Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 42
Posts: 42   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 6115 times and has 41 replies Next Thread
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor
Normandy - France
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Post Count: 3716
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

3) Find the <bwdown> field and increase it to a number like 90000

knreed, I have just tried the trick (I am curious). Will see.

I have been surprised to find about 88,000 in my <bwdown> field while I have an ADSL at 512 kb only and throughputs around 30-40,000 ko at best. Maybe bwdown is expressed in uncompressed data?

Edit: Oh yes... I forgot it's for Linux only today! If I have read you well I shall have to do the trick again when Windows time comes because the bwdown value will have been reset at the next normal download?

Cheers. Jean.
----------------------------------------
Team--> Decrypthon -->Statistics/Join -->Thread
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by JmBoullier at Aug 31, 2007 4:37:35 AM]
[Aug 31, 2007 4:32:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

Have 245,960 showing as down with a profile limitation of 480 kb, reminding me that the restrictions may still not me functional (was is client or server side)?

Edit: kb of course
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Aug 31, 2007 3:14:53 PM]
[Aug 31, 2007 3:14:14 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

Okay, I've downloaded a unit. Here's some data you may find useful.

My initial <bwdown> was very low - I increased it to 90000 as you suggested. AFTER the massive download, the value had increased further to 124730. This is with BOINC 5.10.13, and suggests that that version significantly understates the bandwidth due to many small downloads (some of the tiny downloads clock as less than 100 bytes/s!).

The download itself took under 5 minutes, and the transfer rate crept up to about 490 KB/s. On average, it was:
31/08/2007 16:07:51|World Community Grid|[file_xfer] Throughput 321057 bytes/sec

This is on a 20 Mbit connection.
[Aug 31, 2007 3:21:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

Sekerob: the profile setting is in kilobytes/s, the <bwdown> element is in bytes/s (not that this is documented anywhere....)
[Aug 31, 2007 3:32:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

The BOINC 5.10.19+ client does a better job of measuring bandwidth. In particular, it does not count the time it takes to connect to the server and initiate the download.

This matters because many files downloaded are small and the connection time makes the download speed look slower then it really is.

Additionally, in the 5.10.19+ that number will be weighted based on the size of the download file. This will give it a more relevant measurement.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by knreed at Aug 31, 2007 3:44:30 PM]
[Aug 31, 2007 3:44:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

One more thing, check what you have set for bandwidth in your preferences. In particular check the fields: 'Maximum download rate'. This field will limit how fast your downloads are the field in the limit that is checked will be limited by this setting.

If you have this field set below 85 then BOINC will limit your downloads to slow enough that you will not be able to qualify. I would recommend raising this to at least 50% higher (i.e. 128).
[Aug 31, 2007 3:52:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

Some additional notes:

stderr mentions AutoDock. This is not AutoDock....

stderr also includes the old versioninfo error. Why?

Peak memory use (so far) is over 300 MB.

The IO read/write byte count is higher than I would expect, even given the checkpoint size. The process has written 3 GB, and it's only a third complete.
[Aug 31, 2007 6:57:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

Didactylos - can you give me a workunit where those messages are written?
[Aug 31, 2007 7:08:00 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

31/08/2007 16:08:04|World Community Grid|Starting task BETA_ach1_1_42_6 using beta2 version 510

stderr.txt:
Failed to get VersionInfo size: 1812
World Community Grid AutoDock (projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcg_beta2_wrf_5.10_windows_intelx86) version
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
ERROR: Restoring checkpoint failed. Unable to restore state!
Start_year/Start_Month/Start_Day::Start_Hour:Start_Minute:Start_Second Restart2002/12/18::0:0:0 0

[Aug 31, 2007 7:12:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Beta test of August 29

Oops - thanks for pointing that out. We will remove it the next time we release a version.
[Aug 31, 2007 8:19:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 42   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread