Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 8
|
![]() |
Author |
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Please consider adding a column to this page that gives a timestamp for when a workunit was validated. Some workunits can take many days before they validate. Once they do, they show with a Valid status but appear in the list with their Return Time. This makes it difficult to correlate which workunits validated today and were included in your work/points/runtime for today. Thanks!
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
keithhenry,
That is an exceptional idea. Unfortunately, right now BOINC does not store this information. I will see if it is something that could be added. thanks, Kevin |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kevin, just curious. I still like this idea. Knowing that there are bound to be 94322485483 other things on the list in front of it
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Interesting... Another thread was started 10 days ago for another enhancement request to same page, but never saw a reaction... BOINC Results Status Screen Enhancement
----------------------------------------![]()
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The WCG/boinc statistics seems to be a bit different than the standard BOINC results I've seen elsewhere, since much comes from the UD interface. (BOINC was added to the project later.)
----------------------------------------
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% |
||
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kevin, just curious. I still like this idea. Knowing that there are bound to be 94322485483 other things on the list in front of it ![]() ![]() It is doable but it will require a change to the BOINC source code, a new database column and then changes to the page. I would like this column also becuase I would like to know certain things such as the average length of time between the first result being sent and the workunit being validated. However, there are many things on the list so I cannot promise an implementation date. Also - I think in Sekerob's other thread he asked how long results stay on the result status page. They stay around until 4 days after the workunit is complete. A workunit is complete when all results for the workunit have reached a terminal status (such as valid, invalid, no reply, error, etc). Kevin |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Kevin for satisfying this old fart's curiosity
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Thanks Kevin for that Result Status list retention clarification. Still like to have a response to the other Result Status page tweak request, to put the number of bracketed Pending Validations/Inconclusives in the claims column, so in one view one can see for each unit, in progress, submitted etc what the quorum situation is i.e.
----------------------------------------59/00 (2), meaning 2 are on this WU in PV 00/00 (1), meaning 1 on this WU is PV 59/00 (3 in), 3 were submitted but are inclonclusive. 00/00 (2 pv), ...you're the last as always to send in the work etc The abbrevations would only be needed if the already submitted items have a different status then your own. Errors can logically be ignored as they do not contribute to the quorum establishment. No extra column would be required, but that's estetica. ciao
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
![]() |