| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 65
|
|
| Author |
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
It would be interesting to see how these numbers compare to other crunching machines... I checked 2 AMD G34 systems. For points I used the last 7 day average to figure a per day amount. Systems are both running Linux. Here are the results. Workstation 1: ~60,000 ppd 325 watts (multiplied by 24 for watt/hours) = 7.69 ppw/h (points per watt/hour) Workstation 2: ~150,000 ppd 620 watts (multiplied by 24 for watt/hours) = 10.0 ppw/h (points per watt/hour) Workstation 1 is currently having some sort of issue as it doesn't seem to be doing as much work as it's capable of. I've been working on finding out the cause. Here is a video showing these two system up close and personal. Happy new year! - Ryan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xzcWlb3-mo ![]() |
||
|
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7852 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ryan222,
----------------------------------------Those are some sweet machines. I know why you keep the Big Kahuna in the garage. I run a couple of Dell rack mount servers, so I know how much noise they can make. My two are out in the shed, where it is currently about -15F (Old Man Winter cooling). Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
hunter1978
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Apr 24, 2010 Post Count: 111 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Very cool Ryan ! Outstanding.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
They are some nice machines Ryan!
----------------------------------------Thanks for the comparison, workstation 1 compares to my 24 core machine for ppw, I'm just adding some more machines, however, I'm going to look closer at the output/power consumption before adding too many... All - other comparisons would be useful and appreciated...
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It would be interesting to see how these numbers compare to other crunching machines... I checked 2 AMD G34 systems. For points I used the last 7 day average to figure a per day amount. Systems are both running Linux. Here are the results. Workstation 1: ~60,000 ppd 325 watts (multiplied by 24 for watt/hours) = 7.69 ppw/h (points per watt/hour) Workstation 2: ~150,000 ppd 620 watts (multiplied by 24 for watt/hours) = 10.0 ppw/h (points per watt/hour) Workstation 1 is currently having some sort of issue as it doesn't seem to be doing as much work as it's capable of. I've been working on finding out the cause. Here is a video showing these two system up close and personal. Happy new year! - Ryan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xzcWlb3-mo Cool video. My dual X5670's @2.93 are doing around 77000 ppd. My i4930k @3.9 is doing around 60000. Waiting on intel to release the 8 core haswell around summer time.
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
![]() |
||
|
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
It would be interesting to see how these numbers compare to other crunching machines... I checked 2 AMD G34 systems. For points I used the last 7 day average to figure a per day amount. Systems are both running Linux. Here are the results. Workstation 1: ~60,000 ppd 325 watts (multiplied by 24 for watt/hours) = 7.69 ppw/h (points per watt/hour) Workstation 2: ~150,000 ppd 620 watts (multiplied by 24 for watt/hours) = 10.0 ppw/h (points per watt/hour) Workstation 1 is currently having some sort of issue as it doesn't seem to be doing as much work as it's capable of. I've been working on finding out the cause. Here is a video showing these two system up close and personal. Happy new year! - Ryan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xzcWlb3-mo Cool video. My dual X5670's @2.93 are doing around 77000 ppd. My i4930k @3.9 is doing around 60000. Waiting on intel to release the 8 core haswell around summer time.
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
I remember Bearcat posting power consumption figures for that machine before somewhere...can't remember the number.
----------------------------------------The 4930k system is probably the most efficient though, probably only using about 200 watts for the entire system. Generally speaking, the most efficient systems are going to be the ones that have the most non-overclocked cores and have the least amount of extra devices (graphics cards/hard disks/etc.) ![]() |
||
|
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks Rayn, I'll have a search for it.
----------------------------------------Inspired by your Big Kahuna system, I'm planning my next addition! I'll post more info as things develop, but it's going to be BIG!
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Mamajuanauk at Jan 2, 2014 8:41:13 PM] |
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Just looked at my UPS's, the dually is at 260 out with no GPU installed and the hex is at 175 out. The hex is OC to 3.9Ghz and has a 7950 GPU in it. Monitors were off though when I looked. Also, the dually has 4 hard drives and an ssd whereas the hex has 1 ssd and 1 hard drive.
----------------------------------------
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by Bearcat at Jan 2, 2014 11:09:21 PM] |
||
|
|
Mamajuanauk
Master Cruncher United Kingdom Joined: Dec 15, 2012 Post Count: 1900 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks Bearcat, those numbers work out to the following, if I've got it right:
----------------------------------------=sum((77000/24)/260) = 12.34 ppw/h In a word, impressive! I can't help wondering how high it would go if you disconnected all the non-essential components to reduce power to the minimum…
Mamajuanauk is the Name! Crunching is the Game!
![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
|