Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 13
Posts: 13   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2685 times and has 12 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: After "customizing", the agent is "idel" all the time

Hello FJ -

I understand that. But still, it's very unusual that after three weeks (and 12 results returned) the rating which had been consistently at either 114 or 126/127 - never dropped below 114! - measured against a comparison device, it suddenly drops so low...

Thanks...:)
[Dec 14, 2004 11:46:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: After "customizing", the agent is "idel" all the time

Right. But, the sudden drop can easily be from the agent running when your CPU is otherwise engaged - this time more so than previously. Of course it would happen in a step function.

Key question is whether the CPU assessment changes the next time you get a new WU. To test whether this is what's causing the change you would want the cpu to not be busy next time a new WU is started.
[Dec 15, 2004 2:11:41 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: After "customizing", the agent is "idel" all the time

Thanks, FJ :)

My CPU usage shouldn't have changed dramatically; I do run SETI, too - but I've been running it even before I installed this agent, so it shouldn't have made any difference
But I am sure you must be right.
I'll let you know.

PS. (anybody): So, am I to understand (implicitly) that all of the 5 devices that appear within my profile use the amount of RAM reserved for the original single device, 70 GB - and not 70 GB EACH?
[Dec 16, 2004 12:19:50 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 13   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread