Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 28
|
![]() |
Author |
|
genhos
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2009 Post Count: 1103 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've managed to snag what appears to be an absolute monster of a WU, HST1_ 009693_ 000054_ AC0024_ T300_ F00091_ S00014_ 1--.
----------------------------------------It is 66% done with a runtime of 1 day and 20 hours with another estimated 23 hours to go. The laptop it is running on has been crunching the recent SCC units in under 3 hours so while it isn't the fastest machine in the world, I really didn't expect any unit here to be taking almost 3 days runtime. Anybody else got one of these behemoths? |
||
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2990 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My old (nearly 7 yr old) Lenovo T410 normally takes just under 2 days to crunch the 'biggie' HST WU's.
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
Jean-David Beyer
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Oct 2, 2007 Post Count: 339 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My big ones take about 16 hours.
----------------------------------------HST1_ 009496_ 000062_ AT0012_ T325_ F00074_ S00010_ 2-- DellT7600.local domain Valid 3/30/17 11:03:19 3/31/17 07:34:04 15.92 / 16.67 369.3 / 313.9 This is on a machine with processors like this: CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 0 @ 1.80GHz stepping 07 Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, 16-deep LBR, SandyBridge events, full-width counters, Intel PMU driver. ... version: 3 ... bit width: 48 ... generic registers: 8 ... value mask: 0000ffffffffffff ... max period: 0000ffffffffffff ... fixed-purpose events: 3 ... event mask: 00000007000000ff NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. Booting Node 0, Processors #1 #2 #3 Brought up 4 CPUs Total of 4 processors activated (14365.58 BogoMIPS). ![]() |
||
|
genhos
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2009 Post Count: 1103 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As I hadn't seen anything in the forum about units having such long runtimes it threw me seeing the estimated time to finish as over 1 day. Don't think I have seen any unit for any project I have run give such an estimate.
----------------------------------------The laptop is an AMD dual core running at about 2.1ghz. It has been plodding through the unit for the last 2 days at work, as it is the weekend it will have a break and then back to it on Monday. Glad that it should complete in time, as at that kind of runtime it isn't going to suit all users here at WCG. Someone who crunches for a couple of hours a day may not complete it in time. |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7745 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Any of the TB work units with T300,T325,T350 or T400 in their name will be the long running units. I have some which were run on a Xeon x5650. They all seem to run in the 18 to 23 hour range. The shorter ones like T000 or T001 seem to take 2 to 3 hours. Somewhere near the beginning of the project there were a couple of posts about work unit length.See here
----------------------------------------Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've managed to snag what appears to be an absolute monster of a WU, HST1_ 009693_ 000054_ AC0024_ T300_ F00091_ S00014_ 1--. It is 66% done with a runtime of 1 day and 20 hours with another estimated 23 hours to go. The laptop it is running on has been crunching the recent SCC units in under 3 hours so while it isn't the fastest machine in the world, I really didn't expect any unit here to be taking almost 3 days runtime. Anybody else got one of these behemoths? Are you sure it is not one of the" Hung Up" processes? I have had some 30 + hr work units. However, I was just awarded the same number of credits as a 24 hr work unit. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
genhos
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2009 Post Count: 1103 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As it is slowly progressing through, the boinc client says it is crunching at just under 1.5% per hour and it seems to be check pointing on a regular basis, then I don't think it is hung up rather a unit far larger than I have seen before. It will be interesting to see what runtime my wingman has on this one.
----------------------------------------Thanks for the link Sgt Joe, I missed that previously. |
||
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
genhos
----------------------------------------Just out of curiosity how do you gain access to what the wingman's results are? ![]() ![]() |
||
|
asdavid
Veteran Cruncher FRANCE Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 521 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
genhos Just out of curiosity how do you gain access to what the wingman's results are? On the result status page you click on the result name, and you get the details for both tasks: sample below SCC1_ 0000237_ Lin-ZNF-A_ 35570_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) - In Progress 4/1/17 19:13:19 4/11/17 19:13:19 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 SCC1_ 0000237_ Lin-ZNF-A_ 35570_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) - In Progress 4/1/17 17:42:38 4/11/17 17:42:38 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 SCC1_ 0000237_ Lin-ZNF-A_ 35570_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 708 Error 4/1/17 17:42:29 4/1/17 19:13:14 0.00 32.4 / 0.0 Is that what you are looking for?
Anne-Sophie
![]() |
||
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks asdavid. How can you tell which result is the wingmans?
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |