Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 10
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Sorry for my bad english.
I'd like to know if it's normal that i got no valid results for 3 results now. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Hello morre,
There has been a recent change. Due to controversy, results that are returned that are Valid are marked Invalid if they claim excessively high point scores and are awarded only half the points that the other Valid work units are awarded. This can produce a quorum of 3 with 2 Valid work units and 1 Invalid work unit. You can check this by going to the Results Status page and clicking on the work unit marked Invalid, to see the other work units in that quorum. If this has started happening to you, make sure that you are running the current recommended BOINC version ( http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php ). Our upcoming project will require BOINC 5.4 or later to run. Lawrence |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
To put that into easier English for you morre....
If you are using an optimised client such as crunch3r`s your claim will be marked invalid and reduced by half the credit given to the others . |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
ok...thx
I do claim much more points then the other results. But i think, i'm not using an optimized client. I'll try an reinstall. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Morra.
What type of computer do you have? Older, slower machines have a problem with the new point system and their results are now labelled as invalid, much of the time. Cheers. ozylynx ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I have an Intel Pentium 4 with 2,4 GHz, i think that machine is fast enough.
----------------------------------------I've reinstalled boinc. Client version changed from 5.5.0 to 5.4.11. Looks like i used an optimized client. Now looking forward for completing the next wu. I hope the problem is solved than. thanks for quick support ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 13, 2006 10:25:25 AM] |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Correct. BOiNC 5.5.0 is producing excessive benchmark values.
----------------------------------------What Lawrence said about 5.4 relates to the file compression feature for data transmission to and from the servers. Previous versions don't have that. cheers
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One of my computers gets some "invalid" results when I let it run faah projects. Client is 5.4.11 and computer is a 3 year old DELL for crying out loud. No optimised client and I obviously can't optimise that computer. Something needs to be done with the program as receiving half credit when I'm doing nothing wrong does not entice me to keep crunching.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Please post the hardware details
----------------------------------------CPU&speed Memory/Ram Copy past some quorum details for invalids u have where receiving half credit: Go to Results Status page and click on a WU name, then copy past the details of the 3 lines and highlight your result Go into the message log and post the benchmark values: Whetstone Dhrystone thanks
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
David_L6
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 24, 2006 Post Count: 296 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Please post the hardware details Dell Dimension 8300 CPU&speed Memory/Ram Intel P4 socket 478 3.4 GHz Northwood core 1.5 GB DDR PC3200 / 400 MHz Copy past some quorum details for invalids u have where receiving half credit: Go to Results Status page and click on a WU name, then copy past the details of the 3 lines and highlight your result I think this is what you asked for....... Workunit Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit faah0892_ bdb384_ mx7upj_ 09 Valid 11/12/2006 02:04:10 11/12/2006 10:34:27 5.09 53 / 54 faah0892_ bdb384_ mx7upj_ 09 Valid 11/12/2006 02:01:48 11/12/2006 17:35:13 9.26 55 / 54 faah0892_ bdb384_ mx7upj_ 09 Invalid 11/12/2006 01:55:21 11/13/2006 00:39:36 9.74 111 / 27 Go into the message log and post the benchmark values: Whetstone Dhrystone thanks Not there....... The higher of the two (Dhrystone I think) runs around 3500. I don't remember what the lower one is. ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |