Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 11
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1184 times and has 10 replies Next Thread
retsof
Former Community Advisor
USA
Joined: Jul 31, 2005
Post Count: 6824
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Optimization of "hard drive storage" component of points

Exactly very little is used, so why is HD considered a factor in UD points? 1GB or 100GB, won't matter, but I don't think it's fair to the nontweakers that they aren't scoring as much as they can while the tweakers do (and the tweaker's excessive GB "donation" doesn't make their PC any better than equiv RAM/CPU).
The UD.EXE version makes uses of the HD factor, even though a high percentage is not used for these projects. United Devices wrote the program, and it is up to them to change it. We're just using the program. Just set the HD factor to 10 GB if you have that much and don't worry about it.

If you want less points and have dial-up, you are free to crunch at grid.org, which also uses the network factors of UD.EXE. It is ignored here.

The nontweakers also won't bother to change the UD throttle to 100% either.

The defaults are being set more and more to an average, not the highest possible tweak.

After all of that, we didn't write BOINC either. WCG contributes testing results, and hopefully BOINC will bring out improved versions.
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads
School i7 4770 8threads
Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads
Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads
Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads
Home i7 3540M 4threads50%
[Apr 3, 2007 8:54:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 11   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread