| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Teams
Thread:  Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 28 |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 602
|
|
| Author |
|
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 08/07 - All Members:
----------------------------------------Team rank movement report =========================
Points milestones report ======================== Dataman reached 8,000,000 points  Vuj reached 2,000,000 points Runtime milestones report ========================= No runtime milestones found.  Results returned milestones report ================================== wrr returned their 2,800th result New members report ================== No new members found. Retired members report ====================== No new retired members found. For the week as a team: Statistics Total Run Time Points Results Team Records: Results Returned: 12/19/2007 2,522 Points: 12/19/2007 379,990 Runtime: 01/25/2006 1:123:00:53:34 Good crunching folks!!!! |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 08/07 - Active Members
----------------------------------------Active team members report ==========================
Note: Active members are those who earned points in the prior 30 days. Top Ten active members returning points today: 01: Dataman - 47,783 points 02: Blizzie - 21,839 points 03: Jonathan Figdor - 19,030 points 04: marysduby - 18,654 points 05: parmesian - 16,042 points 06: Fanie - 14,650 points 07: Esteban69 - 9,755 points 08: kkelson - 9,588 points 09: keithhenry - 9,577 points 10: stares - 9,253 points Total points returned today: 230,878 Active members returning points today: 40 Average points per member active today: 5771.95 |
|||
|
||||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18667 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Nice milestones today folks! Man, I'm gonna regret letting myself start looking at PCs tonight in the morning. I should know better than that!
---------------------------------------- Blizzie, will probably be looking for your thoughts/advice later. |
|||
|
||||
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
02: Blizzie - 21,839 points 03: Jonathan Figdor - 19,030 points   |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
......CONGRATULATIONS DATAMAN ON REACHING 8,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!...... |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
...........CONGRATULATIONS VUJ ON REACHING 2,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!........... |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
02: Blizzie - 21,839 points 03: Jonathan Figdor - 19,030 points Your Quad needs more overclocking. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 8, 2008 3:28:29 AM] |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My 5 year old can tell the difference between the computers that she's used in her pre-K class, day care and now at kindergarden and LeapFrog's "My First Computer" she's had (good for getting use to using a mouse and keyboard). Looks like Santa's going to have to get her a desktop this year. So here's one for you. Given the choice between: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E8500 Processor (3.16GHz 1333MHz 6MBL2) and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Processor (2.50GHz 1333MHz 6MBL2) assuming all else (including cost) is equal, which is better (will crunch more)? The quad of course will crunch four WUs at a time but at 25 percent slower than the duo. I've read the arguements that, while a duo is noticably better that a single core, a quad doesn't give you the same proportional gain in bang over a duo. I suspect that may be true in terms of the OS and normal everyday use but not so when it comes to crunching. Yes, the OS affects crunching but it's more BOINC using the cores than the OS. Given a WU that takes X amount of time, in the time it takes the duo to do two, the quad would do three even though it's 25 percent slower, at least if I figure it right. I also have a choice between Vista Business and Vista Ultimate. As I see it, ultimate gets me drive-level data encryption and some multimedia bells and whistles. She's not going to be playing the high end graphics intensive games, watching movies or such on it, or doing fancy multimedia stuff so I don't see any gain from Ultimate. It's going to be bad enough having to deal with Vista as it is. Are you considering the Q6600 too? Mine has performed really well and with overclocking, 3ghz per core is a very attainable goal. That and its pretty cheap. |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
02: Blizzie - 21,839 points 03: Jonathan Figdor - 19,030 points Your Quad needs more overclocking. You know it! I need to fix that heatsink stat! |
|||
|
||||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My 5 year old can tell the difference between the computers that she's used in her pre-K class, day care and now at kindergarden and LeapFrog's "My First Computer" she's had (good for getting use to using a mouse and keyboard). Looks like Santa's going to have to get her a desktop this year. So here's one for you. Given the choice between: Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E8500 Processor (3.16GHz 1333MHz 6MBL2) and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Processor (2.50GHz 1333MHz 6MBL2) assuming all else (including cost) is equal, which is better (will crunch more)? The quad of course will crunch four WUs at a time but at 25 percent slower than the duo. I've read the arguements that, while a duo is noticably better that a single core, a quad doesn't give you the same proportional gain in bang over a duo. I suspect that may be true in terms of the OS and normal everyday use but not so when it comes to crunching. Yes, the OS affects crunching but it's more BOINC using the cores than the OS. Given a WU that takes X amount of time, in the time it takes the duo to do two, the quad would do three even though it's 25 percent slower, at least if I figure it right. I also have a choice between Vista Business and Vista Ultimate. As I see it, ultimate gets me drive-level data encryption and some multimedia bells and whistles. She's not going to be playing the high end graphics intensive games, watching movies or such on it, or doing fancy multimedia stuff so I don't see any gain from Ultimate. It's going to be bad enough having to deal with Vista as it is. Are you considering the Q6600 too? Mine has performed really well and with overclocking, 3ghz per core is a very attainable goal. That and its pretty cheap. Quad for crunching, graphic design, photoshop, video edit, etc. Duo has the better core speed so it's better for gaming, everyday usage. I'd go with the Quad over the Duo. Vista Ultimate's BitLocker Encryption only works on some BIOS motherboards. Make sure to do some research before hand. |
|||
|
||||
|
|