| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 76
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
You're right, but I was expecting everything to upload, not just the scientific results, but after the brief deferral, the workunit indeed went.
|
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
OK.
----------------------------------------In this Distributed Computing activity "uploading" is used only for those scientific result files. Reporting completed WUs, requesting new ones etc... is done via a scheduler request which is practically the client sending its client_state control file and receiving it back updated by the scheduler server. Only one exchange of a single file, and with a different server than the data server. If that may help make things more clear. ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Have closed state of this thread with confirming that most work with quorum has been passed through the validators.
Till next time... crunching on. --//-- |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
confirming that most work with quorum has been passed through the validators. Euh, not really... but there is still one hour to go before the midday stats. ![]() Edit: Everything validated now. ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by JmBoullier at Jan 14, 2012 11:51:41 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
every one of mine has been returned but every one of em are pending validation....
----------------------------------------all vallidated now [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 14, 2012 11:32:39 AM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The planned outage: signed, sealed, and delivered by WCG. Well planned, well executed, well delivered, and finally -- well received. Next stop: GPU Beta!
; |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
On performance improvement with MySQL 5.5, looked in late last night and noticed that the My Grid > Stats History part was already update at 00:14 AM and the My Grid > Project detail section at 00:29 AM (before the lock out). Just now saw that the My Grid > Stats History was updated with noon data at 12:11 and Project Detail at 12:25... for the new stats hungry
----------------------------------------![]() --//-- edit: The catchup from the outage did not show up on Saturday, rather just now with an estimated 50 years extra for a Sunday morning in January 2012. 228:267:05:26:55 252,423,545 471,705 [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 15, 2012 12:52:43 PM] |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The performance of the database has been very nice. In fact it has exceeded my expectations. There are a number of things that were running so much faster that I've been going through log files to make sure that they are actually running correctly. This is definitely going to allow us to handle considerably more load.
|
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
We will see the effect from the outage over the next few days. If you look at the chart below, this is the # of results returned by hour over the last 24 hours (1 means it was returned 1 hour ago). It looks like most computers were deferred for 24 hours (mine were - I forgot to increase the buffer on mine!) and you can see when they started to communicate with our servers again:
+----------+--------------------------------------------------+ |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Wish the client had an internal override function to basically say: I've got an idle core... please go try anyhow.
----------------------------------------Various mechanisms have been discussed in this thread [an "how to" included on setting the client to autonomously resume after the expected outage] and some suggestions such as the WCG server bouncing any client that connects hours prior to the outage. Just thinking, a redirect mechanism that steps in to bounce clients for a preset amount of time. Both the Known Issues and this sister thread are demonstrating the low reach. For such rare longer scheduled outs, I'd personally not hesitate to have pushed it into the RSS feed that connects into the 6.12 and higher clients, even a mail to those that have had results returned in the past 7 days. Whilst, the effective loss of contributed time seems to have stayed well in bounds. Think by tonight's stats we can more firmly assess what it worked out at. Of course, those had a backup project defined [I have 2] would have kicked in would things have lasted way beyond scheduled times. Of course with that "better than you hoped for" performance hike, pretty please, whilst the capacity is not yet consumed by growth, size down tasks for some of the sciences such as FAAH and HPF2 that now sit in the 10 hour mean bracket. Their UL/DL bandwidth is small, i.e. would not cost WCG an arm and a leg to do. Whilst I write this, would not be surprised if you had that already in the planner. cheers and many thanks for achieving this step so smoothly [from our outside perspective] --//-- [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 15, 2012 3:25:35 PM] |
||
|
|
|