Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: Drug Search for Leishmaniasis Forum Thread: Current status of the Drug Search for Leishmaniasis project |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 51
|
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
When we initially launched the project in September 2011 on World Community Grid, we planned on using Autodock-Vina to evaluate the docking of 5,353 protein structures from the Leishmania parasite against 600,000 chemical compounds selected and filtered from the ZINC database. The software measures the protein-compound interaction in a three dimensional space and generates a score according to the degree of affinity. The 5,353 protein structures correspond to 53 Leishmania proteins for which the crystal structures were obtained from x-ray crystallography information found in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) along with 100 alternate modeled protein structures for each of the 53 original structures. However, the rate of progress showed that it would take 20-25 years to compute all of these interactions. Therefore we prioritized the 5,353 structures and focused on just 530 modeled structures along with the 53 original PDB structures for a total of 583 structures. This would give us useful results much sooner.
The table loaded in the news section at PECET website summarizes the status of the DSFL project. Each of the cells on the table corresponds to any of the 5,353 structures, both original and modeled. The green cells correspond to the 53 original structures from PDB (bottom horizontal row) and 75 modeled structures of the first PDB protein (first column) already docked before prioritizing the 530 structures. The blue cells correspond to the 530 modeled and prioritized structures that have been already docked against the 600,000 compounds. And finally, the red cells correspond to those 530 priority structures pending to be processed. We give a very big “thank you” to the World Community Grid members for contributing to this project! |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7578 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Thanks for the update and the link to the site.
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks for the diagram on your web site, Dr Muskus. Crunchers are always asking about project progress and this is a really great way to show us.
Now let's keep hoping that something really good comes out of all of this... |
||
|
yojimbo197
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 30, 2012 Post Count: 83 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Dear Dr. Muskus,
----------------------------------------If you had some programmers design screening projects that used both the CPU and GPU or GPU's, you could significantly cut the processing time for all the potential binding/docking combinations. Right now WCG members are crunching through the Help Conquer Cancer CPU+GPU WCG projects at a pace that will exhaust all projects within a few months. [Edit 1 times, last edit by yojimbo197 at Oct 31, 2012 8:33:28 AM] |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7578 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
I just got to thinking about the numbers of workunits involved here and how fast they are being processed. The project shows 27,253,226 results done at this point. 583 total protein structures/models run against 600,000 ZINC chemical compounds would give 349,800,000 work units. That leaves 322,546,774 workunits left to go. Yesterday we processed 89,767. At that rate it would take another 3593 days or about 9.84 years. This still seems like an awfully long time. Am I not looking at this correctly ?
----------------------------------------We need more power!!!!!!!!! Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
@yojimbo197:
at a pace that will exhaust all projects within a few months. Won't happen as long as HPF2 and FAAH are still getting crunched at WCG. |
||
|
yojimbo197
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jun 30, 2012 Post Count: 83 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Hey Moonian,
----------------------------------------You should reread the ENTIRE sentence. Here I will post it for you to save you the effort of scrolling up: "Right now WCG members are crunching through the Help Conquer Cancer CPU+GPU WCG projects at a pace that will exhaust all projects within a few months." Since the subject of that particular sentence was Help Conquer Cancer CPU+GPU projects, I didn't feel the urge to repeat myself in the same sentence. **Edited**TKH [Edit 2 times, last edit by TKH at Oct 31, 2012 12:57:04 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sgt.Joe, my bit counter makes it 132 blue boxes, when 530 are needed {The bottom+left green row/column to be subtracted from what is required under the new model pick rational}. If you add green to the blue boxes, we've really done about 250 models = 27 million results] in about 13 months. Does make it look like less than 2 years to go.
|
||
|
pramo
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 14, 2005 Post Count: 703 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Hey Moonian, You should reread the ENTIRE sentence. Here I will post it for you to save you the effort of scrolling up: "Right now WCG members are crunching through the Help Conquer Cancer CPU+GPU WCG projects at a pace that will exhaust all projects within a few months." Since the subject of that particular sentence was Help Conquer Cancer CPU+GPU projects, I didn't feel the urge to repeat myself in the same sentence. **Edited** TKH. Wow. I'll just leave this here for yojimbo197 without further comment. "Right now WCG members are crunching through the Help Conquer Cancer CPU+GPU "all projects" here at WCG, no? http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/stat/viewProjects.do [Edit 3 times, last edit by TKH at Oct 31, 2012 12:58:47 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The repeated sentence is technically incorrect. The "will"word could do with replacement by the "would" word, to convey it's intend and make it for the non-native English speakers unambiguous.
My old college book "English Comprehensive" I'm still holding, 45 years after moving up... Not in print, a classic reference to me, still, and not written by a native English speaker at that ;). But, slighting a member, who's not native English speaking at that, I'd consider... how's the English good form expression... "Not done". Now, forum policy can be summed up in two words: "maintain decorum". In the verbal sense, to add this was OFF TOPIC. The thread is about DSFL progress, which with the applied rational will be completing within reasonable time [regrettably not suitable to port to GPU as most complex WCG sciences are not, and if, extremely difficult]. Thank you. |
||
|
|