easy for me to just recompile the runtime against the new driver, and Collatz was up and running again.

I haven't installed new Nvidia drivers since I started running GPUgrid, so I don't know whether I"ll have problems with that project after updating drivers. I assume GPUgrid supplies the CUDA runtime, because I didn't have to provide it myself to run GPUgrid. So I can easily see how installing a newer driver could cause a mismatch with an older runtime supplied by them.
----------------------------------------

[Oct 5, 2010 8:37:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: May 21, 2007
Post Count: 391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

Related, unrelated, my Linux Lucid client was updated to the 260.19.06 NVidia driver sometime last week. Anything GPU in BOINC is disabled on that host.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/655139

I've upgraded my Linux Lucid from 195.35 to 260.19.06 without any issues. I got my upgrade x-swat ppa though.

Now back to the topic, Here's my performance report - given linux is in usb; boinc executables and data in hd with ext3 partition:
OCZ Rally2 16GB - GRADE: A
Read: Min: 29.6MB/s Max: 31.3MB/s Ave: 30.8MB/s Access Time: 0.589ms

SanDisk Cruzer Mini 4GB GRADE: B+
Read: Min: 13.7MB/s Max: 16.7MB/s Ave: 16.5MB/s Access Time: 0.655ms

SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB GRADE: C
Read: Min: 12.7MB/s Max: 16.5MB/s Ave: 15.7MB/s Access Time: 1.05ms

HP v125w 8GB GRADE: B
Read: Min: 22.2MB/s Max: 22.7MB/s Ave: 22.7MB/s Access Time: 0.736ms

OCZ Rally 4GB GRADE: A-
Read: Min: 23.6MB/s Max: 31.2MB/s Ave: 29.8MB/s Access Time: 0.829ms


After trashing all this linux usb stuff, performance has sky rocketed.
----------------------------------------

[Oct 5, 2010 9:08:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

You're saying now that you don't have these big differentials anymore?
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Oct 5, 2010 9:33:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: May 21, 2007
Post Count: 391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Poor crunching on this project

You're saying now that you don't have these big differentials anymore?

Somewhat at par with windows crunching.

i7 920 and wcg only:


i7 920/gtx260(2x) and wcg/seti


q6600/gtx260(2x) and wcg/seti


i7920/gtx260(x2) and wcg/gpugrid

----------------------------------------

[Oct 5, 2010 10:05:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 156   Pages: 16   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread