Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 254
|
![]() |
Author |
|
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 748 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmmm -- strange result? On my returned result for cfsw_ 0130_ 00130546_ 2-- , I got a "Valid" and the other two got "Invalid". Is my PC BETTER than the other ones?
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by littlepeaks at Apr 22, 2012 6:12:34 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Took cfsw off my amd rigs. Couple invalids compared to none on my intel.
|
||
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The validator is on again and turned 8 more workunits invalid (on 4 different hosts) ![]() I didn't got any invalid wu until the issue posted on Apr 21, 2012 3:39:07 PM. I only had 2 now I have 2 pages of invalids and 5 pages of inconclusives. What's going on with this project. Thinking of heading up and moving out. Don't see much sense in wasting valuable resources until things get fixed.
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
didn't have any until the last hung validater was placed back on line then got 2 pages worth. none since then
|
||
|
Jason1478963
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Sep 18, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The validator is on again and turned 8 more workunits invalid (on 4 different hosts) ![]() I didn't got any invalid wu until the issue posted on Apr 21, 2012 3:39:07 PM. I only had 2 now I have 2 pages of invalids and 5 pages of inconclusives. What's going on with this project. Thinking of heading up and moving out. Don't see much sense in wasting valuable resources until things get fixed. With 7 pages of invalids, and 11 pages of inconclusives, I'm thinking the same ![]() The credit seems way off too, claiming almost the same credit for a 2.5 hour runtime wu as a 10 hr. runtime wu, and getting it too! (2.54 hrs runtime wu claimed/granted 87.2 / 88.8 vs. 9.96 hrs. runtime - claimed/granted 88.4 / 88.4). ?????? ![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Jason1478963 at Apr 23, 2012 2:19:12 AM] |
||
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree with all the posts. I cut this project off this morning as I have wasted enough resources making invalids. Currenly looking for binary pulsars. Have not found any of them either but at least the wu's are valid.
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ok,
----------------------------------------I'm moved to a new house, managed to get 3 comps up and running, (one of them sitting on the bar fridge and the monitor and keyboard on some ice chests, until I get my desks in the basement). But if this doesn't sort out by tom night, I'll have to head to greener pastures. One page of inconclusives (on my I7 2600K) is enuf... ![]() |
||
|
Hypernova
Master Cruncher Audaces Fortuna Juvat ! Vaud - Switzerland Joined: Dec 16, 2008 Post Count: 1908 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ok, I'm moved to a new house, managed to get 3 comps up and running, (one of them sitting on the bar fridge and the monitor and keyboard on some ice chests, until I get my desks in the basement). But if this doesn't sort out by tom night, I'll have to head to greener pastures. One page of inconclusives (on my I7 2600K) is enuf... Inconclusive is very often a transitory situation before they get validated. Do not be worried if you have lots of them. Check how many of them change status over time. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Inconclusive is very often a transitory situation before they get validated. Do not be worried if you have lots of them. Check how many of them change status over time. All three repair jobs I got after the validator problems turned invalid. As a result my computer became unreliable and all single redundancy WUs I returned afterwards turned inconclusive. All of those inconclusives turned invalid as soon as the second task was returned. Because of the new unreliability I received no further WUs with single redundancy, so there were no more inconclusives as well. And without single redundancy the validation seemed to work better - there were no more invalids. Don't know what would happen if the machine became reliable again because I deselected the project... |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
mweisensee, I'm building my own set of data from all the repair jobs I'm getting... lots. It makes no rhyme or reason which way the validated result falls [mine / yours / others getting the valid mark], suggesting that different CPU/OS families maybe produce enough a different result that quorums do not seem to be ''close enough'' to validate both or all 3, even seen it needing 4. To summarize: Is there another homogeneity issue e.g. between Intel xxx and AMD yyy etc? Techs can only solve, as when the requested addition of CPU/OS info to be added to the Result logs, do not allow us to self diagnose accurately or draw fact based conclusions. For the moment only had 1 inconclusive that started the run as initial distro one, else it's always been make up jobs I've had, but not too many where the outcome makes no sense [logs of all quorum members though matching and clean].
----------------------------------------Fortunately, unless one went the exclusive route [anyone's own business if they want to], standard procedure has been followed to weight the distribution low at the start of this science so that multi-project crunchers do not get many in the mix. The experienced by now should know that it's folly to jump all cores on a new science release. Beta just will *not* bring out all the bugs. The *active* participating population is too small for that (those that beta and try to break the app, rather for the sake of clocking up badge hours). --//-- P.S. No I have no 79 cores idling on Linux as I read in multiple places... I booted the one Linux host over to Windows ;P [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Apr 23, 2012 10:21:58 AM] |
||
|
|
![]() |