| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: The Clean Energy Project Forum
Thread: New work available for the Clean Energy Project... |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 46
|
|
| Author |
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
My quad picked up a B unit, estimated at 5 hours. Hasn't started yet. Is it still advisable to keep them from running concurrently or was the PF issue fixed? I am running on my quad withoput any problems..very smooth to be frank.  
Cheers ! GIB@
 Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Can anyone tell me what is this?
----------------------------------------20/03/2009 06:19:00 a.m.|World Community Grid|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 1329323 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Message from server: No work sent 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Message from server: No work available for the applications you have selected. Please check your settings on the website. 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Message from server: (won't finish in time) Computer on 80.3% of time, BOINC on 97.4% of that I guess is from the CEP, but I don't understand the messages, is like I was behind schedule or something, I don't get error messages that make sense like I've seen on other posts. Thanks. Regards. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 20, 2009 11:14:22 AM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Nobody is claiming they're not running 'smooth' concurrently on a quad, with enough brute power, GIBA. Problem is, that 1 at the time makes results on my Q6600 quad and duo centrino run 20% faster than 2 concurrent and 4 they run even longer. So, I've set up a profile that pulls them in on low frequency, when available, currently HFCC, RICE, TCEP. That's when my systems hum best. For other setups it could be different, that will always be so.
----------------------------------------
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Mar 20, 2009 11:18:28 AM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Can anyone tell me what is this? 20/03/2009 06:19:00 a.m.|World Community Grid|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 1329323 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Message from server: No work sent 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Message from server: No work available for the applications you have selected. Please check your settings on the website. 20/03/2009 06:19:05 a.m.|World Community Grid|Message from server: (won't finish in time) Computer on 80.3% of time, BOINC on 97.4% of that I guess is from the CEP, but I don't understand the messages, is like I was behind schedule or something, I don't get error messages that make sense like I've seen on other posts. Thanks. Regards. What's your buffer/cache size like Saul and how many hours a day has the client been running on average in the past few weeks?
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My quad picked up a B unit, estimated at 5 hours. Hasn't started yet. Is it still advisable to keep them from running concurrently or was the PF issue fixed? Earlier one of my quads had a constant page fault delta of 6000 so the PF issue is still there *edit* Currently constant at 8500 on a different machine (28% complete)  [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Mar 20, 2009 12:25:05 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I am running CEP on my single core systems, which are slower, but they can only have one WU at a time.
Reached 11 years and 7M points today  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
What's your buffer/cache size like Saul and how many hours a day has the client been running on average in the past few weeks? I modified the cache from its default to 14 days only with DDDT, HFCC, Rice & CEP to get them to gold and then I'll change to 'All projects' as usual. I've reduced the buffer to 3 days now. According to my stats I've 1 CEP WU completed. Cheers. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Reached 11 years and 7M points today Congrats astrolab |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Saul,
----------------------------------------Well, not sure how you got 14 days in there when 10 is max, but given the 10 days deadline just up from 9 on DDDT, FAAH, HCC and HFCC and 12 days on RICE & CEP, your client is thinking it is in deep deadline problems, which is why there was the overcommit line Computer on 80.3% of time, BOINC on 97.4% of that. Just let it run until things have stabilized at 3 days, then the client will start fetching work again.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 2 times, last edit by Sekerob at Mar 20, 2009 6:50:20 PM] |
||
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Well, not sure how you got 14 days in there when 10 is max... In the website it's quite simple: you enter 14 and you save!  I have just tried and there is no validity checking.  However I have not pushed the test to see if 14 is reduced to 10 or rejected when the client receives it. In BoincMgr local preferences the maximum 10 is enforced correctly. Honestly when I decided to do the test I was expecting the opposite: accepted in local preferences and rejected in the website. Cheers. Jean. |
||
|
|
|