| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Community
Forum: Chat Room
Thread: 2990X - more than 2 months crunching per day .... |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 7
|
|
| Author |
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
 More than 2 Months per day from one CPU  3.4Ghz of X64 * 32 + hyperthreading ! 180W TDP I wish I had an excuse to have one of those  |
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I wish I had an excuse to have one of those Just do it! |
|||
|
||||
|
thunder7
Senior Cruncher Netherlands Joined: Mar 6, 2013 Post Count: 238 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Any tests on this (WCG speed, all-core turbo frequency) would interest me very much, since I have a quad opteron monster heating my office (and provide interesting background noise as well) - and this looks like a good replacement.
|
||
|
|
mdxi
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Dec 6, 2017 Post Count: 109 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Any tests on this (WCG speed, all-core turbo frequency) would interest me very much, since I have a quad opteron monster heating my office (and provide interesting background noise as well) - and this looks like a good replacement. I don't have data on boost clocks and such, but I expect you'd see massive gains just from the generational improvements in the Zen CPUs. One of my crunchboxes is a Ryzen R7 1700 -- that's 8c/16t at 3.2GHz. You can see its performance history here: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/device/...=4255598&deviceType=B Per core, you'll see about 10% speedups due to TR2 being Zen+ based rather than the original Zen. And as dangerous as extrapolation of this sort is, you can maybe get a "napkin math" estimate of TR2 performance by multiplying by 4, since it will have 32 cores to my R7's 8.  |
||
|
|
BladeD
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 28976 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Any tests on this (WCG speed, all-core turbo frequency) would interest me very much, since I have a quad opteron monster heating my office (and provide interesting background noise as well) - and this looks like a good replacement. I don't have data on boost clocks and such, but I expect you'd see massive gains just from the generational improvements in the Zen CPUs. One of my crunchboxes is a Ryzen R7 1700 -- that's 8c/16t at 3.2GHz. You can see its performance history here: https://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/ms/device/...=4255598&deviceType=B Per core, you'll see about 10% speedups due to TR2 being Zen+ based rather than the original Zen. And as dangerous as extrapolation of this sort is, you can maybe get a "napkin math" estimate of TR2 performance by multiplying by 4, since it will have 32 cores to my R7's 8. No, I can't...  You have requested to view the statistics for a device that is not yours. This is not allowed. ---------------------------------------- [Edit 1 times, last edit by BladeD at Jul 29, 2018 5:51:31 AM] |
|||
|
||||
|
mdxi
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Dec 6, 2017 Post Count: 109 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Ah, sorry. I didn't realize that page wasn't public. Here's the most recent data from it:
----------------------------------------
|
||
|
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/amd-ryzen-thr...4mb-cache-250w-cpu-retail
----------------------------------------Over 2 Months a day at a minimum of 96Ghz of Zen 2 Cores for a TDP of 250W It's always been fun watching the amazing efficiency improvements in CPU's and GPU's since this project began My first cruncher on the project was a Athlon 2100+ 32 bit single core running at 1733Mhz 72W on 180nm tech There's not even anyway you can compare this to the processor above as it shovels so much more per clock Even at it's slowest speed and ignoring all the other improvement available within it's die.... it would have taken 4KW (and the cooling) to match this CPU's clock rate and that's not the half of it Dave |
||
|
|
|