| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2
Thread: anyone else seeing these kinds of errors? I'm getting tons of them. |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 109
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Well if fan noise is the issue, get TThrottle [windows only] and set a max temp so it wont bother, one for day, one for night [2 temps plus time schedule I might propose to the developer]. It will only slow down BOINC science apps or any other app you choose. Installed in 30 seconds, tweaked in minutes.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
ThreadRipper
Veteran Cruncher Sweden Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 1320 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Oh, ok great will try that!
---------------------------------------- Join The International Team: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=CK9RP1BKX1 AMD TR2990WX @ PBO, 64GB Quad 3200MHz 14-17-17-17-1T, RX6900XT @ Stock AMD 3800X @ PBO AMD 2700X @ 4GHz |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Ok.... so I happened to be sitting in front of my system when I noticed this:
---------------------------------------- I thought how interesting it was that all the WU's started at very close to the same time, so I sat and watched the screen for a second, then I noticed this:  Notice anything interesting? That's right, the bottom 7 WU's (light gray lines) are not receiving any CPU time! Oh, how interesting... so I said to my self, "Self, Hmmmm... I think Sekerob once said something about the system possibly needing a reboot... " So I rebooted and here's what happened after the reboot:  No worries, all the tasks are suspended until things get caught up and the WU's all get going again..... (which I hope happens before long...  )Ahhh... much better.. now all the WU's are taking time.... and they seem to be doing well...  Uh Oh... that wasn't good.... ARGH!!!!  Hmmmm... I wonder what will happen next....  Now this is really interesting, all these WU's are playing nicely together... Result Logs Result Name: ni358_ 00026_ 13-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x77E5E23E read attempt to address 0x293BADAC Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: ni365_ 00082_ 9-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x77E5E23E read attempt to address 0x79CB91DD Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: ni365_ 00008_ 0-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x77E5E23E read attempt to address 0x12F80D4C Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: ni347_ 00039_ 5-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x77E5E23E read attempt to address 0x3F97554A Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 </stderr_txt> ]]> Result Name: ni339_ 00004_ 20-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 Unhandled Exception Detected... - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x77E5E23E read attempt to address 0x45CF9CB4 Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger... ERROR:: Exit at: .\dock_structure.cc line:401 </stderr_txt> ]]> I wonder if there's anything the techs can figure out from this? System Config: P6X58D Premimum i7 920 D0 12Gb Corsair memory 5870 1Gb Gaming Video card Wd 1Tb Black 35/35 Mbs Internet SW: Win 7 64 pro Catalist 10.3 Ess 4.0 [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 2, 2010 5:13:02 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Everything has been figured out BB and was beta tested in version 6.17. I think the 1 minute crashes and the no/zero progress loops are intimately related and for both to disappear once 6.17 is approved by the scientists for production. See last update post by Uplinger in that 2-3 days ago.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I got the same errors too when I tried this... I was supprised I cleared my Cache of FAH work in preperation for this. after I got my 2 year badge for FAH lastnight... my old dual core still only on this project (HPF2).. wanted to get this to 2 years quick.. so now I went to HCMD2 to work on getting that one up.. hope this new release is out soon.. so I can redirect 8 cores back to this project and get it to 2 years..
|
|||
|
||||
|
Nevada Bob
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 174 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
<core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version>
----------------------------------------<![CDATA[ <message> too many exit(0)s </message> ]]> I just tried to run HPF-P2 on my 5 computers. I have never had a problem running any WCGrid program before. One of my desktops kept cycling the above error over and over, page after page of errors. I thought it had something to do with Kaspersky Internet Security and the firewall. I did find that I had to tell my other desktop to put the program in the trusted zone. I tried doing that with the other computer but it made no difference. Both desktops are older Dell dual core computers running XP. My solution, thanks to someone's suggestion, was to create a new profile and assign the problem computer to run CMD2 and not allow it to receive any HPF work. I bring this to the attention of the forum and the expert techs to make them aware. Because if I'm having this problem I know many others must be and this thread is evidence of it.  [Edit 1 times, last edit by Nevada Bob at May 19, 2010 6:16:09 AM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
The other thing is of course to exclude the data_dir from scanning. Only BOINC has permission to that area [and any user u permitted] i.e. it's sandboxed, so it's a save action to do. At any rate Too Many Exits could indicate the science app being blocked or the data it's writing, but it must have happened 100x during a task run before it aborts for that reason.
----------------------------------------For that matter, the techs know the old error rates and Uplinger is monitoring how it works out for the new science.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Nevada Bob
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 8, 2008 Post Count: 174 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks,
I did exclude c:/program files/boic from being scanned. That didn't help either. I don't understand why that one computer is affected and not the others. |
|||
|
||||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Ideally, that's exactly where the data_dir should not be. Windows itself does not like constant writing to that structure. Propose you uninstall, re-install 6.2.28 and select to have it placed in C:\ProgramData\BOINC. The location of the core client in C:\Program Files\BOINC should remain as-is.
----------------------------------------As for this path c:/program files/boic think it to be typos, but forward slashes can't be right in Woz and it's BOINC, not boic.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at May 19, 2010 8:11:58 PM] |
||
|
|
|