That's Satire

Unfortunately this isn't http://www.eaem.co.uk/news/davey-takes-climate-sceptics

Hurrah !

See below

The annual audit is taking it's time. I have to put it on the back burner as I have yet another new job and will be moving again over the next month or so.

It would be great if I did this for a living...but I don't, I'm really a big oil shill (<-- to explain ... this is comic sarcasm and not a confession LOL please don't try to use this against me in an argument as you will look like a fool - I'm a Voice Consultant, Voice as in VoIP)
I'm moving North back to my home County of Yorkshire - I'll lose about 2C in average temperature As they say "It's grim up north"

Still with this one they are throwing in a car. One that will do 74.3 mpg ( 61.9 miles per gallon US or 26.3 km/l in metric) Given the state of my current one and the price of fuel ... this is great news !!!!

That Wikipedia link on VoIP is pretty poor quality by the way

Sek

How's the warming in Italy?




Dave

kirkmyers says:
February 16, 2013 at 2:19 pm

NOAA NCDC and NASA GISS continue to manipulate land-based temperature data and have been doing so for years. It’s all about politics. The higher-ups in both agencies realize they must advance the global warming agenda in order to justify higher levels of funding for their agencies (and preserve their jobs). Their role as scientists (I use the term loosely) has given way to fundraising. Their primary role is to keep the money flowing. And the best way to do it is by creating a climate of fear vis a vis the AGW scare. Their self-serving agendas truly are a disgrace to science.

By the way, as you’ve pointed out again and again, there has been no statistically significant global warming for 16 years, even as CO2 levels have climbed. Ergo, the theory of CO2-induced warming has been falsified. (And where is the predicted hot spot in the troposphere above the tropics?)
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/more-ushcn-adjustment-fraud/
The general circulation models (GCMs) at NOAA and NASA are a clear example of GIGO (garbage in, garbage out). How can either agency possibly hope to model the impact of water vapor and clouds, cosmic rays, solar flux changes and other naturally occurring variables? The climate on planet Earth is a chaotic, non-linear system. There isn’t a computer smart enough or fast enough to model Mother Nature.

Try this

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21238363

Then maybe you will understand the pain of taxes claimed in the name of an essential trace gas making up less than 0.04% of the atmosphere.

and then there's this

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21598504

The February 2013 result is in and the average temperature from 2542 NOAA Weather Stations around the Globe was 3.50C

Jan 2011 1.37C
Feb 2011 2.85C
Mar 2011 6.93C
Apr 2011 12.25C
May 2011 16.16C
Jun 2011 20.45C
Jul 2011 22.83C
Aug 2011 22.19C
Sep 2011 18.72C
Oct 2011 13.50C
Nov 2011 8.32C
Dec 2011 4.78C
Jan 2012 3.26C
Feb 2012 3.84C
Mar 2012 9.71C
Apr 2012 12.45C
May 2012 17.32C
Jun 2012 20.59C
Jul 2012 23.13C
Aug 2012 22.11C
Sep 2012 18.44C
Oct 2012 13.28C
Nov 2012 7.97C
Dec 2012 4.11C
Jan 2013 2.65C
Feb 2013 3.50C

J-D 2011 12.584C
F-J 2012 12.745C
M-F 2012 12.795C
A-M 2012 13.031C
M-A 2012 13.048C
J-M 2012 13.145C
J-J 2012 13.156C
A-J 2012 13.180C
S-A 2012 13.174C
O-S 2012 13.151C
N-O 2012 13.133C
D-N 2012 13.104C
J-D 2012 13.047C
F-J 2013 12.995C
M-F 2013 12.997C

Here it is as a forum friendly sized graph that updates hourly



The graph above is (at this moment in time) the result of 48,336,204
individual temperature measurements taken around the Globe since the beginning of 2011

Note: all of the above is preliminary. I'm still working through the annual audit at the moment so that we keep comparing apples with apples. (Little hiccup at the moment as I have just moved jobs (to big oil ) and currently "of no fixed abode" - my number crunchers are in storage)