Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 46
Posts: 46   Pages: 5   [ 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 13559 times and has 45 replies Next Thread
jul059
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 5, 2012
Post Count: 14
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Can't recognize ARM architecture

I'm running BalenaOS on a Raspberry pi 4, specifically the foldforcovid image, and I get the following error trying to update the project: "This project doesn't support computers of type aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"

Is there a solution? ARM should be supported on linux.
[May 20, 2020 3:09:30 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
DavidH
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 1, 2020
Post Count: 10
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

You would need to use a 32 bit ARM image. I had my raspberry running Ubuntu 64 and once I switched to 32 bit it started working
[May 20, 2020 3:24:04 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

I'm running BalenaOS on a Raspberry pi 4, specifically the foldforcovid image, and I get the following error trying to update the project: "This project doesn't support computers of type aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"

Is there a solution? ARM should be supported on linux.

Think for foldforcovid support you need to be at, foldforcovid or maybe Rosetta@home since the earned computing credits are going there according your link.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 20, 2020 6:47:44 AM]
[May 20, 2020 6:47:10 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
DavidH
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 1, 2020
Post Count: 10
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

Agreed. Rosetta has a 64 bit ARM support so you would have luck there. But in order to use WCG, you need to switch over to a 32 bit image
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by DavidH at May 20, 2020 12:13:46 PM]
[May 20, 2020 12:12:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jul059
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 5, 2012
Post Count: 14
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

You would need to use a 32 bit ARM image. I had my raspberry running Ubuntu 64 and once I switched to 32 bit it started working


That's what I was afraid of. That's too bad. Thank you!

To the others, Rosetta is working just fine, which is why I didn't ask on their forums.
[May 20, 2020 12:16:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Michael Goetz
Cruncher
United States
Joined: Dec 11, 2017
Post Count: 35
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

Is it possible to install the 32-bit support libraries, assuming such a thing exists for ARM? With 64 bit x86 Linux, lots of people have trouble running 32 bit BOINC projects out of the box. With the correct libraries installed, however, you could always get 32 bit to run under 64 bit Linux.

Is the same true for Linux ARM distributions?

There's also a BOINC client setting that will prevent 32 bit apps from running on a 64 bit machine, but that's usually off unless you turned it on. Check to make sure <no_alt_platform> is either 0, or not present at all, in cc_config.xml.
[May 20, 2020 3:16:43 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
DavidH
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 1, 2020
Post Count: 10
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

Michael,
I believe the fix would be a OpenPandemics executable that supports boinc platform code aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

right now, it appears platform code arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf is only supported for the ARM images (non android).

I posted this to the Beta thread for visibilty, but not sure if the folks will see it.
I would imagine the OpenPandemics can be complied for both ARM types since it is working on Android no issue...thoughts?
[May 20, 2020 3:29:42 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jul059
Cruncher
Joined: Apr 5, 2012
Post Count: 14
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

Michael,
I believe the fix would be a OpenPandemics executable that supports boinc platform code aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

right now, it appears platform code arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf is only supported for the ARM images (non android).

I posted this to the Beta thread for visibilty, but not sure if the folks will see it.
I would imagine the OpenPandemics can be complied for both ARM types since it is working on Android no issue...thoughts?


Indeed, since there are linux binaries and Android Aarch64 binaries, I don't think it would be too much work to have Aarch64 linux binaries.
[May 20, 2020 4:11:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

Just more beta to validate the compile is not producing gigo results.
[May 20, 2020 4:13:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
hchc
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Aug 15, 2006
Post Count: 753
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Can't recognize ARM architecture

I'd love to see 64-bit aarch64 Linux support for this project, and if it's just a matter of compiling the binary then testing, it shouldn't be a huge level of effort. I'm thinking about buying more efficient, cheap hardware specifically to contribute to OpenPandemics.
----------------------------------------
  • i5-7500 (Kaby Lake, 4C/4T) @ 3.4 GHz
  • i5-4590 (Haswell, 4C/4T) @ 3.3 GHz
  • i5-3570 (Broadwell, 4C/4T) @ 3.4 GHz

[May 22, 2020 1:04:52 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 46   Pages: 5   [ 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread