Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 72
Posts: 72   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 6328 times and has 71 replies Next Thread
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Post Count: 839
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Sekerob, I don't think the betas had any effect on the points for the regular linux WUs or even the beta linux WU. The reason for the reduce pts on linux is really due to 1 person, Mr Kermit. Even before the betas were released, the pts for c4cw has been going down the drain. Mr Kermit has been crunching lots and lots of c4cw WUs and his machine are very, very efficient.
Now, I maybe wrong that Mr Kermit is the caused, but it is still true that the pts for c4cw has been going down before the betas were release. Used to get about 50 pts per Linux WU, now it is not even 40.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 14, 2010 11:31:11 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

anhhai, nothing to do with Mr.Kermit. Even through the short series of beta we see the impact of credit on Windows and Linux dropping. The same will happen in production. If you look at my previous post you see 72-73 credit for Windows.... right before this beta test which is the very same I got on Windows at the beginning of target02, months ago.

Opposed to other sciences, the C4CW was benchmarked to give X credit for 1 mean C4CW work unit of a few thousand beta tasks, before the project was launched. If then a C4CW task is run under Windows and it takes 2 units of time on that platform, but only 1.5 on Linux, the Linux IDENTICAL task got the rato credit... the 48-50 v 72-73... on all my devices. There's more discrepancies that is way beyond this thread or I am prepared to talk about here, such as the ZR credit versus same ZR task but in quorum 2, passing through the inconclusive cycle. Been down the lane too many times... on AND offline discussed for years... expectation nul, hope sunk in shoes.

--//--
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Dec 14, 2010 12:24:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
deltavee
Ace Cruncher
Texas Hill Country
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 4848
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

After my Inconclusive, my wingman had this error:

Result Name: BETA_ c4cw_ target02_ 074908819_ 1--
<core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
(0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
Commandline = projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcg_beta12_lmps_6.14_windows_intelx86 -screen none -in in.wcg.acc -var wcgsteps1 1000 -var wcgsteps2 10000 -var loop 0 -var restart 0 -var rinterval 100 -var ifile in.wcg.acc -var wcgseed 74908819
[05:51:29] Percent complete = 0.909008
[05:52:43] Percent complete = 1.818017
[05:53:56] Percent complete = 2.727025
[05:55:10] Percent complete = 3.636033
[05:56:25] Percent complete = 4.545041
Abort called errorcode = 1

</stderr_txt>
]]>
----------------------------------------

[Dec 14, 2010 2:21:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
nanoprobe
Master Cruncher
Classified
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Post Count: 2998
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

After my Inconclusive, my wingman had this error:

Was that WU sent out again for someone else to run?
Looks like all of my inconclusives except 1 have validated. It's still waiting for a wingman report.
----------------------------------------
In 1969 I took an oath to defend and protect the U S Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and Domestic. There was no expiration date.


[Dec 14, 2010 2:34:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
deltavee
Ace Cruncher
Texas Hill Country
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 4848
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Nanoprobe, It was sent out again with a short fuse, 30 hours.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 14, 2010 2:42:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Somervillejudson@netscape.net
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: May 16, 2008
Post Count: 1065
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Mr. Kermit has really helped WCG and even if his work some how effected the points, which according to Sekerob it does not, I would rather have his contribution and lose points then to not have his contributions.
[Dec 14, 2010 2:53:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Post Count: 839
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Mr. Kermit has really helped WCG and even if his work some how effected the points, which according to Sekerob it does not, I would rather have his contribution and lose points then to not have his contributions.



I would rather have his contribution too. I was only pointing it out to help isolate the cause. I agree that the 5000 WUs had an affect on our pts, but I personally saw the pts for linux WUs of c4cw go downhill before the betas were release. Last week we were getting about 50 per WU, yesterday morning before the beta release, we were getting 43. Hours after the beta release we were getting less then 40. Don't know what we are getting now.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 14, 2010 4:30:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1316
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Nanoprobe, It was sent out again with a short fuse, 30 hours.

@deltavee:

BETA_ c4cw_ target02_ 074908819_ 2-- 614 Valid 14/12/10 08:29:49 14/12/10 16:25:35 3.59 45.9 / 50.3 --> My resend
BETA_ c4cw_ target02_ 074908819_ 1-- 614 Error 13/12/10 21:50:08 14/12/10 08:29:44 0.10 1.9 / 0.0
BETA_ c4cw_ target02_ 074908819_ 0-- 614 Valid 13/12/10 19:36:08 13/12/10 21:47:11 2.08 42.5 / 50.3 --> your Inconclusive turned into valid.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 14, 2010 4:58:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
deltavee
Ace Cruncher
Texas Hill Country
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 4848
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Crystal Pellet, Thanks for covering me.
----------------------------------------

[Dec 14, 2010 5:41:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1452
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: C4CW beta test 12/13/2010

Any problem on win32, mac64 and linux64 machines over 11 WUs! Well done!

On win machine time 6+ hours -> ~4:50
----------------------------------------
[Dec 14, 2010 7:55:16 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 72   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread