Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 2
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 634 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Surprised about FAAH work being pulled out

i just read some work units were dropped because they caused 'too much paging' in computers.

were people complaining about this? are other users with better systems still able to work on these compounds?

thanks.
[Apr 29, 2006 11:16:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Surprised about FAAH work being pulled out

I think the problem was that the work units couldn't be sent to people with more virtual memory. It's possible that BOINC does check virtual memory, and so the work units could just be shifted from UD to BOINC hosts.

Or I could be completely wrong!
[May 2, 2006 1:11:20 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread