Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3322
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Unixchick
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Apr 16, 2020 Post Count: 1001 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you Kevin and Mike for the update. I've almost got my 6 month badge (2 more weeks?) and it looks like I can get my year badge still.
Question: what puts a machine in the reliable category? and does aborting WUs affect that? I've had some WUs that were sent to me after a no response, but then the non responder responded and thus the WU was already valid and not worth me spending time crunching. I also got one of the extreme laggards (80) that was sent to 3. I was the first one to respond to that one, so no worries, as I keep my queue short, but I could see the thought of aborting if 2 have responded and it is valid already. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I just received 15 99s and they ALL were priority
|
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12440 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
But were they resends?
|
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 268 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mike,
I've also now had several 099s that are priority (and not resends). 099 appears to have become priority some time between 13:12 and 14:45 (UTC) on 29 October. Cheers, Mark |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
But were they resends? No, they were not resends. All were _0 and _1 |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12440 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks. Just checking. It was only 3 days since 098 became a priority generation.
Mike |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
i received a 082 this morning that is less then a hour from being completed
|
||
|
geophi
Advanced Cruncher U.S. Joined: Sep 3, 2007 Post Count: 108 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I received 2 priority 100s after 0300 UTC 01 Nov that were not resends.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by geophi at Nov 1, 2021 4:54:24 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I received a 108 work unit so does that change the time table of completion
|
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12440 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Robert
The timetable is based on the total number of units still to go. The leading generation that you have reported is ahead of its expected arrival, so indicative of an earlier end date. It also advances the generations considered as extreme laggards to 083 and earlier. Your 082 probably had 2 wingmen instead of 1. The 10-day average number of results returned has also risen from 19609.8 to 20014.4 (+2%) so shortening the forecast end date by 2% or 6 days.to 17 August 2022. Mike |
||
|
|
![]() |