| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 31
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Mumak
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 7, 2012 Post Count: 477 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Would the NUMA issue apply to a single processor system? Yes, it's not limited to the number of processor packages, but it depends on the number of CPU cores/threads. If there are more than 64 CPU threads, they will need to be divided into multiple CPU Groups (due to several factors including affinity mask, which is a 64-bit wide register). And if there are multiple groups, BOINC might have issues assigning proper group affinity to child processes (WUs). ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Mumak at Dec 3, 2015 3:55:57 PM] |
||
|
|
Mumak
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 7, 2012 Post Count: 477 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I am about to get a Knights Landing Xeon Phi from Intel. I would like to be able to help out in testing, if anyone is interested. I don't know anything about programming, I just crunch. Which one would you like to get ? I don't think it makes (crunching) sense to get the current x100 series (Knights Corner) and the self-boot Knights Landing wasn't released yet. I'd be certainly interested in testing the later one... ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The 72 core one
|
||
|
|
Mumak
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 7, 2012 Post Count: 477 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The self-boot option or Coprocessor card ?
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
coprocessor card Knights Landing
|
||
|
|
twilyth
Master Cruncher US Joined: Mar 30, 2007 Post Count: 2130 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Next iterations of the Phi are Knights Mill at 14nm and Knights Hill at 10nm. Not a lot of info yet but some here - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/17/intel_xeon_phi_knights_mill/
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Dayle Diamond
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 31, 2013 Post Count: 452 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Has anybody actually tried this and got it working?
|
||
|
|
KLiK
Master Cruncher Croatia Joined: Nov 13, 2006 Post Count: 3108 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Has anybody actually tried this and got it working? Only way this could work with WCG science is a "virtualization", which could take a lot of RAM also...but no, haven't tried it! too expensive for a TOY! ![]() |
||
|
|
Trotador
Senior Cruncher Joined: Mar 26, 2009 Post Count: 154 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
---------------------------------------- ![]() |
||
|
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1684 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
As soon as such a board (incl. CPU) will be affordable and will operate under Linux and support boinc/WCG, it could become a real and strong temptation !!!
----------------------------------------My concern is about the necessary network bandwidth for down- and upload purpose. |
||
|
|
|