| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
|
| Author |
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ok an emerald DDDT
---------------------------------------- It's a green one to me -- It's almost in production http://uk.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=98891 Been watching the Aptera's progress for a while now. The Hybrid version gets 300mpg (small ic engine just to charge the batteries not drive the wheels) and no requirement for a power socket. I think way back when petrol was that much cheaper at sub £1/litre it would have taken 4 years for me to recoup the price of the car in just the tax (Fuel Duty + VAT) I wouldn't be paying out Now???? That 300mpg is in US Gallons.... close to 360mpg Imp Gallon !!! No wonder it doesn't get Government support. ![]() |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
On top of the appalling disaster that was out of anyone's control is the disaster that is entirely man made
----------------------------------------http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/04/11/uk-japan-idUKTRE72A0UU20110411 Japan set to extend nuclear evacuation zone Four weeks after the worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl quarter of a century ago, the government was moving to extend a 20 km (12 mile) evacuation zone due to high levels of radiation, the Asahi newspaper reported. The government has so far refused to widen the zone, despite being urged to by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)and countries like the United States and Australia advising its citizens to stay 80 kms away from the plant. The Asahi said the government would extend the zone to 30 kms in certain areas, depending on wind direction, and residents would be given a week to prepare for evacuation. The Japan Times said authorities would soon forcibly close the 20 km zone, stopping people returning to their shattered homes to pick through the rubble for belongings. What really is the truth? The cover up is at least as bad as during Chernobyl. Clean, Safe and Carbon Neutral ![]() Of course it is ![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by David Autumns at Apr 11, 2011 6:27:18 AM] |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
On top of the appalling disaster that was out of anyone's control is the disaster that is entirely man made http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/04/11/uk-japan-idUKTRE72A0UU20110411 Japan set to extend nuclear evacuation zone Four weeks after the worst nuclear crisis since Chernobyl quarter of a century ago, the government was moving to extend a 20 km (12 mile) evacuation zone due to high levels of radiation, the Asahi newspaper reported. The government has so far refused to widen the zone, despite being urged to by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)and countries like the United States and Australia advising its citizens to stay 80 kms away from the plant. The Asahi said the government would extend the zone to 30 kms in certain areas, depending on wind direction, and residents would be given a week to prepare for evacuation. The Japan Times said authorities would soon forcibly close the 20 km zone, stopping people returning to their shattered homes to pick through the rubble for belongings. What really is the truth? The cover up is at least as bad as during Chernobyl. Clean, Safe and Carbon Neutral ![]() Of course it is ![]() We probably will never know the truth and they had another quake last night our time--It looks as if no one was thinking building on a fault zone--we have no choice here in the US as our esteemed president will not allow drilling anywhere--hope to God it will only last until 2013 |
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
http://www.iaea.org/press/?p=2029
----------------------------------------The nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi is now rated as a level 7 âMajor Accidentâ on INES. Level 7 is the most serious level on INES and is used to describe an event comprised of âA major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures.â Japanese authorities notified the IAEA in advance of the public announcement and the formal submission of the new provisional rating. The new provisional rating considers the accidents that occurred at Units 1, 2 and 3 as a single event on INES. Previously, separate INES Level 5 ratings had been applied for Units 1, 2 and 3. The provisional INES Level 3 rating assigned for Unit 4 still applies. The re-evaluation of the Fukushima Daiichi provisional INES rating resulted from an estimate of the total amount of radioactivity released to the environment from the nuclear plant. NISA estimates that the amount of radioactive material released to the atmosphere is approximately 10 percent of the 1986 Chernobyl accident, which is the only other nuclear accident to have been rated a Level 7 event. This was clear to see but with the amount of global vested interest placed in nuclear's "environmentally friendly" claims it has taken, like Chernobyl, too long to admit to. Atrocious profit in front of the health and wellbeing of the citizens of Japan There is nothing new under the Sun. Dave ![]() |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
http://www.iaea.org/press/?p=2029 The nuclear accident at Fukushima Daiichi is now rated as a level 7 âMajor Accidentâ on INES. Level 7 is the most serious level on INES and is used to describe an event comprised of âA major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures.â Japanese authorities notified the IAEA in advance of the public announcement and the formal submission of the new provisional rating. The new provisional rating considers the accidents that occurred at Units 1, 2 and 3 as a single event on INES. Previously, separate INES Level 5 ratings had been applied for Units 1, 2 and 3. The provisional INES Level 3 rating assigned for Unit 4 still applies. The re-evaluation of the Fukushima Daiichi provisional INES rating resulted from an estimate of the total amount of radioactivity released to the environment from the nuclear plant. NISA estimates that the amount of radioactive material released to the atmosphere is approximately 10 percent of the 1986 Chernobyl accident, which is the only other nuclear accident to have been rated a Level 7 event. This was clear to see but with the amount of global vested interest placed in nuclear's "environmentally friendly" claims it has taken, like Chernobyl, too long to admit to. Atrocious profit in front of the health and wellbeing of the citizens of Japan There is nothing new under the Sun. Dave You are correct and am thinking of changing my feeble mind of nuclear energy--i did support it until now ![]() |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Solar Activity Heats Up-- http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/14apr_thewatchedpot/
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
How the Ice in Your Drink is Imperiling the Planet
----------------------------------------Read more: http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/04/14/h...the-planet/#ixzz1JadQo8rP |
||
|
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Don't do the ice in the drink thing, and it's not big in the UK. Does this mean we are not Imperiling the Planet?
|
||
|
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Don't do the ice in the drink thing, and it's not big in the UK. Does this mean we are not Imperiling the Planet? Don't make ice or buy it--wait until winter and get it from the rivers and ponds then store it underground in sawdust---help save the solar system!!! |
||
|
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Don't make ice or buy it--wait until winter and get it from the rivers and ponds then store it underground in sawdust---help save the solar system!!! I'm waiting for icebergs to come this way, to see if the UK tries to sell them back to the Inuit. If not, ice-tea could be on the menu. Maybe they will buy that. |
||
|
|
|