Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 861 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Silly "time to completion" estimates

I have been running a mixture of faah and hdc tasks. On my machine, faah takes like 7 hours per unit to complete, and hdc 2:30 hours. They are different tasks altogether, with different requirements and completion times. However, when a faah task is completed, it drives the time of the waiting hdc tasks way up -- I have seen it go to 6:30 hours if a lot of faah tasks have been run without any hdc tasks in between. And, the other way round, hdc drives the faah estimates way down -- perhaps to 5 hours. This can cause problems with either too little work buffered (if estimates are low) or missed deadlines (if estimates are high)

This is not something major, but perhaps we could ask the BOINC developers to treat the two application types (faah and hdc) differently rather than have the one influence the other so much. Just a thought for the next release...
[Sep 22, 2006 9:36:14 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Silly "time to completion" estimates

You can voice directly at BOINC e.g. it's not solved in 5.4.11 and is not solved in 5.6.3...... the only thing i see is that a future BOINC uses a 'per WU' internal time marker which than correlates to the CPU hrz and from continuous monitored CPU efficiency (e.g. can be seen in BOINCview) it adapts to a closer number... but how frequent that recalibration should happen is difficult to determine.....at least before the next scheduled call for work would be my suggestion..... the saga will continue.

'To Completion' times
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Sep 22, 2006 9:51:27 AM]
[Sep 22, 2006 9:50:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Silly "time to completion" estimates

Hi barbanis,
BOINC is designed to work with independant projects, each using its own server. WCG is designed to run multiple projects through a single server. Combining the 2 is bound to produce some strange quirks. For the moment, BOINC time estimates do not understand that the WCG is running different projects with different times to completion.

Lawrence
[Sep 22, 2006 10:09:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread