| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Round 3 - GPU Beta Test for Help Conquer Cancer |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 151
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Man. That message: Tasks are commited to other platforms is driving me off the wall.
---------------------------------------- I want more BETAS..... Crunching on.... [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 20, 2012 12:23:56 AM] |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
The GPU beta WUs use 100% of a CPU on Nvidia cards. I think it has something to do with the drivers. My ATI card only uses 36%.  They both use 95-97% of the GPU on my cards. @Dataman. Freeing 1 CPU core should do it. Worked for me on i7-2600k with a GTX 460. The other 7 cores are running non-stop @ 99.7%. Me too. I freeded one thread and aborted the CPU job running with the GPU and they all are playing together nicely in the sand box.  Funny though Only DM02 (twin GTX 260's) and DM07 (twin GTX 460's) are getting work and both are queuing 6-7 jobs at 0.01 cashe. The other 6 machines also with 260's, 460's and a lone 285 have received nothing and have refused attemps to force them to do so.  |
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Just got a few GPU WUs for the first time since last week!
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Round 4 seems to be already finished up...No more coming...
----------------------------------------BOINC client version 6.10.58 for windows_x86_64 Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz [Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5] (Running with 1 core free) OS: Microsoft Windows 7: x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) Memory: 12.00 GB physical (1600 MHz), 24.00 GB virtual NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti [448] (driver version 28566, CUDA version 4010, compute capability 2.0, 1280MB, 1428 GFLOPS peak) Temps and Watts still look very good. Same as Round 2. Average "Elapsed time" 3 min. 47 sec. I did notice the last few I got were _2 and _3 so I assume this GPU is considered reliable  There is one thing I think might need to be addressed... The "Duration Correction Factor" for this machine started out as 0.9180 and got as high as 4.1413 and ended up 2.3657 That caused the "To completion" estimate for the c4cw CPU jobs to fluctuate wildly from 2 hours to over 9 hours. I run a 0.00 Additional work buffer , but I can imagine for those who run with a larger buffer to have some issues. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 20, 2012 1:13:10 AM] |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I'm thinking this batch is done. I'm only getting a resend here and there.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
  |
||
|
|
armstrdj
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Oct 21, 2004 Post Count: 695 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Any plans for checkpointing in GPU processing? To get longer running workunits we plan on packaging multiple images in a single workunit. For those there will be checkpoints taken in between images but at this point we have no plans on checkpointing the GPU applicaiton during an image. Thanks, armstrdj |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I run a 0.00 Additional work buffer , but I can imagine for those who run with a larger buffer to have some issues. I run with 0.01 and this is the first time I've seen BETA wu's waiting to run. Usually I complete one and get a new one. Not complaining though.  |
||
|
|
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher Classified Joined: Aug 29, 2008 Post Count: 2998 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I run a 0.00 Additional work buffer , but I can imagine for those who run with a larger buffer to have some issues. I run with 0.01 and this is the first time I've seen BETA wu's waiting to run. Usually I complete one and get a new one. Not complaining though. I run with a .02 buffer. This run was a steady 3 in cache with 1 running. As soon as 1 task finished another would download. Hats off to the techs on how smooth this beta test ran. (for moi anyway )
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I had some Betas waiting to run also with 0.00
But I was thinking of the buffer for the CPU jobs  |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Did 12 and all are pending. A number of my wingmen got this error:
----------------------------------------Result Log Result Name: BETA_ X0900060941373200511301450_ 0-- <core_client_version>6.10.60</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> ������� ������������� (0xe7) - exit code 231 (0xe7) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> Anyone want to bid hearts? |
||
|
|
|