http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYnd5JRu86E

Al Gore hopes he has reality on his side. But the reality is the relentless slide of the polls. It’s the crashed Chicago Climate Exchange, the kaput green jobs. It’s the long list of countries who are are shaking themselves free of the eco-shackles. The apostles of a bygone cult are reduced to saying that warming causes cooling, death, disease and even prostitution in Ghana. The babbling last players standing are talking about saving the world from aliens. Sadly, those are not the nutters, no, they’re the ones from NASA.

The NASA crew worry that the aliens who have been blind to the last 60 years of I love Lucy beamed out to space, have instead been transfixed by a trace gas composition change from 0.028% to 0.039% on the third rock from the sun in a distant galaxy. I’m scared now, not of the aliens, but of our collapsing collective IQ. This is modern public debate (and from the team that got the man on the moon.)

Gore’s seedy scare will be viewed in history books as we marvel at Fowlers Arsenic Cure now.

Gore is the modern witchdoctor incarnate, armed with special effects, no scruples and buckets of money. He knows he’s losing the war with the thinkers, he’s given up even trying to win the educated. Now it’s straight from the Saul Alinsky Reed Coray:
September 14th, 2011 at 3:14 am

Jo, you mention NASA’s fear of aliens destroying the Earth because the level of the trace gas CO2 has increased in the last 60 years. On 29 August 2011, Anthony Watts graciously allowed me guest post priviliges on his blog WattsUpWithThat. Below is a copy of that guest post. I know many of your readers also read Anthony’s blog; but for those who don’t, I thought they might be interested.

Two members of the Penn State University faculty (Seth D. Baum and Jacob D. Haqq-Misra) and one employee of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman) have taken valuable time to address the issue of how mankind might deal with beneficent, neutral and hostile Extraterrestrial Intelligence (ETI). The aforementioned concerned citizens authored an article appearing in the Journal Acta Astronautica (volume 68, 2011, pages 2114-2129). The title of that article was: “Would contact with extraterrestrials benefit or harm humanity? A scenario analysis.” I would like to provide assistance to those gentlemen so that they may continue their important work with minimal interruption. To that end, I have written two messages that will (a) help ensure ETIs do not disrupt their important work, and (b) remove the need for those gentlemen to devote their valuable time to the generation of comparable messages. Subject to the approval of Penn State University, NASA, and the authors of the referenced Acta Astronautica article, I recommend these messages be broadcast to space in all human languages.
Reed Coray

PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE MESSAGE OF THE FIRST KIND

To: Ecosystem-Valuing Universalist Extraterrestrial Intelligence Possessing The Capacity To Harm Or Destroy The Earth Or Any Portion Thereof (EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPT)

From: The faculty/staff of Penn State University and the employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Date: Gregorian: 2011-08-28; Julian: 2455801.5; Modified Julian: 55801; Hebrew: 5771-Av 28; Chinese: 2011-07-29; Islamic: 1432-Ramadan-28; ISO-8601: 2011-34-7;
Persian: 1390-Shahrivar-6; Mayan Long Count: 12.19.18.11.19; Indian Civil: 1933-Bhadra-6; Unix: 1314489600; Excel Serial Day Number, 1900 Date System
(PC): 40783;Excel Serial Day Number, 1904 Date System (Macintosh): 39321

Subject: Precautionary Principle Plea of the First Kind

Whereas:
(1) EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs might exist,

(2) EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs might be observing/monitoring (a) the composition of Earth’s atmosphere and (b) electromagnetic radiation emanating from the Earth,

(3) Observations might be limited to the last 100 orbits of the Earth about its star (Sun)– Note: We call one orbit of the Earth about the Sun a “year”,

(4) Observations over the last 100 years show a small increase in the level of the atmospheric trace gas carbon dioxide (CO2),

(5) EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs might conclude that the small increase in the level of the atmospheric trace gas CO2 is due to wicked practices of the dominant Earth species (mankind),

(6) EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs might conclude that the small increase in the level of the atmospheric trace gas CO2 is known by mankind to be harmful to the Earth’s environment,

(7) EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs might conclude that based on the harmful effect of the small increase in the level of the atmospheric trace gas CO2 that mankind is consciously and willfully destroying the Earth’s environment,

