| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together Phase 2 BETA |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Locked Total posts in this thread: 192
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
WU BETA_ erag_ a093_ ps0000_ 2-- errored after 32 hours. The result log is huge. Here are the relevant excerpts. I would be glad to post any additional information if requested.
Excerpts from Result Log Result Name: BETA_ erag_ a093_ ps0000_ 2-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
joneill, we are not going to send out replacements for the error work units on this beta. some may have been sent out but this has been stopped due to the high error rate. We will have another beta once we figure out these errors.
-Uplinger |
||
|
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I received 9 Betas this time. 1 is Valid, 2 are Pending Validation, 5 Errored, and 1 Too Late. I don't understand that "Too Late" result. It was returned ~3.5 hours from when it was received. When first returned it was Pending Validation.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: May 21, 2007 Post Count: 391 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
just wondering how would these results be in quorum if there's no repair WUs assuming there is 1 successful WU?
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: May 21, 2007 Post Count: 391 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
As the nature of these type "A" are so extensive (CPU/RAM/HD/Network), it has to be sent out to a dedicated crunching rig. Thus can be measured by rDCF.
----------------------------------------Lets say it was sent out to a crunching rig who do <8hrs per day and he uses this rig for work or something else. We all know that this WU will checkpoint 50 times. Depending on the speed of the rig, it may checkpoint between 1hr to 2hrs. If the user reboots or shutdown the machine, more or less 2hrs will be lost. And to reach completion (ave 50hrs), it needs 6.25 days plus will add 2 days for weekends. That will give us 1.75days leeway assuming the deadline is 10days. Is it enough for all these reboots, shutdown and what not? |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
I think you're confusing rDCF with the Active_frac, the first an indication of performance in relation to the benchmark, the second the amount of time that is measured over a sliding period of time that the computer is on and allowed to crunch. That the servers get told on each contact so it can determine if the client is foreseeably able to finish the work. A message in the client log would state something like:
----------------------------------------17/07/2008 17:33:35|World Community Grid|Message from server: (won't finish in time) Computer on 99.6% of time, BOINC on 98.7% of that You'll be finding out pretty quick if by your scenario the unit can be finished in time. For now, it's speculation, 10 days on 60 hours requiring 6 hours a day. With the <checkpoint_debug> flag on the timing of switching off the computer can be reasonably well managed to ensure the least time is lost on computer wakeup.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Oct 8, 2009 5:50:32 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
PS, remember there are not too many A types to go around in the pool, the ratio being 2 A for 4 B for 10,000 C (quorum 2)
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
PecosRiverM
Veteran Cruncher The Great State of Texas Joined: Apr 27, 2007 Post Count: 1053 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Well after 32 hrs looks like I'm in good company.
---------------------------------------- Result Name: BETA_ erag_ a060_ ps0000_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've had 1 WU error out so far, and nobody else seems to have reported the same error, even though it appears a wingman had the same one (and the other wingman had the more-common code 29)...
From StdOutDae
I wish I could add anything from the Messages tab in BOINC but it mysteriously stopped writing to that tab for about 6.5 hours during which the error occurred. Here's the top section from that, though...
I did have the section that showed the gap, but I was almost ready to click 'Reply to the post' when I hit the 'Sleep' key by accident and ultimately found out there's no way to wake fedora back up without rebooting (I probably have something configured wrong, though). So I just got done assembling all these data again. Hope that helps. This is now the 3rd [re]assembly and attempt to post it... 2nd attempt resulted in World Community Grid Forums » Error !!! The error message is: Error executing SQL in PostDAOImplJDBC.create. Probably from the Results log, so I removed about 400 lines from it. Hmmm... preview shows some of my typing disappearing off the right-edge of the screen. are the code tags screwing the formatting outside their range? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Just finished with quite a result log:
BETA_ erag_ a019_ ps0000_ 2-- starbase4.command Pending Validation 10/6/09 20:04:31 10/9/09 15:10:44 63.45 747.0 / 0.0 Neither wingmen have replied as of this post. Wish I had had a couple more like them  |
||
|
|
|