Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Help Conquer Cancer Thread: Really upset with HCC |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 61
|
Author |
|
ericinboston
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 12, 2010 Post Count: 243 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
As an extremely active member of HCC, it's time for me to vent.
----------------------------------------After years of working on HCC, it seems HCC is shutting down. While I am happy that HCC seemed to have reached their mission, HCC didn't even have the common decency to send out an email 30-60 days prior stating so...or stating in LAYMEN'S terms, how the HCC worked, what's next, and when. Instead, I wake up to find numerous machines with nothing to do and entries in the Messages area of BOINC that there are no more work units. After visiting the HCC News area of the website, I'm littered with garbledy gook phrases and sentences that only people with a PhD in Biology can understand. I'm also told that "at a later date" a new project will come about to continue to find a cure. When the heck is "at a later date"?! 2014? 2018?! Seriously! I'm mad. Really mad! Why do projects like HCC treat their volunteers this way?! They (such as Christina in another thread) post very quick and bland messages every few months on the forum, give us laymen-folk 0 information on the progress, and then just shut down after receiving millions of dollars' worth of computing power. It adds up to nothing more than a "Thanks! Cya!" I want to find a cure for cancer. But the way HCC handled their shutdown/next wave of research is exactly the biggest reason why WCG only has a few hundred thousand active computers after almost 10 years of existence. Think about it...850 million users on Facebook in only a few years, yet WCG can't even get .01% of Facebook's volume...and I would argue that EVERYONE wants to find a cure for cancer. So now what do I do in my quest to solve cancer? WCG offers only an intermittent project. Any of you know of cancer projects elsewhere? [Edit 1 times, last edit by ericinboston at May 7, 2013 12:22:19 PM] |
||
|
ryan222h
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2006 Post Count: 425 Status: Offline |
Cool down, Eric. Its volunteerism...thou shall not expect anything in return. Just be happy that you made a difference, one that helped finish the project as quickly as it did.
----------------------------------------Once the data are analyzed there will be findings to look at with the results of our contributions. It doesn't happen overnight. [Edit 1 times, last edit by ryan222h at May 7, 2013 1:13:09 PM] |
||
|
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 1343 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
ericinboston, I agree that it is very irritating when a project isn't consistent in its traditional patterns and thus catching you by surprise. I agree that there should have been the normal 30 day announcement to give you the heads up. However, I would like to take a moment to chastise back. For someone so dedicated to the fight of cancer within WCG it makes me wonder why you don't check in on the project more often. You can certainly go back to many posts about its ending. There was no lack of discussion within the forums. Doing so would have given you the advanced warning you crave.
----------------------------------------To address your last question, you could always help GPUGrid or one of the protein or genome projects. I'm sure they have their feet in the cancer waters as well. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
In amongst, Thé Dashboard was off by about one week when the announcement of about 25 days remaining was made, a surprise [it was so close ;-].
|
||
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2977 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Hi Eric, according to a forum search against your name, your last post (prior to the one I'm responding to), was on the 13th of September 2012. Obviously, I don't know as to how often you "looked in but didn't post" during that time, although there have been numerous threads started with the premise of "the end is nigh". Indeed, I even think both the project scientists and the WCG techs were astonished as to how big an influence GPU crunching had on this project. This was further tracked, by the statistics SekeRob (a Community Advisor, here at WCG), produces on a regular basis - illustrating as to the remarkable effect GPU crunching was making on reducing the expected length of this particular project.
----------------------------------------Thus, instead of "chastising" the project scientists/WCG for not personally keeping you informed, be thankful that they've been inundated with all these completed results - which, hopefully, will go someway to finding a cure for this dreadful disease. As to getting a "layman's explanation" of what the HCC project was attempting to do, again, there were numerous opportunities where you could post questions on the forums (especially in the threads where the scientists were providing their regular updates), as well as the webcasts which they made. Did you fully utilise these options? |
||
|
ericinboston
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jan 12, 2010 Post Count: 243 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Hi Eric, according to a forum search against your name, your last post (prior to the one I'm responding to), was on the 13th of September 2012. Obviously, I don't know as to how often you "looked in but didn't post" during that time, although there have been numerous threads started with the premise of "the end is nigh". @ Coleslaw and gb009761...I'm not yelling but I will state my points: 1)I should not have to come to forums/discussion groups all the time and sift through raw text postings to find updates. HCC should have been leveraging email every Quarter or so. I don't come to these forums a lot, because, well, there's really not much of a point for me...again, I shouldn't be the one checking up on the Project every few weeks. They should be pushing the News to me. Also, ever try reading this Forum on an iPhone? 