(8) Although over the last 30 years most of mankind’s “message-related” electromagnetic radiation (and especially electromagnetic messages emanating from Penn State University and NASA) that discusses:
(a) the small increase in the amount of the atmospheric trace gas CO2, and
(b) its harmful effects on the Earth’s
has been
(i) to deplore mankind’s contribution to the small increase in the level of the atmospheric trace gas CO2,
(ii) to warn against such future behavior, and
(iii) to try to limit/prevent future increases in the level of the atmospheric trace gas CO2,
a small segment of mankind (called deniers) disagrees with and even lies about the net adverse effect on the Earth’s environment of mankind’s small increase in the amount of the atmospheric trace gas CO2, and some of those lies have been transmitted to space in the form of electromagnetic radiation,

(9) Members of the Penn State University faculty and of NASA have written an article [Acta Astronautica, 68 (2011) 2114-2129] demonstrating that at least some of mankind is aware of the possible harm EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs might inflict on the Earth,

We the faculty/staff of Penn State University and the employees of NASA do hereby plead to all EVUETIPTCTHODTEOAPTs: Do not destroy the Earth or mankind; but if you insist on destroying a portion of the Earth, please exempt from that destruction: (a) the faculty/staff of Penn State University, (b) the employees of NASA, and (c) like-minded humans wherever they may reside–collectively known as the “good guys”. If a condition that you not destroy us (the good guys) is that you require we (the good guys) submit a list of the wicked (the bad guys), we (the good guys) will gleefully supply that list–in fact, we (the good guys) have a few names already in mind.

Go with GAIA.

PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE MESSAGE OF THE SECOND KIND
To: Extraterrestrial Intelligence Looking To Destroy Stupidity/Arrogance/Wasteful-Activities Wherever They Might Exist In The Universe (ETILTDSAWAWTMEITU)

From: The faculty/staff of Penn State University and the employees of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Date: Gregorian: 2011-08-28; Julian: 2455801.5; Modified Julian: 55801; Hebrew: 5771-Av 28; Chinese: 2011-07-29; Islamic: 1432-Ramadan-28; ISO-8601: 2011-34-7;
Persian: 1390-Shahrivar-6; Mayan Long Count: 12.19.18.11.19; Indian Civil: 1933-Bhadra-6; Unix: 1314489600; Excel Serial Day Number, 1900 Date System (PC): 40783;
Excel Serial Day Number, 1904 Date System (Macintosh): 39321

Subject: Precautionary Principle Plea of the Second Kind

Whereas ETILTDSAWAWTMEITUs may exist and receive the electromagnetic broadcast of our PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE MESSAGE OF THE FIRST KIND,
We state that the content of our PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE MESSAGE OF THE FIRST KIND was made in jest–ha ha; and we plead that ETILTDSAWAWTMEITUs not destroy the faculty/staff of Penn State University and/or employees of NASA and/or like-minded humans.

http://joannenova.com.au/2011/09/last-ditch-goreathon-scare-smear-and-slur/

The Gore Effect empirically verified

http://91.192.194.209/averagehourlytemp3.png


No sooner had the 24 hours of "Reality" propaganda fest started the Global Temp went into free fall

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gore_Effect

Even the North Pole Sea Ice is making an early recovery (Don't tell Sek )

From my email this morning

Dear Reader,

All of the ‘big six’ energy suppliers have now announced or pushed through price rises adding over £1.61 billion onto household energy
bills. Prices have now increased by 14.2% on average or £161, taking the typical household energy bill up from 1,132 to £1,293.

---

£1,610,000,000 extra taken out of the pockets of just 62,262,000 of us

and that's just from the second increase this year £25.86 from every last Man Woman and Child in the UK

So from this we can see that the annual residential energy business in the UK is now worth £12,930,000,000

and as we found out recently this doesn't cover the cost of building improved infrastructure !!!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/sep/20/chris-huhne-dash-for-gas

Chris Huhne halts 'dash for gas' to keep UK on course for carbon targets. The number of gas-fuelled power plants if left unchecked would break legally binding targets , says energy secretary

"We will not consent so much gas plant so as to endanger our carbon dioxide goals,"

The number of gas-fuelled power plants is increasing rapidly because they are fast and cheap to build compared with alternatives



er... ahm *cough*

If they are fast and cheap to build compared with the alternatives isn't that exactly what you should be deploying Mr Huhne, in your role as Energy Secretary

(see title of thread and the consequences of the 390 ppm)


this is the same Mr Huhne seen in these 2 Youtubes

Before Election

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8re7arPrahU

After Election

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3Sv8GElol8



Good on Siemens btw and good luck to the protesters in Japan


dave