| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 42
|
|
| Author |
|
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3716 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
3) Find the <bwdown> field and increase it to a number like 90000 knreed, I have just tried the trick (I am curious). Will see. I have been surprised to find about 88,000 in my <bwdown> field while I have an ADSL at 512 kb only and throughputs around 30-40,000 ko at best. Maybe bwdown is expressed in uncompressed data? Edit: Oh yes... I forgot it's for Linux only today! If I have read you well I shall have to do the trick again when Windows time comes because the bwdown value will have been reset at the next normal download? Cheers. Jean. ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by JmBoullier at Aug 31, 2007 4:37:35 AM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Have 245,960 showing as down with a profile limitation of 480 kb, reminding me that the restrictions may still not me functional (was is client or server side)?
----------------------------------------Edit: kb of course
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Aug 31, 2007 3:14:53 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Okay, I've downloaded a unit. Here's some data you may find useful.
My initial <bwdown> was very low - I increased it to 90000 as you suggested. AFTER the massive download, the value had increased further to 124730. This is with BOINC 5.10.13, and suggests that that version significantly understates the bandwidth due to many small downloads (some of the tiny downloads clock as less than 100 bytes/s!). The download itself took under 5 minutes, and the transfer rate crept up to about 490 KB/s. On average, it was: 31/08/2007 16:07:51|World Community Grid|[file_xfer] Throughput 321057 bytes/sec This is on a 20 Mbit connection. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sekerob: the profile setting is in kilobytes/s, the <bwdown> element is in bytes/s (not that this is documented anywhere....)
|
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
The BOINC 5.10.19+ client does a better job of measuring bandwidth. In particular, it does not count the time it takes to connect to the server and initiate the download.
----------------------------------------This matters because many files downloaded are small and the connection time makes the download speed look slower then it really is. Additionally, in the 5.10.19+ that number will be weighted based on the size of the download file. This will give it a more relevant measurement. [Edit 1 times, last edit by knreed at Aug 31, 2007 3:44:30 PM] |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
One more thing, check what you have set for bandwidth in your preferences. In particular check the fields: 'Maximum download rate'. This field will limit how fast your downloads are the field in the limit that is checked will be limited by this setting.
If you have this field set below 85 then BOINC will limit your downloads to slow enough that you will not be able to qualify. I would recommend raising this to at least 50% higher (i.e. 128). |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Some additional notes:
stderr mentions AutoDock. This is not AutoDock.... stderr also includes the old versioninfo error. Why? Peak memory use (so far) is over 300 MB. The IO read/write byte count is higher than I would expect, even given the checkpoint size. The process has written 3 GB, and it's only a third complete. |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Didactylos - can you give me a workunit where those messages are written?
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
31/08/2007 16:08:04|World Community Grid|Starting task BETA_ach1_1_42_6 using beta2 version 510
stderr.txt: Failed to get VersionInfo size: 1812 World Community Grid AutoDock (projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcg_beta2_wrf_5.10_windows_intelx86) version INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. ERROR: Restoring checkpoint failed. Unable to restore state! Start_year/Start_Month/Start_Day::Start_Hour:Start_Minute:Start_Second Restart2002/12/18::0:0:0 0 |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Oops - thanks for pointing that out. We will remove it the next time we release a version.
|
||
|
|
|