Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 45
Posts: 45   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 143881 times and has 44 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

same here - 3 have complete and 4th is going well.

Then again I have had only rare errors on the three that ran/are running the Betas (2 Intel duos and AMD quad, XP on all). The Celeron so far has never errored out
[Apr 13, 2010 1:21:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

Never a dull moment, but these logs are so not talking ... armstrdj, can you please add some energy data or checkpoints or what OS the result is run on (since HPF2 is not homogeneous redundancy bound), people might find it interesting to see who ran what at what run time. Then we can start our own who's got the fattest fold type brag threads.

Thanks

Result Log

Result Name: BETA_ ng591_ 00006_ 12--
<core_client_version>6.10.43</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Apr 13, 2010 1:22:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Hypernova
Master Cruncher
Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland
Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Post Count: 1908
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

I was lucky enough to get about a hundred Beta WU's. sad

All those which have been crunched up to now (17) ended in ERROR.
They all have the same error text, see here under:

Result Log
Result Name: BETA_ ng592_ 00030_ 1--
<core_client_version>6.10.18</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
CreateProcess() failed - Acc refus (0x5)
</message>
]]>


They run on two type of CPU's i7 950 and i7 980X.
OS is Window 7 64 bit Ultimate.

I am afraid it is a 100 shot for nothing.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Hypernova at Apr 13, 2010 1:26:25 PM]
[Apr 13, 2010 1:25:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

If you're on HT, take a rig and switch that off plz if it still got any Beta in queue to start.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Apr 13, 2010 1:32:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rembertw
Senior Cruncher
Belgium
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Post Count: 275
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

My beta's seem to be running fine, all under XP and in PV for now.

I did notice that most WU's (if not all) do have about a 15% fail rate in the quorum.
[Apr 13, 2010 2:00:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

I had 2 W7 64bit quads that HPF2 failed on regularly. All BETAs on these two machines ran successfully with HFCC and FAH running along side.
[Apr 13, 2010 3:39:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher
Canada
Joined: May 21, 2007
Post Count: 391
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

If you're on HT, take a rig and switch that off plz if it still got any Beta in queue to start.

I don't think HT is the cause. I have no issues with my i7 920 HT ON (2 rigs). Although my 3rd rig (i7 920 HT ON) has issues on the 1st 6WU it crunched but the next 10WU was a success. The only thing I change is add an AV exception to the slots dir. The other 2 rigs i meantioned already have an exception, thus no errors.
----------------------------------------

[Apr 13, 2010 3:56:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
themoonscrescent
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Jul 1, 2006
Post Count: 1320
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

No problem with the 8 or 9 I did on my 870 (Win7 64bit HT On), they worked sometime along side HCC and also for a short time with all 8 cores running nothing but Beta.
----------------------------------------


[Apr 13, 2010 4:39:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

First one of 6 validated, odded by the mention of 15 percent fail on wingmen as reported earlier in this thread. So far going through all 6 distribution sets see 1 with a 7-11 and one with an unrelated never seen before error [run out of memory], thus from my point of view the fail rate is low. Here one set, 16 returned, 3 in IP.

BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 15-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:40 13-4-10 16:03:32 3.67 74.2 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 16-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:45 13-4-10 15:25:46 4.19 114.5 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 5-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:33 13-4-10 14:41:41 10.98 96.2 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 14-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:43 13-4-10 13:41:47 5.02 79.3 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 9-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:38 13-4-10 12:25:26 3.39 64.0 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 17-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:50 13-4-10 11:34:49 6.59 82.1 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 4-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:31 13-4-10 11:14:35 3.77 74.1 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 3-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:32 13-4-10 11:10:18 4.02 95.3 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 7-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:40 13-4-10 10:22:26 3.25 61.7 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 18-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:50 13-4-10 10:20:15 4.21 92.1 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 12-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:40 13-4-10 09:45:55 4.70 59.5 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 0-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:28 13-4-10 09:43:36 6.75 68.4 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 10-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:39 13-4-10 09:18:52 4.32 60.9 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 1-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:31 13-4-10 08:25:14 3.61 84.1 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 8-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:36 13-4-10 05:50:44 3.57 60.6 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 13-- 617 Valid 12-4-10 22:02:41 13-4-10 03:52:44 5.27 114.5 / 79.7
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 11-- - In Progress 12-4-10 22:02:40 15-4-10 22:02:40 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 6-- - In Progress 12-4-10 22:02:39 15-4-10 22:02:39 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
BETA_ ng593_ 00001_ 2-- - In Progress 12-4-10 22:02:35 15-4-10 22:02:35 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

Let it rip, even if it's 50% less 711 than there was 411... it would still be many hundreds reduction daily of the 1 minute experience.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Apr 13, 2010 4:48:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1452
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta Test for HPF2 - version 6.17

So far no problems from machine that had occasional errors (See "No Funny" thread). 3/4 WUs are pending validation.
----------------------------------------
[Apr 13, 2010 4:53:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 45   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread