Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 208
Posts: 208   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 45063 times and has 207 replies Next Thread
herflick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
Post Count: 176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

Another point to look at is that with 98% of project experiments complete in the (1379-1769) range that leaves 2% of work units to be crunched, which translates to 2,029,500 work units.

Over the last 10 days the project had crunched an average of 238,200 work units per day, which indicated it would take 8.5 days to crunch the remaining 2,029,500 work units. This would put the end of the experiment set at around December 19th. Let's watch and see what happens. Will the work unit well run dry at that time or new set of experiments flow ? Will be interesting to see.
[Dec 10, 2018 6:09:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mumak
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Dec 7, 2012
Post Count: 477
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

I think we will run out sooner, as this reflects units already returned to scientists.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 10, 2018 6:39:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Seoulpowergrid
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Apr 12, 2013
Post Count: 815
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

Looks like we might have already run out. I have this PC set to run 3 at a time and only have 1 running and it is a resend. Getting the "no tasks available" message.

Edit: Looks like I spoke too soon. I just got 2 more which means I am running 3 out of 3.
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Seoulpowergrid at Dec 11, 2018 1:18:08 AM]
[Dec 11, 2018 1:09:38 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
herflick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
Post Count: 176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

Just got a work unit with iteration 184 , that's the highest number I have ever seen to date . Does anyoneone know if the project is supposed to go to iteration 200 for each of the experimental units ?

FAH2_001324_avx101119-0-1_000006_000064_184
[Dec 11, 2018 2:14:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
craig4nr
Cruncher
USA
Joined: May 3, 2014
Post Count: 20
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

The target was originally 250, but they lowered it to 150 earlier this year because progress was moving more slowly than they had expected and I think they figured they could get all they needed at that point. This is why the percentage jumped abruptly a couple of months ago. It's also why the 50,000 step tasks ended earlier than anticipated. I think we will continue to get iterations of tasks past the target point until they decide to stop. I'm guessing they're waiting for all, or most tasks to get past iteration 150 before they do that.
[Dec 11, 2018 5:19:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
herflick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
Post Count: 176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

That makes sense, now that I went back to the 9/25/2018 post on this board from jcxia - FightAIDS@Home Scientist. The scientist wrote "We changed the original design of 2.5 million steps per replica to 1.5 so that we can finish the benchmark faster." So that would translate going down from 250 iterations to 150 iterations.
[Dec 11, 2018 10:13:49 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mumak
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Dec 7, 2012
Post Count: 477
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

Experiments 001319-001769
Complete: 100%
----------------------------------------

[Dec 17, 2018 8:07:38 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

Still getting non-resend units in that number range on a regular basis. I thought their number lagged the grid. Must be a rounding error...
[Dec 17, 2018 11:49:41 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
herflick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
Post Count: 176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

I'm still getting work units as well despite project website showing 100 % complete for experiments 1319-1769... anyone have any information on what is going on ??

Many of the units are below the iteration 150.
[Dec 19, 2018 4:00:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: project status website never fixed

Greetings,

We are still running workunits for those batches. We are also currently testing the new workunits that will be coming in the future. The batches in question being 100% complete happened because some of the children workunits made it further along in the simulations than other children. Say you wanted to get 100 children run, and some have run up to 120, but others are at 80. On average, you've done 100 children. Hope this helps clear up some of the confusion and we will let you know when we stop that current simulation.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Dec 20, 2018 4:28:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 208   Pages: 21   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread