| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 15
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I would like to clean out all the INACTIVE devices on my account. Of course I can't do that or anyone else for that matter because your device statistics wouldn't be nearly as inflated as they are now for example at 300,000. I bet only half of those 300,000 devices are actually active at any given time. I have said this before and will say it again. Your device statistics are deceiving and do NOT represent a true representation of computing power at any given time for WCG if you don't allow volunteers to delete any inactive devices they may have on their accounts.
----------------------------------------When you start putting your volunteers best interest first instead of your own and allow an option to clear out INACTIVE devices on volunteer accounts, perhaps I will rejoin the effort. In the meantime, I personally do not like the deceit this project practices in relation to it's device statistics and will keep my machines elsewhere. [Edit 5 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 5, 2006 7:49:02 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
*whistles*
This is a known issue, and we have been promised a fix in the next update, which will be a week or two away now. Device count isn't very helpful anyway, even if it only covers active devices. Many devices are working part time. Better by far to look at the numbers in context, and understand them fully. And chill! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
device statistics are deceiving and do NOT represent a true representation of computing power at any given time for WCG True but do you work for the sake that the website boasts its stats.We work for the cause it represents and this cause is as good as any cause can get. I think your decision to keep ur systems at work for something else cant be reversed by what we say but its good that they do not remain idle and waste cpu cycles. My best wishes for you REJ05. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The member and device counts on the stats page are registered members and registered devices. It's true that the active numbers are less but instead of deleting them, we are working on getting the inactive members back. We figure that a member joined for a reason and became inactive for a reason. If we can figure out some of the main reasons people go inactive, then we'll try to come up with something that will help people stay active.
As an example, we recently sent emails to all members who were inactive for more than 60 days. This effort had a large number of people come back. A lot of inactive members we surprised that they were inactive and thanked us for letting them know. Many of these said that they promptly rejoined. Many of the inactive members had technical issues which we helped them resolve. The support mail traffic has been very heavy in the last few weeks and we've handled hundreds of emails from members helping them get back on the grid. We now have a weekly mailing to inactive members. As soon as someone goes over 60 days, we send them an email. Later this week we'll be sending out a quarterly newsletter which will remind more people to rejoin as well. We're trying ... but thanks for making sure we stay honest. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
As an example, we recently sent emails to all members who were inactive for more than 60 days. This effort had a large number of people come back. . Is there anyway in which we could assist you in this mailing process or some thing?I want to help but dont know if i can.It sure would be nice to do some work and help you guys. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The mailing is easy and responding to the emails is behind the firewall so we have to handle it by ourselves. We'll give it some thought how members can help. Thanks for asking.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I don't know how others can help... but I know a way in which I can help. I am a PC Tech who runs a Computer Repair Shop at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. So anyone who has problems with their PC that ya'll can't fix, can be refered to me. I will be more than happy to help them fix their computers and help them rejoin WCG.
Let me know if that'll help. Lyos Gemini Norezel lyosnorezel@yahoo.com |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
i'm no computer tech, but the first thing i did to make this prog more palatable was to turn off the screen saver, which for some reason is installed and runs by default.
screen savers use a lot of resources, even if just waiting in the background for a chance to deploy. you might want to alert people to screen saver options, and probably not have it set itself up by default. no person i know would have a clue that you had done that or any more clues as to how to turn it off, and most of them would wig out if i even attempted to show them, through some kind of built in fear of technology. is there a psycological term for that yet ? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Technophobia?
It's not uncommon. However, you're wrong about screensavers. When not in use (when no screensaver is displayed) there is no screensaver program running at all. It uses precisely zero resources. When Windows detects inactivity (an easy thing to do, since it has to monitor the input devices anyway), it launches the screensaver program. This is where things vary: some screensavers are greedy with resources. For example, the 3D Windows screensavers will steal 100% cpu, despite really not needing it. The WCG screensaver is different; it is designed to use an absolute minimum of resources, to leave as much free for crunching as possible. I'm not happy with the default, either - but I think the most sensible thing would be to make it an installation option (like in the BOINC client installation). This puts the decision up front, and leaves the user in control. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Didactylos?
you can reduce the impact of the graphics in the Windows environment by setting your screen saver to none from Lewis Carroll Veteran Cruncher why would others say this ? Will the software run faster if I shut down the screen saver? Yes. The screen saver diverts your computer resources to motion and graphic processing. This is not just for the World Community Grid's screen saver, but for most screen savers. from the "Help" section "Screen Saver" |
||
|
|
|