| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 7
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I wasn't sure where to post this, so I'll try here... I got a question about dual core. I installed wcg when I bought my computer, since UDI didn't use more than a fraction of the cpu. But it looks like the wcg-client is working with two wu in the same time.
Is it working optimal this way? I thought the idea with dual core was to get both parts to cooperate, and make it alot more efficient this way than just the double. Is it possible to get all the cpu working with only one unit? Does the ram and graphic card have any impact when it comes to efficiency? |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The dual core runs two separate processes so all is fine
SMP folding@home with a dual core shows 4 running processes. |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The idea of a dual core is to be able to run two seperate processes efficiently at the same time rather than one using both - so assuming you are using the Boinc client, then everything is fine
![]() |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
oki, thanks..
|
||
|
|
Bearcat
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 6, 2007 Post Count: 2803 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Today, I was on my last 3 units before I do my upload. Decided to look at activity monitor (mac pro) and noticed all 4 cores were crunching even though only 3 units were being crunched. Seemed like 2 cores were working on one unit. Wonder whether letting all cores work on one unit at a time might be more efficient.
----------------------------------------Randy
Crunching for humanity since 2007!
![]() |
||
|
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I wonder whether there was just a coincidence where two cores got the same workunit, since multiples are sent out.
----------------------------------------It sounds like there would be a lot of thrashing and unpredictability of the next instruction...and a mess. Wouldn't just running 4 workunits in parallel be a lot simpler? How would anyone debug a problem?
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 1 times, last edit by retsof at May 23, 2007 3:01:05 AM] |
||
|
|
olympic
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jun 12, 2005 Post Count: 156 Status: Offline |
WCG science apps are not multi-threaded, so 2(or more) cores can't work on the same WU. Running 2 WU's simultaneously on a dual core CPU is just as good though and makes full use of the resources.
----------------------------------------I'm not familiar with a MAC OS, but in Windows, if you were to crunch 3 WU's on a quad core machine, the task manager would show 2 cores at 100% and the remaining 2 cores at 50%. In reality, cores 1,2 and 3 would be running at 100% and the fourth would be idle. But the task manager CPU monitor reflects resource usage more so than actual core usage. 2 cores at 100% and 2 at 50% is exactly the same resource-wise as 3 cores at 100% and 1 at idle. ![]() |
||
|
|
|