Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 47
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well, any 60 days advises will be a lot helpful. I support 100% this suggestion .
For any small cruncher, sound be a great help to change ours limited resources to crunch a different mix of projects, at least pay attention on some important project before it end. Many crunchers don't have time to dedicate to follow the news in the foruns, and for sure lost many important notices about the projects. In this aspect. an advise from WCG team 60 days before the end of any project, even if based on estimatives that could change, will increase the chance for many crunchers be aware about what will happens and take decisons based on this information. It will help us too, with more apropriated time period, to decides contribute more significantly (due our small scale of course) before the projects final, and to participate more in this projects that probably we contributed less than we would like due some reason. |
||
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The earlier the notice the better, so long as it is accurate. The best time to tell people would be just as soon as the decision is made that when the scheduled work is complete no more work will be created.
Projects move to the Intermittent Project category when scheduled work completes, rather than into the Completed Projects category. So some of us know there could be new tasks in several months or even years for any of the intermittent projects. I would also like to see a basic status page that simply lists the active projects, end dates if and when known, and any current problems. A quick reference page, the same as other projects use. If you stop picking up tasks or they all fail it would be useful to have a known place to go where you can simply check the status of all the projects. For newcomers, this would better facilitate the decision of which projects they want to crunch for. PS. It could also be important for some non-badge hunters; who wants to select to crunch for a project only to find out the hard way, a week later, when you stop getting tasks that it's no longer up and running. If your child had cancer, that would be the project you crunched for. You would not have received any email about the project coming to an end because you would not have been an active cruncher then and probably didn't read a 3week old announcement. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks skgiven, appreciated your message.
Unfortunatelly I'm a small cruncher, just a humble guy with limited resources. But do my best when possible to colaborate with specific projects, and from times to times I need jump out of WCG (due work reason), and my machine don't stay on in this periods. Back just today after long time out. Hope help a little bit more. |
||
|
DJALMAB
Cruncher Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 8 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I support this idea.
I have small resources to colaborate in WCG, but almost all are dedicated to process projects in general. In my opinion this suggestion will be helpful for little colaborators, and for big ones too. |
||
|
Coleslaw
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 1343 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't see the relevance of the 60 day mark. If you don't check in within 30 days, then that is a cruncher priority to not really care that much. 30 days can still give a cruncher at least a bronze if they jump in on that announcement day or 14 days before completion. That isn't counting the resends/repair work units. So, if you have a goal in mind and you didn't just join within that 30 day period, it takes little effort from badge hunters and non-badge hunters to take a quick peak in the forums to see what is going on. I agree with Astrolab on this one. Those truly seeking badges put in the leg work to inform themselves and they typically ask (sometimes aggressively) on estimated completion times in each near ending project forums.
----------------------------------------Edit: skgiven if your child died or is ill from cancer and that is why you are crunching that project...one would think that same cruncher would look in the forums for updates because it would be of interest to them. I would think this more so from this example then any other. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by Coleslaw at Apr 14, 2011 9:07:39 PM] |
||
|
Peao de Obra
Senior Cruncher Brazil Joined: Nov 23, 2010 Post Count: 196 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, any 60 days advises will be a lot helpful. I support 100% this suggestion . For any small cruncher, sound be a great help to change ours limited resources to crunch a different mix of projects, at least pay attention on some important project before it end. Many crunchers don't have time to dedicate to follow the news in the foruns, and for sure lost many important notices about the projects. In this aspect. an advise from WCG team 60 days before the end of any project, even if based on estimatives that could change, will increase the chance for many crunchers be aware about what will happens and take decisons based on this information. It will help us too, with more apropriated time period, to decides contribute more significantly (due our small scale of course) before the projects final, and to participate more in this projects that probably we contributed less than we would like due some reason. +1 ![]() |
||
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
I appreciate all inputs until now, but just to keep in focus the main point about the suggestion, I would like to return the ball for WCG...
----------------------------------------Wonder if anyone from tech team could informe us if this idea is feasible to be considered and implemented, or not, soon or later. Once is just a message to be posted in the forums, I guess that is possible, but I don't know if tech team have affordability and availability to take this action. Maybe, one way to be considered is put the 60 days advises in place of the 30 days advises, and in this way don't add more work to tech team but just antecipate the action to advise the WCG community about the final of projects... think about it please. ![]() Thank you very much for all that share coments and thougths until now, and colaborate with the construtive discussion. ![]() ![]() Best regards. ![]()
Cheers ! GIB@
![]() ![]() Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
RoBerTo ITaPoliS
Advanced Cruncher Brazil Joined: Dec 2, 2006 Post Count: 77 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree, it would be a great idea.
![]() |
||
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1423 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree the 60 day notice would be nice
----------------------------------------yes it is true it will mostly concern badge hunters but to be honest one of the reasons alot of people here crunch a higher percentage of there BOINC time on here is cause of the badges... I would assume it should not be too much more dificult to predict again with myself i hate crunching to the wire and try to predict when a project may be ending so i can determin what final badge I want for that project on HFCC I pushed my limit to make the 2 year point and would have been disappointed if i was short by a week or 2... on DDDT1 I was not watching the posts so i am about 1/2 way between badges. with how DDDT2 is running unless it becomes a solid runner i will probably stop at ruby. these are some of the choices i make when I donate my time to WCG. to be honest if there were no badges i would probably only be doing about a 25% share on WCG with Boinc but since there are badges i am normaly at a 95%+ share. also when trying to intrest a person in WCG if i need to know what there desires are and if i spend hours (in 5-10 min incriments) to get a person to crunch for WCG cause of project that is importnat for them and then at 40 days later the project ends I will probably loose that person cause i have not had the other chance to re-enfoce the idea that WCG projects all help. (this happend with the Influenza project when it starts phase 2 i have a chance to get someone back into the project) @Skgiven I believe they have reasons they do not post end dates planned for projects and it is probaly similar reasons to why they do not tell us what a project is prior to it launching. but yes i would love to see an estimated end date of all projects when posible. ![]() |
||
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Coleslaw, I think such crunchers would be preoccupied with more important things than thread browsing.
nasher, they could just have an amendable protocol, rather than reasons. Whatever, +1 if that counts for anything around here? |
||
|
|
![]() |