Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 67
Posts: 67   Pages: 7   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 525450 times and has 66 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
angry Re: Please update status

Has anyone else noticed that the chart showing how long each project has to go to completionhas eith disappeared or been hijacked...... :((
[Dec 26, 2009 10:24:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

Hello Mikek69

Your first post here with angry face , no nice isn“t



It has been reported , probably will have to wait until Monday ..


Thanks
[Dec 26, 2009 11:19:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

Apologies for angry face but I thought the link had been hijacked a search company. Won't do it again... I really meant to put this in instead crying
[Dec 26, 2009 11:31:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

Is okey wink
[Dec 27, 2009 12:07:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

Assuming all batches being of fairly equal size/weight we're now, a guess, with batch 515

17-01-2010 17:25:12 R00515_047fc4d3873c8229e0df6e8fb4f99e2e_03_000_15

of 650 or 79%... a few percent further ahead of the chart curve.

Differently we did 16,266 years when 35000 proteins were done and now at 22,133 years we've done 51500. Translates to about 35 years per batch, leaving 135 * 35 = 4,725 years... that's at present 49 years per day 96 days. Do I hear blood rushing through the veins as this makes it spring break ;?

(The scientists have been silent for 4 months now so they could do with a little stage appearance.)

edit: see llhung reply below. It's 630 batches (or work units as he terms it)
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Jan 19, 2010 4:06:42 PM]
[Jan 17, 2010 4:53:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
martin64
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: May 11, 2009
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

The scientists have been silent for 4 months now so they could do with a little stage appearance.

Exactly my point. It is somehow odd, to say the least, that crunchers are more interested in the status of the project than the researchers appear to be... praying

Regards,
Martin
----------------------------------------

[Jan 18, 2010 10:18:23 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

The fact that the scientists forget to pass it to us does not mean that they are not interested with the status of their project. Actually, they are at the best place to know it. smile

But I understand your frustration and I hope they will remember their duty. Jean.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
[Jan 19, 2010 6:31:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
martin64
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: May 11, 2009
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

The fact that the scientists forget to pass it to us does not mean that they are not interested with the status of their project.

Sure - but they do not communicate enough in order to avoid that perception. I think when volunteers donate their computer time, it should be a matter of course to keep them informed...
Take FAAH as a positive example in that sense.

Regards,
Martin
----------------------------------------

[Jan 19, 2010 10:47:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 3010
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

Perhaps the WCG Admin can give the scientist's a little nudge... wink
----------------------------------------

[Jan 19, 2010 12:04:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Please update status

I apologize for the lack of updates but the rice project is not being ignored.

I have finished a gpu accelerated version of the folding code. It is 2 orders of magnitude faster than the equivalent cpu code. It implements more accurate energy functions in the minimization but is otherwise the same algorithm. Obviously it will not be used in this project as it is so close to the end.

I am beginning to analyze the results that have been returned. This is not a simple process given the huge number of structures that have been generated by the volunteers. Choosing the best structures would take at least 3 months in itself. I hope to use gpu accelerated code for this process too. Current we are validating the procedure on a test set where the sequences are similar to sequences of experimentally derived structures.

In terms of workunits, if memory serves me correctly, we have identified 27,000 subunits from larger protein sequences. Along with the 36,000 original sequences this givesrise to 63,000 sequences total or 630 workunits.

I will try to update the website later this week or beginning of the next week.

Again sorry for the lack of updates. The efforts of the volunteers is certainly appreciated.

Thanks for your patience

Hong
[Jan 19, 2010 4:01:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 67   Pages: 7   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread