Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 315
Posts: 315   Pages: 32   [ Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 124106 times and has 314 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

The support isn't going away until October of this year but I may go ahead and remove the 32-bit architecture from my Ubuntu systems and see what fails.

I was thinking of that too. How do you remove it (Ubuntu 16.04/18.04)?

You may need to remove the i386 packages first:
sudo apt remove --purge `dpkg --get-selections | awk '/i386/{print $1}'`

Then remove the architecture
sudo dpkg --remove-architecture i386

The above process worked for me. I just tried it.
[Jun 20, 2019 8:36:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

The above process worked for me. I just tried it.

Very good. I tried it on my i7-3770 (Ubuntu 16.04) running Rosetta, and it did not bother a thing.
After a reboot, the BOINC log showed that the libraries were removed. Thanks.
[Jun 20, 2019 9:10:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
TPCBF
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Post Count: 2173
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Returning to Beta, got an ARP1 that is predicted to run 2.5 days. Why not sure, but maybe BOINC or servers are confused with short SCC1 and long ARP1 betas running at the same time. The credit should be glorious for a change.
Don't hold you breath. I had a lot that after +20h of runtime got the mere default of 37.1 (31.7?) points, less than WUs running for 1.5-2.5h got...

Ralf
[Jun 20, 2019 11:09:55 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PowerFactor
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Dec 9, 2016
Post Count: 4033
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

My server has completed 12-16 ARP units so far. 4 are valid, 4 are still processing, and 4-8 were valid (they disappeared from the results section, and I have a bad memory biggrin ). The ARP units complete after 17 hours of processing.
[Jun 21, 2019 3:57:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Pete Broad
Senior Cruncher
Wales
Joined: Jan 3, 2007
Post Count: 169
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

On further investigation it would seem that the memory requirements are higher, at least on Androids than they were on the previous non beta units. I was able to run 4 units with no problems on my 4 core Androids with 4gb of memory but now I can only run 2 or 3 at the most due to constant restarting of the units.

Pete
----------------------------------------

[Jun 21, 2019 7:33:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

On further investigation it would seem that the memory requirements are higher, at least on Androids than they were on the previous non beta units. I was able to run 4 units with no problems on my 4 core Androids with 4gb of memory but now I can only run 2 or 3 at the most due to constant restarting of the units.

Pete

Think your comment landed in the wrong Beta test thread. Go https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,41683 for Smash Childhood Cancer test
[Jun 21, 2019 8:34:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

The support isn't going away until October of this year but I may go ahead and remove the 32-bit architecture from my Ubuntu systems and see what fails. It was added way back in the CEP days as that was the only way to get those WU units. It may not be needed anymore


I run (and have run on a lot of devices) pure 64bit Debian for WCG machines and all work is 64bit for the same projects as you've outlined - I'm actually more surprised your device is requesting and running 32bit work units instead of 64bit ones. Obviously something within the BOINC ecosphere is requesting them, how else right? By any chance, do you accidentally have the 32bit version of `boinc-client` installed, not the 64bit one? Run "dpkg -l | grep boinc" and look at the 4th column, should be "amd64".

Anyways, you should have zero problems running without the 32bit subsystem installed. You'll probably see a slight performance increase in some places as it avoids some shims in the kernel (basically, a 32bit userland app running in 64bit kernel has to go through some processing, you're removing that need), but a slight increase in RAM usage in others (it's really dependent on the exact code and what data structures it uses). Google: "32 bit vs 64 bit memory consumption"
[Jun 21, 2019 1:36:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Those of us who have been here awhile couldn't run strictly 64-bit and expect to get the CEP1 work units. CEP1 was a 32-bit app. In order to run those work units on a 64-bit machine required one to add the 32-bit architecture so as to get a multiarch capability. Multiarch tells the server that I am a 64-bit machine but I am capable of running 32-bit apps if available. Hence, I was able to get the CEP1 work on a 64-bit machine. As I mentioned earlier, all apps now seem to be 64-bit but the graphics code seems to be the 32-bit Pentium Pro (i686) code. Not a problem for me as I don't use the graphics pieces but may be for others on desktop versions of Ubuntu that like to use the screensaver or like to look at the graphics pieces. My post was mainly intended for the techs but they are probably aware of it already. This will be my last post concerning this as it is off-topic for this thread
[Jun 21, 2019 2:06:13 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

I'm glad you posted this, Doneske, as it likely explains why I can't see the graphics on my 64-bit Ubuntu machine. I had only vaguely wondered why as I'm not very interested. However, I do think that this justifies posting in its own thread or, better still, a tech note from the techs in the help area.
[Jun 21, 2019 3:13:41 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
armstrdj
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Post Count: 695
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

All projects which have a 64 bit research application should also have the 64 bit graphics application. Is there a particular project you think is missing a 64 bit graphics application?

Thanks,
armstrdj
[Jun 21, 2019 6:50:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 315   Pages: 32   [ Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread