Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 75
|
![]() |
Author |
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seven work units, all errors, on two computers. QX6700, XP Pro 32 bit and Q6700 Vista Ultimate 64 bit. All ran 14 seconds before error.
----------------------------------------Messages pretty much all say the same thing (except for Failed to get VersionInfo size: - 2 on Vista and 1812 on XP). The Vista machine: <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1 (0xffffffff) </message> <stderr_txt> Failed to get VersionInfo size: 2 INFO:[17:29:16] Start AutoGrid... autogrid: autogrid4: Successful Completion. INFO:[17:29:32] End AutoGrid... Beginning AutoDock... autodock4: wrong number of values read in. Check grid map! The XP machine: <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> - exit code -1 (0xffffffff) </message> <stderr_txt> Failed to get VersionInfo size: 1812 INFO:[17:29:15] Start AutoGrid... autogrid: autogrid4: Successful Completion. INFO:[17:29:31] End AutoGrid... Beginning AutoDock... autodock4: wrong number of values read in. Check grid map! I hope that this info helps. ![]() |
||
|
widdershins
Veteran Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 30, 2007 Post Count: 674 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Though for the sake of completeness I should probably say that the other betas I have running at present seem (touch wood) to be proceeding normally.
Though I could do with getting a few more allocated to the linux platform so I can grab some more. ![]() |
||
|
jasm580
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 20, 2007 Post Count: 157 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have one linux maching and it picked up a few
----------------------------------------About 1/2 of the units I pick up seem to have this same error about 24 seconds after starting. The others have been moving right along. I have also pick up a make up unit already and it error out on mine (as as the orginal did). -Jasm
-Jasm
|
||
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1423 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
sigh havent found any of these
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have suspended again. As noted above, some are proceeding correctly, some are not. We are investigating.
|
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some of you have posted that they have had success on running work units. Could you please post a few that seem to be running fine so I can look at what the differences may be?
Thanks, Uplinger |
||
|
jasm580
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 20, 2007 Post Count: 157 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some of you have posted that they have had success on running work units. Could you please post a few that seem to be running fine so I can look at what the differences may be? Thanks, Uplinger These are running from the same maching that I reported the error above. They have all process at least 1 full minute. BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000564_ s1_ 0001_ 2 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000567_ s1_ 0000_ 2 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000567_ s1_ 0001_ 0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000443_ s1_ 0001_ 1 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000447_ s1_ 0000_ 1 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000442_ s1_ 0001_ 2 -Jasm
-Jasm
|
||
|
Steve WCG
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 4, 2009 Post Count: 216 Status: Offline |
these are the 8 my i7 are working on now ... completion percent rangs from 10% (20 minutes) to 45% (1hr, 12 min)
BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000099_ s1_ 0001_ 1-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:18:12 8/11/09 22:18:12 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000220_ s1_ 0000_ 0-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:24:54 8/11/09 22:24:54 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000212_ s1_ 0001_ 1-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:24:54 8/11/09 22:24:54 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000144_ s1_ 0001_ 1-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:21:32 8/11/09 22:21:32 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000245_ s1_ 0001_ 1-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:27:59 8/11/09 22:27:59 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000245_ s1_ 0000_ 2-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:27:59 8/11/09 22:27:59 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000337_ s1_ 0000_ 0-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:50:06 8/11/09 22:50:06 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000249_ s1_ 0000_ 0-- HAL9005 In Progress 8/7/09 22:29:50 8/11/09 22:29:50 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 |
||
|
gb077492
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Dec 24, 2004 Post Count: 96 Status: Offline |
BETA_ HFCC_ s1_ 00000317_ s1_ 0000_ 1-- seems to be running OK. It's been going for 35 minutes and is around 27% on my machine which is
BOINC client version 6.2.28 for windows_intelx86 log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 Running as a daemon Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz [EM64T Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6] Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx OS: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 "R2": Standard Server x64 Editon, Service Pack 2, (05.02.3790.00) Memory: 16.00 GB physical, 17.40 GB virtual Disk: 465.75 GB total, 314.18 GB free Preferences limit memory usage when active to 8191.35MB Preferences limit memory usage when idle to 8191.35MB Preferences limit disk usage to 74.51GB (2 other units bombed out on this machine) Good luck! |
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for all the work unit names that appear to be running fine. I will look into them in comparison to the other work units that errored out.
Reason for me asking this information. Work units that have been sent out but have not errored all show up as In progress in the database. I can't tell which ones haven't been started and which ones have been started and appear to be running well. So the possible good work units help me from having to wait until the work units complete and are sent back. Thank you again. -Uplinger |
||
|
|
![]() |