| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
| World Community Grid Forums
|
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
|
| Author |
|
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I am new to the grid but I noted that the TB project was different in that there was a wide variation in the processing times. FAH2 and MCM have been consistently long processing time but the TB times on the one device had a wide variation of processing times. What is the reason for this?
----------------------------------------HST1_ 005914_ 000087_ AT0003_ T001_ F00085_ S00006_ 2-- 1.83 / 1.85 50.1 / 0.0 HST1_ 005891_ 000060_ KC0006_ T350_ F00002_ S00007_ 2-- 10.15 / 10.25 259.4 / 0.0 HST1_ 005825_ 000042_ AC0017_ T001_ F00013_ S00006_ 0-- 1.83 / 1.84 49.6 / 0.0 HST1_ 005712_ 000024_ MC0027_ T001_ F00014_ S00005_ 1- 2.25 / 2.26 60.8 / 0.0 ![]() ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by dcs1955 at Jul 27, 2016 4:16:30 AM] |
||
|
|
SekeRob
Master Cruncher Joined: Jan 7, 2013 Post Count: 2741 Status: Offline |
"Wide Variation" is actually the norm at WCG, except the different runtime ranges are here easily recognized by their designators (as scientist explained, first part of a task name is for WCG indexing purposes, part is for the themselves)
T000+T001 are shorter T300+T325+T350+T400 are long to very long. The closest answer on the why is here https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewpostinthread?post=517439 ... different simulation systems. |
||
|
|
DCS1955
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: May 24, 2016 Post Count: 668 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks for the link. It is good to understand the mechanics of the projects. This forum's search engine at least in my hands usually turns up nothing.
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
|