2)Specifically, yes, there have been numerous threads about the end being near, yet no email notification. Thanks HCC. 3)The HCC Project has made no attempt to get me excited about the next project...I have no idea what it is/will be called, no idea when it will be available, no clue other than "at a later date" sometime will pop up. So I'm supposed to hang around and wait to be loyal to HCC's team while they take their time figuring out whatever they want to do. They can't even point me/us to other Projects to work on while they contemplate what's next. Again, thanks a lot, HCC. 4)When I received email alerts about HCC webinars (think I got 2 in the past few years), I attended. Nice to attend, but again, not for the laymen. We're all here to help, and I feel like we're just being used like a rental truck. I don't think it's intentional...but at the end of the day, the feelings exist. HCC needs some basic Project Management...find a single person that will: 1)Give Quarterly Project updates (they relatively do this) or more often depending on goals and accomplishments. 2)Give the updates in laymen terms as well as mumbo jumbo 3)Utilize email alerts or other "push" technology rather than relying on me to sift through textual forums. I've been using forums since the BBS days of the early 80's...why am I doing so now in 2013?...or even 2002? 4)When the Project ends, let's have a thoroughly documented Project Results in both laymen terms and mumbo jumbo...what did it accomplish? what were the goals? how did the Project perform? where did it fail? where did it succeed? what's next? when? how can we retain our volunteers for the next round? are they going to email us every month or so to let us know how soon the next project is coming? etc. Again...I'm really bummed the Project ended this way. My anger is from the love of this project. I'm not upset with the scientists or individual members of the HCC Project...I'm upset at how the Project communicates to its loyal volunteers. I've worked in the medical field for a non-profit...and their Projects always had a Project Manager whose duties were to give the timely, related updates I speak of. The PM was never a scientist. [Edit 2 times, last edit by ericinboston at May 7, 2013 2:15:34 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Whatever methodology WCG chooses to convey nearing project ends, they did, the scientists on April 11 released a project update http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~juris/WCG/UPDATE-APR2013.pdf which was transmitted to all clients' 'Notices' tabs that had talked to WCG. Before that, there was some anticipation of more work coming out the nooks and crannies, but as it is with the nuthouse sequestration in the USA, much science funding is drying up, meaning choices of what to continue researching is forced into fast-track decisionmaking. Maybe complain to your congress(wo)men representatives responsible for.... Boston.
|
||
|
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 1343 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Well, lets address what you are asking.
----------------------------------------1)Give Quarterly Project updates (they relatively do this) or more often depending on goals and accomplishments. Very few projects actually do this at any of the BOINC projects let alone here at WCG. So, this is a common problem. When I say problem I mean complaint by the volunteers. The scientists still get what they came for. 2)Give the updates in laymen terms as well as mumbo jumbo So how dumbed down does it need to be to qualify as laymen terms? Very few really care how cancer is cured just as long as it is cured or at least better treated. Is this really worth wasting the scientists time when they should be working on the cure? I personally agree that it doesn't take that much time to post a little blurb, but others (especially in these forums) think more theoretical. And that theoretical 10 minutes spent blurbing (yes I made that up) might save a life. 3)Utilize email alerts or other "push" technology rather than relying on me to sift through textual forums. I've been using forums since the BBS days of the early 80's...why am I doing so now in 2013?...or even 2002? This is a lot more simple to answer. Because most societies have become lazy and need it thrown in their lap doesn't mean that what worked in 2002 doesn't still do the job just fine. You want an email, that is sooooo 1996. I will take 2002 instead. You don't like sifting through many posts....you could have gotten the general idea just reading the thread titles. That was a pretty good indicator. I for one don't want spammed for every little change or update. I just want major issues like server down time or maybe an announcement like they found the cure for cancer. The forums do quite well at breaking the rest down. And, they already push some of the announcements within the newer BOINC manager news feeds. 4)When the Project ends, let's have a thoroughly documented Project Results in both laymen terms and mumbo jumbo...what did it accomplish? what were the goals? how did the Project perform? where did it fail? where did it succeed? what's next? when? how can we retain our volunteers for the next round? are they going to email us every month or so to let us know how soon the next project is coming? etc. This one is not realistic at this time frame. Think about it. What did it accomplish? That could take decades to sort out and associate with this project. What was it trying to accomplish is already outlined in the project description. More details in the forums, but yes you would have to sift through way too much at this point to get all of it. Just look through the forums of finished projects to get an idea of how well details get reported back. You may never hear of the results. That just comes with the distributive computing environment. I agree that it would be nice to hear more details. Unfortunately that is one of the shortcomings you have to expect in the DC world. |
||
|
astrolabe.
Senior Cruncher Joined: May 9, 2011 Post Count: 496 Status: Offline |
WOW. We finished a project and you are mad the project is finished? The point of WCG's existence is to finish a project.
So you wanted more notice of the end. To do what? Help finish the project? If you had had DAILY notices of the end, the project would still have ended on the day it actually ended. That is the point of ending. To end; complete; finish; terminate; wrap up. So your machines went dry. WOW. Accept some of the responsibility. I am sorry you are having a bad day, just no need to wale on the WCG Admins, Techs, CAs and members. None of these people did anything to you. |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7545 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Give the updates in laymen terms as well as mumbo jumbo I don't really understand all the "mumbo jumbo" either, but what I can do is (if I am really interested) is do some research - Wikipedia is pretty good - or go find someone who does understand what is being disseminated and ask them to explain it to me. I understand way more about this stuff now than when I started. Cancer research is a complex issue. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|