This one, self updating, so bookmark if you will. Trying to get my head around how winter peak 2010 came 26 day later than 2009, had the same extent, yet as of yesterday, 545,000 km^2 has gone more since April 18 and 2010 stands at 337,000 less in absolute terms. Going to hunt for Bueller to get an answer. Is it Joules instead of Watts doing this :?

Price: €9.45

Will be delivered in 3-5 workdays
In "Noise: Lies, Damned Lies, and Denial of Global Warming" statistician Grant Foster shows how the manipulation of figures can be used to mislead the average person about global climate change. Using clear, plain language that can easily be understood by anyone, regardless of math grades, Foster arms the reader with the critical thinking skills necessary to help discern the signal of fact from the noise of misinformation.

Official data indicate that the past 10 years were the warmest on record globally. In England, this led to plumper and riper grapes most seasons, especially for sparkling wines. The number of vineyards in the U.K. jumped to 416 in 2008 from 363 in 2000, according the trade group English Wine Producers.

"Just 20 years ago, it was really difficult to make good wine in cooler climate areas," says Gregory Jones, who studies the effect of climate change on the global wine industry at Southern Oregon University. "Now it's not such a challenge."

With the help of warmer summers, "some of the risk of making sparkling wine here is gone," says Mike Roberts, founder and chief winemaker of the Ridgeview estate here, 45 miles south of London. "We have everything going for us to out-Champagne Champagne."

Last year, the fifth-hottest on record, Ridgeview's grapes ripened two weeks earlier than usual, allowing for the harvest to be brought in before the onset of wet October weather. Mr. Roberts and other English winemakers say 2009 was one of the best growing seasons they've seen.

Yep it has glissaded in amongst it's peers, it is no longer the 1st placed outlier in the JAXA data

Still not on an inexorably decline or indeed unusual in any way

We regularly lose 3 Belgium's worth of Sea Ice Extent a day at the North Pole at this time of year. In another 6 months it will be returning at the same rate

Just like it has always done while we have been able to observe it

Dave

...

For DA we've got something else... it was coming. Sea Ice Extent, Sea Ice Area and yes, now it's there, Sea Ice Volume, updated on a bi-daily basis... The Real Real stuff. It ain't looking good and must explain why that layer as seen from space is disappearing as, yes... snow for that rather spotless sun.



http://psc.apl.washington.edu/ArcticSeaiceVolume/IceVolume.php

Now reading charts has never been my strength, so with the number typed out it may be more impressive. 8 thousand cubic kilometers negative anomaly. How many watts would that take to do that in such a short time?

Wonder when global cooling is going to set in?

PS, BIIIIG numbers, if flattened to 1 meter thick, it's

8,000,000,000,000 meters square surface missing. Woah, that's more than half of the Arctic winter peak and a very very large percent of Single Year Ice that is expected to have gone by September.

May have the zero's wrong... easy to be blinded by big numbers ;P