Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 26
|
![]() |
Author |
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have loaded in some new batches of work for Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together (DDD-T). We released 100 of them to start out with and those have an average runtime of 54 minutes with about half of the work units validated. We estimate the work units will run about an hour on the average machine. These shorter work units start with the numbering sequence 0201. Also, with these new work units the target molecule is different then the previous target for 0101 batches.
-Uplinger |
||
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's great news! We look forward to crunching them for you.
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I'm guessing these new WUs are for the implementation of this.
3,000,000 ligands against a single protein target every 2 weeks. We can do it! ![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Maybe i should read the OP as the first 100 only having this shorter run time? The first '201 arriving in the queue has the same projected TTC as the 101's still waiting to go thru.... is the flops estimate off or is it BOINC needing a wallop?
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Maybe i should read the OP as the first 100 only having this shorter run time? The first '201 arriving in the queue has the same projected TTC as the 101's still waiting to go thru.... is the flops estimate off or is it BOINC needing a wallop? I see the same thing as you do Sek. I have one 0201 queued and its TTC is 10:29:08. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, the estimated flops is off. It will correct give out a better estimation of the flops in the next few days. The estimation is based off what returned results over the past 24 hours so some of the 0201 batches will need to be returned for the estimation to get better.
-Uplinger |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Nifty, it's automated.... okay, I'll leave the hammer in the drawer (it's there for the just in case ;>)
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For feedback (no particular complain
----------------------------------------![]() I have watched the progress percentage for a while and it looks very strange. I don't know if this is also related to the estimated flops problem. The progress percentage is running from xx.000 % to about xx.090 % and then it jumps to xx+1.000 %. Between .000 and .090 the progress is by .001, apparently one step per second. The other surprising thing is that the remaining time is practically not changing during the counting and decreases only when jumping to the next percent. At this time it decreases by much, but still not enough though. When I started to watch the run time was less than 2 hours, the progress percentage was 70 % and the remaining time was still about 2.5 hours. Strange. I will see if it improves when Boinc's estimated total run time adjusts WU after WU. Also a checkpoint is taken when jumping to the next percent, i.e. about every 90 seconds instead of about 15 minutes for the older WUs. Edit: I forgot to say: running standard WCG's 5.10.22 under XP. ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by JmBoullier at Oct 27, 2007 4:12:27 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Mine all came in at normal estimated time but dropped almost immediatly the unit started, i'm on the second now and it's done in 32min. till i read this i figured there may have been a problem.
![]() |
||
|
ctimm46
Cruncher Joined: Apr 2, 2006 Post Count: 17 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not an issue -- simply a comment and a random one at that.
I don't know what it is but shorter work units tickle me. ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |