| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 67
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Has anyone else noticed that the chart showing how long each project has to go to completionhas eith disappeared or been hijacked...... :((
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello Mikek69
Your first post here with angry face , no nice isn“t It has been reported , probably will have to wait until Monday .. Thanks |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Apologies for angry face but I thought the link had been hijacked a search company. Won't do it again... I really meant to put this in instead
![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Is okey
![]() |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Assuming all batches being of fairly equal size/weight we're now, a guess, with batch 515
----------------------------------------17-01-2010 17:25:12 R00515_047fc4d3873c8229e0df6e8fb4f99e2e_03_000_15 of 650 or 79%... a few percent further ahead of the chart curve. Differently we did 16,266 years when 35000 proteins were done and now at 22,133 years we've done 51500. Translates to about 35 years per batch, leaving 135 * 35 = 4,725 years... that's at present 49 years per day 96 days. Do I hear blood rushing through the veins as this makes it spring break ;? (The scientists have been silent for 4 months now so they could do with a little stage appearance.) edit: see llhung reply below. It's 630 batches (or work units as he terms it)
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jan 19, 2010 4:06:42 PM] |
||
|
|
martin64
Senior Cruncher Germany Joined: May 11, 2009 Post Count: 445 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The scientists have been silent for 4 months now so they could do with a little stage appearance. Exactly my point. It is somehow odd, to say the least, that crunchers are more interested in the status of the project than the researchers appear to be... Regards, Martin ![]() |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The fact that the scientists forget to pass it to us does not mean that they are not interested with the status of their project. Actually, they are at the best place to know it.
---------------------------------------- But I understand your frustration and I hope they will remember their duty. Jean. |
||
|
|
martin64
Senior Cruncher Germany Joined: May 11, 2009 Post Count: 445 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The fact that the scientists forget to pass it to us does not mean that they are not interested with the status of their project. Sure - but they do not communicate enough in order to avoid that perception. I think when volunteers donate their computer time, it should be a matter of course to keep them informed... Take FAAH as a positive example in that sense. Regards, Martin ![]() |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 3010 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Perhaps the WCG Admin can give the scientist's a little nudge...
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I apologize for the lack of updates but the rice project is not being ignored.
I have finished a gpu accelerated version of the folding code. It is 2 orders of magnitude faster than the equivalent cpu code. It implements more accurate energy functions in the minimization but is otherwise the same algorithm. Obviously it will not be used in this project as it is so close to the end. I am beginning to analyze the results that have been returned. This is not a simple process given the huge number of structures that have been generated by the volunteers. Choosing the best structures would take at least 3 months in itself. I hope to use gpu accelerated code for this process too. Current we are validating the procedure on a test set where the sequences are similar to sequences of experimentally derived structures. In terms of workunits, if memory serves me correctly, we have identified 27,000 subunits from larger protein sequences. Along with the 36,000 original sequences this givesrise to 63,000 sequences total or 630 workunits. I will try to update the website later this week or beginning of the next week. Again sorry for the lack of updates. The efforts of the volunteers is certainly appreciated. Thanks for your patience Hong |
||
|
|
|