Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1016 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
confused how about a preference order list of projects to work on?

What I have in mind is this:

say there are 6 projects to work on

1) nose pickers
2) corn pickers
3) citrus pickers
4) horse pickers
5) prune pickers
6) beta pickers

as it stands now; we can select which projects we would like to participate in; and optionally specify to participate in beta pickers as well as choosing if there aren't any elements in my preferred list; work on what ever is available.

What I'd really like to see is this:

pref
order project
2 1) nose pickers
3 2) corn pickers
6 3) citrus pickers
5 4) horse pickers
4 5) prune pickers
1 6) beta pickers

meaning when the scheduler looks for work for a participating machine; it looks first for the beta pickers project; then the nose pickers project and so on.

Wadaya say? sick
[Mar 8, 2009 3:16:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: how about a preference order list of projects to work on?

....which is the same as was asked for here a while ago....

http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=24164
[Mar 8, 2009 3:21:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: how about a preference order list of projects to work on?

Effectively, previously requested as indicated, similar to cross-project weighting, internal project weighting. The only reason I like an A and B type only, not more is technical. Some machines, those from spec able to run particular jobs, do not run them successfully at a very high rate. E.g. certain configurations absolute or hardly ever run HPF2 properly. Choose the "if there is no work..." would still fetch them and chew the unchewable, hang, BSOD, what not, but mostly, generate long list of errors, bad for efficiency, bad for other crunchers as it generates rush jobs.

More than A/B I do not like, for this IS the World Community Grid, but that's a personal view.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Mar 8, 2009 3:30:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread