Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 12
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 2146 times and has 11 replies Next Thread
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 1187
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Totals on Results Status Page

My only use for this is to query the current hours of WUs that are pending validation for a particular project. I think that people would be able to use it for other debugging purposes as well.

I would want it to show the total for the entire query when the filter button is clicked with the same information shown at the bottom (or top) of every page of the data returned. Pressing F5 would rerun the query (same as recliking filter) and give the same results unless a WU was just uploaded or validated. If you just downloaded a new WU then only the total number of WUs would increase. I don't think it would be something that would be part of the daily stats update.

Some have already ask for a "not valid" pick to be added to the list of status in the pulldown menu. A NOT option (as Sekerob has mentioned)might be more versatile since it could be used with any of the current status choices.

As for a "target reached" message suggested by skgiven, it would probably need to be part of the daily stats update although some might want it to be immediate.

Cheers coffee
----------------------------------------

[Nov 29, 2010 4:12:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Totals on Results Status Page

Not sure if my suggestion for a Runtime Target setting was rejected?
I don't mean to take away from the suggestion of a PV runtime tally, as I like the idea, but I think the main reason for it is to facilitate the cruncher reaching credit/runtime targets (badges). Not to say that a per project PV runtime total would not be useful. It would, and in its own right; for those that pay more attention to their turnover it would be nice to see how close you are to reaching your target by considering PVs and Valid WUs. Similar totals for other Result status categories would also be useful...
[Nov 30, 2010 2:08:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 12   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread