| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
|
| Author |
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Incidentally it's 3.77C colder
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It's official March 2013 Central England average temperature was 2.7C (joint 12th lowest)
----------------------------------------http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/mly_cet_mean_sort.txt The last time it was that cold in the month of March was 1892 121 years ago To find a lower temp you have to go back to 1770 Dave ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Apr 1, 2013 11:49:23 AM] |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The year to date average CET temperature of 3.13C places 2013 joint 74th lowest temperature in the last 355 years alongside 1807 and 1864
----------------------------------------4.23C below the peak in 1990 ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Apr 1, 2013 11:47:38 AM] |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Don't forget though the Planet is warming at an alarming unprecedented rate.
----------------------------------------The Climate "Scientists" say it is so it must be true. They say it is warming because of the 0.03968% of the atmosphere that is Carbon Dioxide and not only that there are positive feedback loops that amplify this effect into a catastrophic runaway warming that will raise the average temperature by 6C by the end of this very same Century. So far I have not seen any evidence of this CO2 effect, as a result I very much doubt that any of us will If this March was as cold as one in 1892 where's the warming I was promised? ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Apr 1, 2013 12:08:06 PM] |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
(Fukushima has spewed much more radioactive cesium and iodine than Chernobyl. The amount of radioactive cesium released by Fukushima was some 20-30 times higher than initially admitted. Japanese experts say that Fukushima is currently releasing up to 93 billion becquerels of radioactive cesium into the ocean each day. And the cesium levels hitting the west coast of North America will keep increasing for several years. Fukushima is still spewing radiation into the environment, and the amount of radioactive fuel at Fukushima dwarfs Chernobyl.)
----------------------------------------As such, the concept of “background radiation” is largely a misnomer. Most of the radiation we encounter today – especially the most dangerous types – did not even exist in nature before we started tinkering with nuclear weapons and reactors. In a sense, we are all guinea pigs. http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2013-04-...ompared-bananas-or-x-rays |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hi Gerald
----------------------------------------And yet here in the UK we can build new Nuclear Power Stations but not new Coal Power Stations The reason behind this logic - Man Made Global Warming See first post in thread I still stand by my initial statement back in Oct 2009 "It takes true genius to turn coal fired power stations into a greater menace than their nuclear cousins!" ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by David Autumns at Apr 2, 2013 9:02:55 AM] |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Hi Gerald And yet here in the UK we can build new Nuclear Power Stations but not new Coal Power Stations The reason behind this logic - Man Made Global Warming See first post in thread I still stand by my initial statement back in Oct 2009 "It takes true genius to turn coal fired power stations into a greater menace than their nuclear cousins!" Glad to see you back crunching full time Dave i really am afraid of what will happen in the future--i dont know how the folks in Europe can survive AGW--over here any extra money goes in the gas tank--just to get to work--i am very worried about the future generations of the human race ![]() |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Warmists Wonder If Global Warming Is Making European Winters Cold http://www.thepiratescove.us/2013/03/28/warmi...ng-european-winters-cold/
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Radium and You
----------------------------------------Radior wasn't the only company marketing trace amounts of dangerous radioactive substances: Thoradia & others packaged radium (and thorium, hence the name) into some astonishing products. Many of them were beauty aids, creams, lotions, soaps, etc. The most striking ad is this one http://vintage-ads.livejournal.com/2997827.html [Edit 1 times, last edit by GeraldRube at Apr 3, 2013 1:52:42 PM] |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Mythanol
----------------------------------------Add a magical substance to your car’s gasoline and it produces less carbon dioxide, and since it – ethanol -- is made right here in the USA, it helps reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Sounds too good to be true? Well it is, on both counts and more. Ethanol is an alcohol that is made from cellulose; the current favored cellulose source in the US is corn, of which we grow lots. The problems start with the math. Turns out it costs slightly more than a gallon of petroleum (or its equivalent) to produce a gallon of ethanol: The fertilizer is made from natural gas; the farm equipment needed to grow and harvest the corn burns gasoline or diesel; the processing plant is powered by electricity, using hydrocarbon fuel for process heating. So much for reducing our dependence on oil or reducing carbon footprint (even if you believe that stuff). Also turns out that ethanol has only 2/3 the energy content of gasoline So that your gallon of ethanol is only worth 2/3 of the gallon+ of fossil fuel it took to make it. Now there’s efficiency! Doing the math, 10% ethanol at the pump results in a mileage drop in your car of about 4.5%. So you need to buy more of it to go the same distance. At this point, few would still argue that “gasohol” really accomplishes its intended purpose, but the corn growers’ and ethanol producers’ lobbies are of such strength now that ‘m afraid it will be a long time before we see it phased out. In fact they are pushing for 15% ethanol! Just what we need. Maybe November offers hope. Back to the technical, to those of you with older boats that incorporate epoxy fiberglass gasoline tanks in the hull – don’t even think of filling up with gasohol. The ethanol contained slowly dissolves the epoxy resin, eventually causing disintegration of the tank, resulting in gasoline leaks into your bilge – very bad! And guess where that dissolving resin goes when running your boat – right into the engine; also very bad unless you were looking to replace the engine anyway. Older, small equipment engines, such as in Weedeaters and lawn mowers, can also be damaged by gasohol, which can dissolve hoses and some plastic parts. And, finally, ethanol loves water. The humidity that enters your boat’s (newer cars have a sealed cap to prevent this) tank twice daily with the air’s heating and cooling, condenses in the tank and is absorbed by the ethanol until it is saturated and separates out, sinking to the bottom of the tank where it can rust steel tanks and be sucked up into the engine, which is not designed to burn water and alcohol. And back to the economics, since a significant part of the nation’s corn crop is going into our gas tanks that leaves much less for food – all the corn-based products we consume plus what we feed our nation’s livestock. Have you noticed the price of food lately? It also reduces our available corn export, which is normally a nice, positive, trade balance component. There are still a few places where you can find non-ethanol gas. Go to http://pure-gas.org/index.jsp?stateprov=VA to locate the nearest to you. If you are not a Virginian, replace the last two letters of the address with your state’s abbreviation. I have found the cost of non-ethanol gas to be only slightly higher than gasohol at service stations. However, it is a lot higher at Marinas (but then what would you expect?) I wish you good hunting. Illegitimi non Carborundum! [Edit 1 times, last edit by GeraldRube at Apr 3, 2013 7:42:29 PM] |
||
|
|
|